EATING LUBRICANT

How to make "vegetable" oil:

1. Collect seeds (soy, corn, canola, cottonseed)
2. Heat to 200°C to extract oil
3. Add hexane (petroleum solvent also used in glue and varnish) 
4. Boil off most of the hexane (most, not all)
5. Add sodium hydroxide (drain cleaner) to remove impurities
6. Bleach it because it's brown and smells like fish
7. Deodorize it at 250°C because it smells rancid
8. Add synthetic antioxidants to slow down (not prevent) oxidation

Congratulations. You've made a substance that:
- Didn't exist before 1900
- Requires industrial chemicals to produce
- Oxidizes in your body
- Integrates into cell membranes for 600+ days
- Creates inflammation for years

But at least it's from plants. So it must be healthy. Are we not foolish?
"Vegetable oil" is marketing fraud. There are no vegetables in it. It's made from seeds:

- Soybean oil (soybeans are legumes, not vegetables)
- Canola oil (rapeseed, not a vegetable)
- Corn oil (corn is a grain, not a vegetable)
- Sunflower oil (sunflower seeds, not vegetables)
- Safflower oil (safflower seeds, not vegetables)

If they called it "seed oil" or "industrial waste oil" you wouldn't buy it. So they call it "vegetable oil" and put vegetables on the label. It's not from vegetables. It's from seeds processed with industrial chemicals.
The name is designed to make you think you're consuming plants. You're consuming chemically-extracted, bleached, deodorized polyunsaturated fat that's been heat-damaged before you even open the bottle.
 
But "vegetable" sounds healthy. That's the entire con. Linguistic fraud to sell industrial waste as health food. Seed oils were invented as machine lubricants, and only later as cooking oil.

 Professor George Dr.

Now this machine lubricant makes up 30% of American's daily calories. Racks up oxidative stress even if "cold-pressed". Promotes inflammation, insulin resistance and fat storage. Breaks down into carcinogenic byproducts even at body temperature. And has zero nutritional value. Yet, it's somehow the healthy alternative to animal fats . What a joke!

How to read ingredient labels:
See: Soybean oil -> Put it back
See: Canola oil -> Put it back
See: Sunflower oil -> Put it back
See: Heart healthy-> Put it back
See: Corn oil -> Put it back
See: Cottonseed oil -> Put it back
See: "Vegetable oil" - > Put it back
See: "Vegetable oil blend" -> Run away
See: Butter, tallow, lard -> Buy immediately

 

 Professor George Dr.

oondseS

 

RANDOMS 2026 #9

HITS ARE FRUITLOOPS

I know I keep going on about this but the hitcount on this blog is completely fruitloops. During February the hits have varied from under 100 (a low of 79 on Feb 3) to over 8000 (a high of 8086 on Feb 16) hits in a day. That is madcore.

There don't appear to be any streams of traffic coming from links on other sites so it's probably not that. I suspect it's just that the hit counter is AI slop. 

Or, maybe Google analytics are really trying to tell me something. That it's all bollocks so who gives a toss anyway. 

My rules of Blogging 101:

1. Write blog posts strictly for my own entertainment.

2.  Don't even look at the hit count or stats. Who cares?

3. Include shitloads of images. More is better.

3. Have lots of LOLS. Being serious is lame & gay.

5. There are no rules to blogging. Rules are lame & gay.

 

KEEP ON THINKING

This is very prophetic now that we live in a society of jabbed up zombie phonetards who wouldn't notice if there were lines in the sky and poison in the water...

 

 

Hannah Arendt warned us 70 years ago: the real danger isn't making people believe lies—it's making them give up on truth entirely. 

 

She was a German-born political philosopher who survived the rise of Nazism, fled Europe, and spent the rest of her life trying to understand how civilized societies descend into totalitarian nightmares. 

 In 1951, she published "The Origins of Totalitarianism," a work that remains chillingly relevant today. Arendt's central insight was this: 

 

Totalitarian systems don't succeed by convincing people of their ideology. They succeed by destroying people's ability to think at all.

 

In her most famous observation from that book, Arendt wrote:

"The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (and the distinction between true and false) no longer exists."

 

Read that again. The goal isn't belief—it's confusion. It's exhaustion. It's making people so overwhelmed by competing claims, so buried in lies and counter-lies, that they simply give up trying to know what's real. 

 

When you can no longer tell truth from lies, you can no longer tell right from wrong. And when that happens, you become easy to control—not because you've been persuaded, but because you've stopped trying to think for yourself.

 

Arendt understood something crucial: totalitarian education is not about indoctrination—it's about destroying the capacity to form any convictions at all. 

 

If people believe nothing, question nothing, and trust nothing, they won't resist anything. They'll float along, numb and passive, as the world around them darkens. 

 

In her later essay "Truth and Politics" (1967), Arendt explored how lies function in political systems. She observed that constant, pervasive lying doesn't just spread falsehoods—it erodes the very concept of truth. 

 

 

When everything is contested, when every fact is dismissed as partisan, when reality itself becomes a matter of opinion, then truth loses its power entirely. And when truth has no power, neither does justice, morality, or human dignity. 

 

Arendt watched this happen in real time in 1930s Germany. She saw how the Nazis didn't just lie—they created an environment where lying became so constant, so overwhelming, that ordinary people stopped caring what was true. They became numb. Cynical. Detached. And in that numbness, atrocities became possible.

 

She wrote about this not to assign blame, but to issue a warning: This can happen anywhere. It can happen to anyone. It starts not with violence, but with the slow destruction of our ability to distinguish reality from fiction. So what do we do? Arendt believed the answer lay in what she called "thinking."

 

Not just absorbing information, but actively engaging with it. Questioning. Reflecting. Holding multiple perspectives. Refusing to accept easy answers or simplistic explanations. 

 

She wrote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." Meaning: the moment we stop thinking critically, the moment we accept any narrative without question—even one we agree with—we've already lost. 

 
Totalitarianism doesn't announce itself with jackboots and tanks. It begins quietly, in the gradual erosion of our capacity to know what's real. It thrives in cynicism, exhaustion, and the belief that "all politicians lie" or "you can't trust anyone" or "who knows what's really true anymore? 

 

"That resignation—that exhaustion—is exactly what Arendt warned us about. Hannah Arendt died in 1975, but her warning echoes forward: Guard your capacity to think. Demand evidence. Distinguish between fact and opinion. Don't let the flood of lies make you give up on truth itself. Because once you stop caring what's true, you've already lost everything that matters.

 

The fight isn't just about believing the right things. It's about refusing to stop thinking at all

 

 

I CAN'T HELP MYSELF

Given how totally gross KFC both looks and smells, it boggles my mind that there are so many of these disgusting American franchises in New Zealand. 

I live just down the road from one, and every time I walk past it I inhale it's thick aroma of greasy chemicals and stare at fat people getting out of their cars in the car park. (Yes, for real, almost all their customers are fat).

About 30 years ago I tried eating one piece of KFC chicken but it was so revolting I spat it out. And it's safe to say I've never been tempted to try it again.

So avoiding KFC (or any other junk food) really isn't a problem, I'm simply not tempted. But giving up my last two social media temptations, Youtube and Facebook, has proven harder.

If they weren't trying to force feed me so much pathetic AI slop I would just keep on sneaking a quick look, but AI is like the stench of KFC, it wafts about, like a stenching fart that I I'm trying to avoid but keep noticing.

Miles Mathis (who is probably a fake himself) recently wrote this:

"Why is Youtube now overrun by fake AI videos like these claiming to be narrated by Joe Rogan . . . but not. Not only are the subjects fake, but Rogan isn't narrating them: an AI voice is mimicking him.

You can tell it isn't him because it is mispronouncing a lot of words Rogan knows how to pronounce. For instance, in one he mentions a date of 1992, but says “one-thousand nine-hundred and ninety-two”.

No human makes that mistake. And this is just one channel of many publishing hundreds or thousands of fake videos. Youtube has rules against things like this and it used to police them, but now it promotes them instead, I am guessing as part of Operation Chaos. 

The question is, why is Rogan allowing it? He has to know about it. 

It looks to me like AI has been tasked with creating literally millions of fake videos tailored for every possible interest, to snare you in an endless loop, waste as much of your time as possible, stir your brain, create fear and unease, and make it impossible for you to tell reality from fiction. Why? To
keep you from starting the revolution. 

 They want you to think Joe Rogan and his pals are on it, so you can just sit back and watch. You are supposed to believe that Trump and Rogan and Tucker and RFK, Jr., and a gaggle of CIA whistleblowers pretending to be white hats are rousting out the Deep State, starting with the Epstein files.

And they are going to clean up your food supply while they are at
it, as well as declassify the aliens, explain the pyramids, and tell you what happens after we die. Ain't it great? So you can sit on the sidelines and cheer, or go back to sleep.

Even worse, they mix in a lot of truth, for maximum confusion. I am not saying everything they say is wrong. Some of it, like outing fake food, is true. See Rogan outing Kraft mac and cheese as the garbage it is. 

Unfortunately, when this is mixed with a lot of AI fakes, most people can't tell the difference between the true stuff and the false, and they eventually give up trying. Which is of course the point of it: many will conclude the story about Kraft is as fake as the rest of it, and keep buying their old garbage food."

I can help myself, and I do fully intend avoiding all AI - if that means no more Youtube, so be it. I will miss a few things, like some of the music videos, but I have saved copies of all my favourite ones.

Admittedly I do still quickly check YouTube and Facebook most days, but I'm only engaging in that filthy habit as a sort of quick check to see what normies are freaking out about. Sort of like sniffing some KFC but not actually eating any! (At least that is what I'm telling myself)

Remember the 90's? No phones (I don't use those things either), no AI, and some of the music rocked!

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7gPTwY9cLM