SIFT TOP 5 MOST POPULAR BLOG POSTS THIS WEEK - Scroll down to see the latest posts

Monday, 7 April 2025

THE SIGNS OF A MAN

Some people wonder why I keep going on about "trannies" but I think they are one of the key psyops that are currently in motion.

I make a point of using the word “TRANNY” because it triggers LIBTARDS and WOKETARDS, and I also often put some key words in CAPS because that seems to trigger them as well, which is always a bonus.

Now by the term “TRANNY” I’m referring to people who are playing the role of appearing to be the inverse of their biological gender. One of the more approved words for people with this MENTAL DISORDER is “TRANSVESTITE”. I’m not referring to the transmission systems in cars, which are also called trannies by some mechanics.

The subject has opened up over the past few years, and some TRANNIES are now widely accepted as being MEN IN DRAG, like Michelle Obama (AKA Michael Robinson) but, even that glaringly obvious example took nearly a decade before a lot of people finally saw it.

The next level of trannies are also reasonably obvious, but still a big stretch for most NORMIES. The more obvious ones include European royalty, Hollywood actresses, American “first ladies”, “female” pro athletes, and many “female” politicians. These are mostly Male To Female TRANNIES (MTF). There are also some Female to Male (FTM) TRANNIES but those are rarer and generally harder to spot.

Part of what makes all this more confusing, is that as part of the psyop a lot of “TRANSVESTIGATORS” are actually controlled opposition shills. One of their key tactics is to repeat the mantra “EVERYONE IS AN INVERT” so claiming that pretty much all celebs of any sort are trannies. This is utter bollocks, but it damages the credibility of real transvestigators.

For example, some of them are even claiming male body builders like Arnold Schwarzenegger are biological females. These sort of unlikely claims remain uncensored on mainstream platforms while more legitimate transvestigations are generally taken down hard.


Arnie in this old photo doesn’t appear to be packing much heat, but otherwise has no female features apart from lack of body hair, and that would be waxed or shaved

Transvestigations are another one of the key psyops designed to create uncertainty and confusion (Operation Chaos), and because many people have been reacting fairly badly to this new area of confusion I recently promised several friends I would try to do a blog post with a simple checklist to make this all a bit easier. Depending on what categories were included and how they were split up, the number could have ranged from as low as 10 right up to about 30.  The choices of which measurements and characteristics to include is fairly arbitrary but the used ones are all fairly easy to spot and may be significant, particularly if a lot of them occur together

Just because a person has a few of these characteristics (Except for #1) it by no means proves they are a biological male. The typical sort of score of the suspicious looking “females” we are looking into, is at least 10, and usually more. So it is pretty high really. Recently I watched a Korean movie (Parasite, 2019) and all the female actresses would get a very low score as far as I could tell. That NEVER happens in recent Hollywood movies. Never…

OK, let’s rip into it:

SOME KEY MALE CHARACTERISTICS

# 1. Having a COCK

Yes, this is for real, let’s not beat around the bush here, it’s a major give away. Mostly they keep them well hidden, but not always, and it’s not only Michelle Obama who tends to let things out of the bag sometimes. “Lady Gaga” likes to wave his dick around onstage, and there are quite a few others who look damn strange in a swimsuit.


Michael Robinson scores very high on this checklist – hard to beat in fact!


Pamela Anderson used to pack her lunch much better back in Baywatch days!

#2. Having a brow ridge

Apart from #1, this list is in random order. But it is very rare for females to have a brow ridge. Brow ridge reduction is one of the key surgery procedures done in  Facial Feminization Surgery (FFS),  a set of surgical procedures that alter typically male facial features to make them closer in shape and size to typical female facial features. It includes various bone and/or soft tissue procedures such as foreheadplasty to change the shape of the forehead bone or move the frontal hairline, brow lift, rhinoplasty, cheek implantation, and lip augmentation as well as facial hair removal. – http://aaronstonemd-plasticsurgery

#3. Having an Adam’s apple

Some women do have visible Adam’s apples, but the shape is usually different to male ones, and they are seldom large angular bulges. One of the reasons Sandra Bullock is so often discussed in transvestigation circles is that she has a very masculine Adam’s apple, along with a wide range of other masculine features, along with an unusual name. (Names are frequently another area of interest)

Males tend to have a much more prominent Adam’s apple than females. The Adam’s apple can be reduced with a procedure called a “tracheal shave” or “Chondrolaryngoplasty”. This is best done via an incision in the natural neck skin crease above the Adam’s apple to give the least noticeable scar. It is not always possible to make a large Adam’s apple invisible with this procedure, rather the intent is to change it from the masculine 90 degree Adam’s apple angle to a more feminine 120 degree Adam’s apple angle – http://aaronstonemd-plasticsurgery

#4. Male Q-angle

This is one of the measurements that cannot be easily disguised, nor can it be changed by surgery. So it is a key factor to check out. Typically, for men, the angle is around 12° while, for women, the angle Q angle is 17°. Some of the controlled mainstream medical sites that tend to promote misinformation, are attempting to claim there is no real difference in Q-angle. But there is.


This picture of Cameron Diaz is very revealing. She racks up quite a few points here, including #1, Q-angle, and several others we’ll be getting to soon.

#5. Shoulders wider than hips

This is one of the most basic ratios, and often one of the easiest to spot so is frequently discussed. Yes there are all sorts of body shapes, and not all women have wide hips. But as with all of these measurements, shoulders wider than hips is just another point. Typically men have shoulders around 3x the width of their head, while women have a shoulder width around 2.5x their head width. And their heads are also usually smaller as well.


Sarena Williams is a good case study – “she” fails pretty much everything on this list, as do most pro women’s tennis players. Certainly she scores here on shoulders wider than hips!

#6.MALE FINGER RATIO

This one is of particular interest to me because I fail it quite markedly. Generally a male’s third finger (ring finger) is slightly longer than their first finger (index finger), while a female’s index finger is slightly longer. But in my own case, my index finger is 8mm longer than my third finger, and that’s why I drop a point on this checklist. Various commentators have drawn conclusions about the significance of these ratios, including homosexuality and prostrate cancer, but there is very little consensus, other than most females have a longer index finger.

This also sometimes been called 2D:4D ratio, and there have been claims of it being linked to verbal aggression, and risk taking, but these seem to be from studies that were getting funding to essentially prove that males tend to be more aggressive than females, so not exactly ground breaking research.

#7.LARGE HANDS AND FEET

Generally hands and feet are proportional to overall height, and certainly most tall women have fairly large feet. It’s easier to discuss foot size here rather than hand size because they have actual numbered sizes for feet, but hand and foot sizes generally match each other. I’m referring to US Men’s shoe sizes here (which are one size larger than UK/NZ/Aus sizes – eg. US12 = UK 11 ).

When looking at female celebs and models in particular a common point of note is that they seem to have unusually large hands and feet. Generally men have larger foot to height ratios than females, but this is not always consistent and should only be taken as another one of the measurements. For example, I have a male friend who is 6″1′ and has US9 feet, (overall his smallish feet are the only point he drops), while I also have a female friend who is 6″1″ as well but has US men’s size 12 feet (she scores two points overall, one for her large feet, and another one for her tall overall height).

Cindy Crawford scores another point for her US10 feet…

#8.ULTRA LOW BODY FAT

As western populations have become increasingly obese over the past 50 years, it has become fashionable to be “skinny”, particularly for women, But women naturally have a higher body fat ratio than men. This subject is very controversial and people will argue about it until the cows come home, but to keep things really simple here, and using round numbers, I’ll just say that while a very high portion of both males and females in western societies are overweight, for males it is generally not ideal to have less than 5% body fat, and for females sub 10% is potentially unhealthy. For example, women with sub 10% body fat are often infertile.


American actress Sarah Hyland is another one of many celebs who look unnaturally thin. This may all be a result of eating disorders, but on this list looking skeletal earns another point.

#9. FAKING PREGNANCY

As well has having ultra low body fat, so being unlikely to become pregnant anyway, many “female” celebs have been caught using MOON BUMPS which are a real give away. The two main balls ups that tend to occur when using moon bumps are that they slip down, in some cases very noticeably, or they briefly fold up in the middle when the expectant mother is sitting down. In some cases these incidences are captured on film and some end up going viral for a short while before being deleted from the internet.

Meghan Markle is the most legendary example of moon bump slippage, as hers was dropping out all over the place, while the mainstream desperately tried to cover the whole story up as a “conspiracy theory”.

These embarrassing moments were quickly deleted!

Along with moon bumps there are also cases of no backstory, a classic example being Michelle Obama/Michael Robinson who is supposedly birth mother to two daughters but that entire story falls to bits as soon as it is looked into. New Zealand ex “prime minister” Jacinda Ardern’s pregnancy story is another rabbit hole of epic proportions. She may have successfully worn the moon bump, but the rest of that story is full of holes.

#10. AN ADONIS BELT

The Adonis Belt, which is a visible V in the lower belly area, only occurs in (fit) male bodies, and would never usually be seen in a biological female, so having one of these is a real give away. Some celebs like Pink and Cameron Diaz like to show off their Adonis belts at the beach. While I’m tempted to give this measurement double points, everything here only scores one point.


Pink’s Adonis belt is really quite impressive. Most men would be very proud of that.


Having an Adonis belt is another point on the scoreboard for Cameron Diaz

#11. NO ARSE

Arses come in all sizes and shapes, but no arse at all screams schoolboy, rather than woman. While breasts can easily be boosted with silicon implants (and pretty much all “female” actresses of both sexes have breast implants), arses are harder to fake and implants are more likely to go horribly wrong. So an astonishing number of celeb “sex symbols” seem to have no back end.

Catherine Zeta Jones likes to shake her booty

Portia De Rossi really has the whole package

#12 EXCESSIVELY RAPID AGING AND MASCULINIZATION

Masculinization is when a female takes on male characteristics. I left this one to last because it often stirs up the most resistance and outrage. Some women will argue that transvestigators are picking on post menopausal women who have low estrogen, and their more masculine appearance is normal. But this characteristic applies to a wide range of “women” with ages ranging down to as low as early 30’s, and often includes some quite unusual aging.

Here the actresses Emma Watson and Bonnie Wright from the Harry Potter movies are both shown aged approx 20 and then again around 30. They are fairly typical examples, and anyone who researches the Harry Potter books or movies will find a rabbit hole of such epic proportions that this will barely even be surprising amongst all the other dark secrets. Again this characteristic is not being held to be “proof” of transgenderism, but is just one more point out of more than a dozen.

SOME OTHER BIOLOGICAL RED FLAGS

I decided to stop here at a dozen, or I’d be going on endlessly, but there are quite a few other features of note. Here are another half dozen I have left out:

NO BACK CURVE,  VERY TALL OVERALL HEIGHT, A BIG SQUARE JAW, MALE COLLAR BONES (CLAVICLES),  BIG EARS,  BIG FACIAL FEATURES, AND WIDE SPACED EYES

AND SOME NON BIOLOGICAL POINTS OF INTEREST

These are also some non- biological markers that are commonly taken to be  red flags, here are three of the most frequently observed ones:

REVEALING NAMES – Sometimes these come in the form of masculine surnames such as Katie PERRY or Katherine ROSS. Sometimes it’s first names like TAYLOR Swift or GLENN Close. And sometimes the names are just plain revealing, in a variety of ways, such as Sandra BULLOCK or Courtney COX.

ILLUMINATI HAND SIGNS – The most common one is the “ALL SEEING EYE”, but there are quite a few others that are commonly displayed, like “666” and “Sign Of The Horns”.   https://www.illuminatirex.com/illuminati-signs/

GIVES OFF A MALE VIBE – Yeah, this one is very vague, and causes a lot of indignant outrage. I’m not talking here about the physically repulsive examples, often playing the role of politicians etc, but the supposedly “HOT” celebs. These “women” are heralded as sex symbols and ideal examples of the female form. So why is it that so many heterosexual man find them not just unattractive, but downright creepy. It could be just the overall fakeness, but I think there is an undefinable feminine vibe that men find attractive, and these “women” just don’t have it.


Angela Jolie gives off many different vibes, none of them feminine!


Jessica Simpson certainly scores very highly on this list, but there is something more than the biological markers, something that screams “I’M A MAN IN DRAG!”

 Now, armed with this checklist, you will never see most Hollywood actresses or American first “ladies” in quite the same light again.


Jacqueline LEE Kennedy


Betty Ford

 

 




Sunday, 6 April 2025

HOW TO MAKE FACEBOOK USEABLE

A way to make Facebook more usable is to always view it in your browser with an app called F.B Purity – the main thing this can do is turn off all the crap (no more side bars or notifications)

https://www.fbpurity.com/

325432435_1550415288792041_2541530014972127919_n.jpg

I’ve used FBP for years and regard Facebook as totally unusable without it because of all the crap they put in there.

https://www.fbpurity.com/

2023-07-26_094015.jpg

2023-07-26_095636.jpg


The other important thing to do is to switch to "feeds" so you see everything in chronological order, and not in Facebook's bullshit algorithm feed.


image.png

WARNING-_Heres_How_to_Remove_Facebook_Apps_that_Might_be_Spying_on_You-ls-525x275.jpg

too_much_facebook.jpg

index (2).jpg

images.jpg

fb.spy.jpg

Demotivational-Facebook-CIA.jpg

D8ZwJMzXUAAZEg0.jpg

94701932_110532680631832_2467556224489488384_n.jpg

94016639_271031787395529_8765091978330243072_n.jpg




Saturday, 5 April 2025

TOUGH GUYS DON'T DANCE

This movie is from 1987, and it is based on a Norman Mailer book, it got terrible reviews, and many people consider it to be appalling. In some ways it is, but I have to say I still think it is one of the most entertaining movies I've ever seen.

I recently watched it again, and still found it enthralling. Yes the acting is a bit odd, but compared to the limp, woke, turgid crap that passes for movies these days, this is a work of sheer genius.

The reviews are terrible, but ignore them, reviewers don't know shit from chewed dates. And this movie is definitely chewed dates!

This review is quite entertaining really: https://film-authority.com/2021/03/24/tough-guys-dont-dance/

 "Tough Guys Don’t Dance is trash, but it’s amusingly self-important trash, a film that lays open the vanities and miscalculations of the creative force behind it"

"For bad movie fans, it’s a masterpiece of over-ripe dialogue, ridiculously melodramatic situations, and rabid, macho posturing that curdles the moment it hits the screen. Over 30 years later, we’re still talking about Tough Guys Don’t Dance"




 

Friday, 4 April 2025

WHERE HAVE ALL THE LOLS GONE

 Is society becoming increasingly humourless? Or is it just me? In an attempt to assess this objectively I've been trying to do some comparisons. 


Clearly movies are not funny any more, and I don't think anyone who isn't retarded would try to argue that one. Movies are not anything any more, they are all just utter shit.

So how about LOLPICS? Being a bit of a compulsive collector I save any images that I think are funny, and since 2019 I seem to have saved over 600 pictures each year.

 But in 2023 the numbers starting noticeably dropping off, then in 2024 there were even less, and after a quarter of 2025 I'm on target for only about 160 images - just 1/4 of the number I used to collect up.

So I've posted my last six LOLPIC Galleries from 2019 to 2025 online to see if something is really going on here:

LOLPICS 2019 - Total 624

LOLPICS 2020 - Total 738

 LOLPICS 2021 - Total 902

 LOLPICS 2022 - Total 682

LOLPICS 2023 - Total 391

 LOLPICS 2024 - Total 149

LOLPICS 2025 - Total 125

 

Thursday, 3 April 2025

KIWIS VS AUSSIES

Bleeding Aussie Roo Shaggers

As a Kiwi, sometimes I am horrified to be mistaken for an Aussie. Usually by Americans. 

So now I’m going to explain some key differences between Kiwis and Aussies. People in other countries often assume that because we are neighbours, we are just like each other, and great mates as well. But nothing could be further from the truth. We are more like North and South Korea, Serbia and Croatia, or England and Ireland.

First the big issue, the elephant in the closet. Aussies shag Kangaroos. It is a bizarre obsession, and they do it constantly. In a desperate attempt to cover up this national embarrassment they have even made up a story that Kiwis shag sheep. So despite the fact that this has never happened, they always refer to us as “sheep shaggers”

14445-21111-3927.jpg

And the next big one is that they can’t speak English properly. So again they have made up a story to cover up the embarrassing truth. Because there are some vowels they can’t pronounce, they claim that they have no issues with their own speech, and it’s Kiwis that are wrong.

The most famous example is “fish and chips” Aussies can’t pronounce either of these words so they say “feesh and cheeps”. Although anyone who can speak English properly can hear this obvious balls up, as a cover story they accuse Kiwis of saying “fush and chups”

Debbas-Fish-Chips_29.jpg

Then there is the whole Rugby thing. Aussies are obsessed with Rugby, it’s their national sport, but they are not very good at it. In fact every time there is a NZ vs Aus test match they get totally spanked by the All Blacks, and have their arses handed to them on a plate.

eight_col_coled.jpg

So in typical Aussie fashion they have invented their own version of Rugby that no other country plays. It’s even called “Aussie Rules”. Odd looking men in tight shorts wrestle about in a homoerotic fashion in front of stadiums filled with drunken Aussies fantasizing that they are watching some public roo shagging.

23750-tlsgalleryportrait.jpg

Another issue of great contention is the Pavlova theft. Australia was originally set up by the English as a penal colony – a place to ship all their criminals to, and get rid of them once and for all. So Aussies, in between shagging kangaroos, like to steal things. It’s in their blood.

At some point they decided to steal our national pudding, claim they invented it, and then to add insult to injury, they now claim we stole it from them.

BW.png

An area that Australia really is world famous for, is feminism. NZ was the first country in the world to give women the vote, and New Zealand is ranked number 4 behind Iceland, Norway and Sweden on the Women in Work Index.

Australia meanwhile, is just famous for its angry militant feminists.

An Aussie “feminist” called Clementine Ford regularly makes headlines for saying things like “Have you killed any men today? – If not, why not?” And the scary thing is that she is not a stand up comedienne taking the piss out of femnazis. She is a regular Aussie femnazi!

clementine-ford-1280x720.jpg

While these things are some of the more critical issues for any Kiwi to keep in mind, I suppose I had better add in another key fact for overseas readers. Australia is a vast desert with hardly any people in it, just millions of dingos and kangaroos. They have the most poisonous spiders and snakes of any country, their rivers are filled with crocodiles and the surrounding sea is filled with sharks.

Great_white_shark_south_africa.jpg

New Zealand has no dangerous or poisonous animals. None at all. We just have millions of sheep and soft cuddly possums. Australia has possums too, but theirs are really ugly looking things. And that is an analogy for the whole NZ vs Aus thing. Yes we have similarities, but in every case NZ is totally superior.

MNI2fGY.jpg
A NZ possum – we have over 30 million of these cute animals, and they are treated like a national treasure

Australia has more than 30 creatures that can kill someone in less than the time it takes to post a Twitter status update “I’ve been swimming with some friendly jellyfeesh but now I feel a bit sheet so I’m going to…”

PU7sSEV.jpg

Both countries are well aware of these underlying truths, but only one has dedicated the past century to making up ever more deranged stories in a desperate attempt to disguise the fact that they can’t say “chips”

kangaroo-beer.jpg