SIFT TOP 5 MOST POPULAR BLOG POSTS THIS WEEK - Scroll down to see the latest posts

Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Saturday, 17 January 2026

DDT IS GOOD FOR ME

In our deranged post covidhoax world, there is often an attitude of "things were better in the good old days", but in actual fact the programing and misinformation has long been just as full on as it is now.

These 10 old adverts are mind boggling examples:

 “Sugar might just be the willpower you need to curb your appetite”

1. Junk Food, Now Fortified with Vitamins and Minerals

Disguising empty calories with healthful nutritional values has been a trope of the processed food world ever since vitamins were first discovered in the 1910s. 

This 1942 poster for “Vitamin Donuts” may be a little hard to swallow today, but Ovaltine’s reputation as a health drink is still being disputed, a powerful testament to simple brand positioning. But let’s be real, we’re talking about powdered chocolate milk made by Nestlé, the company who brought us such healthy foods as Butterfinger candy bars and Häagen-Dazs ice cream.

The Ovaltine ad from 1947 still boggles the mind with its display of so many nutritional perks packed into two glasses of powdered milk, and seems eerily similar to the many supposed benefits contained in drinks like Vitamin Water or Gatorade. In reality, even the benefits of ordinary vitamin supplements are now being questioned, despite the fact that around half of American adults take them regularly.

2. Let Them Eat Lead

The painful part of this ad is its emphasis on kid's enjoyment of a lead paint party; part of the reason children ingested the dangerous product was it's sweet flavor (see above).

The most heartbreaking part of this 1923 brochure is its emphasis on kids having fun with the whole “Lead Family” of products, whose presence in everything from their nursery walls to their windup toys made young children particularly susceptible to its dangers. Combined with lead paint’s seductively sweet flavor, putting kids in environments literally covered with the stuff was a recipe for disaster.

In fact, the effects of lead poisoning (brain damage, seizures, hypertension, etc.) were known long before the Consumer Product Safety Commission finally banned them in 1977; the industry had simply refused to acknowledge them.  

An article by Jack Lewis published in the EPA Journal in 1985 covers lead’s history as an additive and poison, and how we’ve consistently downplayed its adverse effects. Lewis writes:

“The Romans were aware that lead could cause serious health problems, even madness and death. However, they were so fond of its diverse uses that they minimized the hazards it posed. Romans of yesteryear, like Americans of today, equated limited exposure to lead with limited risk.”

3. 7-Up is good for Babies

Not only were sugary soft-drinks great for adults, but sodas like 7-Up used to help babies grow up strong and fit, or so these ads from 1955 and 1953 would have you believe. That’s pretty disturbing, considering that childhood obesity, linked arm-in-arm with massive soda intake, is shortening our youngest generation’s lifespan. The high amount of refined sugar in soda has also been shown to be particularly harmful for children.

Today it seems crazy to show a baby drinking a soda, as the tide finally turns against the sugary drinks: School districts across the nation have removed soda machines from their schools and New York City’s Board of Health has proposed a ban on over-sized sodas. However, many adults today opt to serve kids “healthy” fruit juice, which may be just as bad, despite its deceptive nutritional marketing.

4. Cigarettes: Just What the Doctor Ordered

Camel’s campaign featuring doctor endorsements is probably the most familiar instance of false advertising, seen here in an ad from 1948. Yet almost every cigarette company twisted science to support its products, including Chesterfield’s 1953 ads, which rephrased expert findings to show that smoking had “no adverse effect.” Long after 1950, when Morton Levin published his definitive study linking smoking to lung cancer, experts continued to imply that there were other factors causing cancer and lung disease.

Though the industry has been seriously weakened over the past 20 years, primarily by government regulation, Big Tobacco is still issuing misleading health information in an attempt to reap a profit.

5. Feminine Hygiene: The Original Home Wrecker

Long before Lysol was reinvented as the caustic household cleaner we know today, the same substance was basically promoted for use as a feminine hygiene product. These Lysol ads from 1948 tout the internal use of poisonous Lysol as a marriage saver. To sum up the message: if you weren’t so dirty down there, he would love you more.

In a time when speaking about sex was even more frowned upon than today, a whole spectrum of sexual products, including vibrators and contraceptives, was marketed with campaigns focusing on their dubious health benefits for women.

6. Plastics, Plastics, Everywhere

Suffocating babies in Cellophane! A bunch of infants tied up in clear cellophane packaging is pretty frightening to modern viewers, but at the time, these ads were just plain cute. When these Du Pont Cellophane ads came out in 1954, things like plastic grocery bags weren’t a ubiquitous part of American culture. 

Only after plastic bags became widespread during the 1970s did their strangulating qualities become frighteningly clear.

7. You're right in liking meat 

At least this one was good advice, but it wasn't very fashionable in 2012 when the appalling low fat high carb diet craze was all the rage

In post-World War II America, eating more red meat seemed like a great way to keep yourself “in trim,” at least according to these two ads, from 1956 and 1946. Like other food fads, this campaign was orchestrated by the American Meat Institute, a lobbying group that is still working to improve public and political opinion toward its products. 

Maybe that’s why almost nobody in America knows that nutritionists generally recommend only 2-3 servings of red meat per week. And don’t get the experts started on sodium nitrite in processed meat.

We now know that eating too much meat increases the risk of heart disease and cancer. Yet industry trade groups are still creating food trends to spur sales or combat negative public stereotypes: Think of modern wonder-foods like agave nectar or chia seeds that seemed to appear from the heavens, as well as the bitterly argued corn syrup campaign.

8. Dieting? Try Sugar

In a time before the current widespread obesity epidemic, sugar companies wanted shoppers to believe that a sweet treat would somehow inspire you to eat less. These ads from 1969 coach readers to “have a soft drink before your main meal” or “snack on some candy an hour before lunch.” 

Their strange logic isn’t even backed by a company name, though the campaign does include a helpful mailing address for “Sugar Information.” Talk about creepy.

Now refined sugar is presented as the dieter’s enemy, and is thought to make you want to eat more rather than less.

9. Shock Your Way to Physical Perfection

In 1922, “Violet Rays” were said to cure pretty much anything that ailed you. This Vi-Rex device plugged into a light socket so users could give themselves home shock-treatments, which would supposedly make you “vital, compelling, and magnetic.” Various recalls and lawsuits erupted throughout the U.S., forcing the FDA to finally prohibit their manufacture. The last batch of Violet Ray products was seized in 1951.


10. DDT is good for you and me

This ad for “Penn Salt Chemicals” from 1947 shows a range of dangerous applications for now-illegal DDT, from agricultural sprays to household pesticides. Particularly disturbing is the image of a mother and infant, above the caption stating that DDT “helps make healthier, more comfortable homes.” Not quite.

While effective in eliminating dangerous mosquitoes that carry malaria, DDT also has a variety of hazardous effects: Especially among young children, the chemical has been shown to damage the nervous, immune, endocrine, and neurological systems, not to mention its devastating influence on the natural environment. 

The spread of DDT across mid-century America is mirrored today by the success of Monsanto (one of the companies that originally manufactured DDT) in placing its genetically modified products on store shelves before researchers have a full understanding of their larger ecological impacts.

 

 This content is an updated copy of a post from 2012: the-top-10-most-dangerous-ads

Sunday, 21 December 2025

HOLIDAY IN CAMBODIA

A friend just asked if I knew anything about the current Cambodia vs. Thailand conflict, and if there was any likelihood of it leading to another Pol Pot style genocide.

Apart from listening to The Dead Kennedys "Holiday in Cambodia" song from 1980, I've done no research on that area at all. So out of curiosity I had a very quick look online today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr6NOsluHYg

There appears to have been an ongoing border dispute over some boundaries on a map from 1907 which has regularly escalated into violence ever since.

The main thing I've heard is that Cambodia is very poor, so I was surprised to see how many fairly late model Russian made BM-21 multiple rocket launchers were driving about in the photos. I wonder who funds those?

https://en.thairath.co.th/scoop/theissue/2902702

Cambodia has a bad reputation for using them to frequently fire rockets at civilian areas in Thailand.

Meanwhile Thailand has 54 American made F-16 fighter jets that have been fully upgraded. That is some serious money. Again, who is funding them?

I'm guessing that like most wars this is an engineered conflict designed to make big profits for arms manufacturers, as well as a way to destabilise the area.

Trump seems to have been making statements about a cease fire but has been clueless and looks like an idiot, so business as usual.


Will all this lead to another POL POT?

I didn't see anything suggesting that in my quick look online, but it's not easy to find much good info about any of this.

The globalists would need to have some plan in mind and nothing obvious jumped out at this stage.

But I guess they might use the 50th anniversary to highlight Pol Pot in order to bring in international laws against genocide - & promote a one world government.
 
 
Another aspect to all this is that both Thailand and Cambodia are considered epicenters of child trafficking and pedophilia. Given what the illuminati are into, this could well be the real motivation for them to inflame the conflict between these two countries.
 

Tuesday, 29 July 2025

THE FLU RNAMED

 This was a post I originally did in March 2020 and later came to be very proud of!

The flu renamed every two years is still the flu. Virus theory is all complete bullshit anyway.

Viral disease is poisoning. Corona started with industrial pollution and 5g rollout in Wuhan. Spanish flu was vaccination and aspirin poisoning http://whale.to/v/spanish_flu.html.

Polio was DDT poisoning http://whale.to/v/polio2.htm Flu is air pollution (inc emf) and winter vit d deficiency http://whale.to/vaccines/flu.html Meningitis is drug poisoning http://whale.to/vaccine/meningitis2.html

Smallpox was a mild easily curable non contagious sanitary disease http://whale.to/vaccines/smallpox.html. They changed meaning of virus from poison to germ to create fear and hence vaccination http://whale.to/c/disease_theory_summary.html They then vanished toxicology http://whale.to/a/west_h.html. They then vanished the vitamin c cure for all viral disease since 1930s which would have destroyed vaccination http://whale.to/a/vitamin_c_banners.html

No virus has ever been isolated. http://whale.to/c/virology_banners.html. “Viruses have never been isolated, none, there is no measles virus” — Dr Robert Young

There is no such thing as a virus.

Paul Erlich and Robert Koch and some others made up the theory in the late 1800s.

image.png

image.png

All the modern chemical giants were just getting started mid century, around the time that germ theory was taking off.

When people were getting sick and dying from exposure to the new chemical poisons, they needed a way to divert attention. They tried to claim these illnesses were infections, but could find no infectious agent under the microscopes. So they made up viruses.

They were hypothesized to be little tiny bugs too small to see. What is telling is, the word virus means liquid poison.

It was not until the late 1930s that they invented the electron microscope and could see really small things, things the size of small snips of dna floating around in the lab juice. When they found these things they just pointed at them and said, “Ah hah! We’ve found what we were looking for.” Which is ridiculous because they did not know anything at all about what they had just found, what it was, where it came from, what it did.

In order to prepare a specimen for the electron microscope, you have to kill it. So when they are looking at “viruses” they are looking at cellular debris from cells that have been poisoned.

How do they find a virus? They take tissue, blood, or whatever, culture it in a lab, then poison it so the cells die and become just a pile of goo. They then make the electron microscope slide and look at the gunk on the slide. In all that gunk are little snips of dna. And there you have your virus.

A virus is a piece of poisoned, lab grown dna.

When they say, “viral illness” what they mean is poisoning. If you have a viral illness, you have been poisoned and your body is cleaning itself out.

What else besides things we ingest or inject can destroy our cells and make us ill, causing little snips of dna to show up in lab cell cultures? Electromagnetic radiation.

What is more, they are identifying this virus via pcr testing (polymerase chain reaction testing). They are identifying tiny little fragments of the dna code of these snips. They are not sequencing the entire thing in each patient.

So all these people are coming down with illnesses that cause the destruction of their cells and it is being called a viral illness because they find bits of dna in the resultant dead tissues.

They are finding the results of what they do and thinking it is the cause of the illness. They are making people sick, then blaming something they find as a result of their actions.

Elliott Freed

image.png

DR STEFAN LANKA DEBUNKS PICTURES OF “ISOLATED VIRUSES”

Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, is internationally mostly known as an “AIDS dissident” (and maybe “gentechnology dissident”) who has been questioning the very existence of “HIV” since 1994. In the past years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE of the (medically relevant) viruses has ever been isolated; there is no proof of their existence. Actually, Dr. Lanka already stated three years ago, in the almost “legendary” Zenger´s interview:

“So, for a long time I studied virology, from the end to the beginning, from the beginning to the end, to be absolutely sure that there was no such thing as HIV. And it was easy for me to be sure about this because I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses – as well as other viruses which are claimed to be very dangerous – in fact do not exist at all.”

So he thoroughly read the literature on those “other viruses” again, and after he could still not find any paper which would provide the evidence, he encouraged people not to BELIEVE him but to ask the institutes and authorities themselves. This has actually eventuated, mostly initiated by mothers. The responses were revealing. In September 2001 the German book “Impfen – Völkermord im dritten Jahrtausend?” (Vaccination – Genocide in the third millennium?) by Stefan Lanka and Karl Krafeld was published in which they state that there is still no proof of any (medically relevant) virus.

This movement (klein-klein-aktion ~ many little actions/steps) has a German website: www.klein-klein-aktion.de which I have taken (and translated) all the following texts from.

For almost one year we have been asking authorities, politicians and medical institutes for the scientific evidence for the existence of such viruses that are said to cause disease and therefore require “immunization”. After almost one year we have not received even one concrete answer which provides evidence for the existence of those “vaccine-preventable viruses”. The conclusion is inevitable that our children are still vaccinated on the basis of scientific standards of the 18th and 19th century. In the 19th century Robert Koch demanded in his generally accepted postulates evidence of the virus in order to prove infection; at Koch´s time this evidence couldn´t be achieved directly by visualization and characterization of the viruses, because adequate technology wasn´t available at that time. Methods of modern medicine have profoundly changed over the past 60 years, in particular by the invention of the electron microscope, yet all these viruses we get immunised against have still never been re-examined using this technology?

We showed to Dr. Lanka a number of images and explanations we were pointed to and that were said to show – respectively describe (characterise) viruses. Here are his summarising comments:

“All these photos have in common that they, respectively the authors, can´t claim that they represent a virus, as long as they do not also provide the original publications which describe how and what from the virus has been isolated. Such original publications are cited nowhere.

Indeed, in the entire scientific medical literature there´s not even one publication, where the fulfillment of Koch´s first postulate is even claimed for such viruses. This means that there is no proof that the viruses held responsible for these diseases have been isolated from humans afflicted by them. Nevertheless, this is precisely what they publicly claim.

image.png

Now, regarding the photos submitted:

  1. Many of the photos are colored. This is proof enough, that they are the (art)work of designers, because electron microscopic photos always appear in black and white.
  2. The images of the so called HIV-, measles (Masern)- and smallpox (Pocken) viruses clearly show, as the image descriptions partly already indicate, that these are cells wherein the viruses can allegedly be found. Thus, nothing has been isolated. The photos actually show cells and typical endogenous particles in them. These structures are well known and serve the intra- and inter-cellular transport. Unlike viruses of the same kind – which are consistently the same size and same shape – they differ in size and shape and therefore can´t have been isolated.
  3. In the case of the influenza- herpes-, vaccinia-, polio-, adeno- and ebola-viruses each photo shows only a single particle; nobody claims that they´re isolated particles, let alone particles that have been isolated from humans.

These particles are partially the cellular particles mentioned above (#2) resp. typical artifacts which means: structures that accrue after inappropriate fixing and drying of the probes, while being prepared for the electron microscope.

  1. The “isolated” polio viruses are artificial particles, generated by suction of an indifferent mass through a very fine filter into a vacuum. Its structure (no characteristic structures) differ clearly from the ones of the “viruses” in the cells. Here the information is essential that a biochemical characterization of those “isolated” viruses, although “isolation” is claimed, has never been published anywhere nor has anybody even claimed such a characterization.
  2. The photo of the hepatitis B “viruses” does not show isolated structures, but – as the image title already says, an agglutinate. This is the scientific/medical term for proteins from the blood that are clumped together, as is typical for coagulations. Typically, round and also crystal structures accrue – depending on the condition of the blood sample – as a consequence .

In summary, it must be said that these photos are an attempt of fraud committed by the researchers and medical scientists involved, as far as they assert that these structures are viruses or even isolated viruses. To what extent the involved journalists and authors of textbooks have contributed to this fraud knowingly or only out of gross negligence, I don´t know. Everyone who starts researching the medical literature, will quickly encounter statements and references that Koch´s first postulate can´t be fulfilled (i.e. Großgebauer: Eine kurze Geschichte der Mikroben, 1997 [“A short history of the microbes”]; editor: Verlag für angewandte Wissenschaft). How these authors who claim the existence of viruses could overlook that, remains a riddle.

Could it be that the term “Contagium” = “Gift” (poison/toxin) = “Virus” from the 18th and 19th century was applied in the 20th century to the cell components which were named “viruses” since the electron microscope was introduced in 1931? And in order to hide this, the “disease causing viruses” have often been described, yet have never been isolated? And then they were used as seemingly logical explanation for poisonings and adverse affects of vaccination, as Luhmann (1995) (i.e.) writes about the symptomatic of Hepatitis B, which was observed for the first time in 1985 following smallpox vaccinations, and 1938 following measles vaccinations? The copies in the textbooks show only homogenous structures within cells and nothing that looks like something which has been isolated. The biochemical characterization, which is crucial, is completely lacking.

Robert Koch and colleagues, Prof. Rush, Prof. Max von Pettenkofer, Prof. Virchow have shown, for instance by experiments and by observation of the Henle-Koch´s rules that by transmission of bacteria, the supposed ‘contagium vivum’, it was not possible to cause the same disease. So Robert Koch modified (weakened) the 3rd postulate of his teacher, the German anatomist Henle, in that the generation of a similar symptom in animal experiments was now considered sufficient to prove the hypothesis of disease causation by infectious bacteria. (See Großgebauer: Eine kurze Geschichte der Mikroben).

So it does not surprise me that Prof. Alfred Fischer writes in his book “Vorlesungen über Bakterien” (“[academic] lectures on bacteria”) from 1897 (!): “As is true for any infectious disease – the fact that it does not only take the addition of the bacteria (for disease to occur) but also the unknown something of individual predisposition, goes without saying.”

Stefan Lanka – https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/dr-stefan-lanka-debunks-pictures-of-isolated-viruses/?fbclid=IwAR2JzEplTBygyagRjkwRhjPagjK08AQOpzU3tCrOfVVE1v0YOTVdXVuMJME

image.png

Friday, 18 July 2025

FOOLS GOLD

Unless you are clutching real gold in your hot sweaty hands, you probably don’t actually have any

Most of the gold that is being traded in the world doesn’t really exist, and pretending to have gold is a sort of national sport for counties like America where there is a vault called Fort Knox that is supposedly full of gold, but has never been audited.

Fort Knox

In 1974 an informant claimed that there was no gold left in Fort Knox. The informant, Louise Auchincloss Boyer, secretary to Nelson Rockefeller, fell out of the window of her New York apartment and died three days after the publication of these claims. How unusual…


http://www.riseearth.com/2017/05/top-15-places-youre-not-allowed-to.html

“On July 4th, 1974, Louise Auchincloss Boyer’s dead body was found beneath the window of her 10th floor apartment. Three days prior, a newspaper published a story in which legal counsel for the American Gold Association accused the Rockefellers of looting Fort Knox of most or all of its gold. The anonymous source of the story had been Mrs. Boyer, executive assistant to Nelson Rockefeller”

Many of the websites covering this are bit hard to find now for some reason, and the online records of this story have been deleted, but if anyone ever claims there is gold in Fort Knox, just ask them to prove it with an independent audit!

To ensure that nobody ever proves that Fort Knox is empty, it is protected by around 30,000 soldiers and a flotilla of attack helicopters.

The Gold-Vault is allegedly protected by a 22-ton blast-proof door, and visitors are STRICTLY forbidden

The Bank Of England

The English on the other hand like to show off their gold online.


https://londonist.com/2014/11/londons-gold-vaults

But they do claim to have over seven times more gold in their vault than all the gold mined in human history, so its a safe bet that most of the gold that they like to show off is fake

So always make sure your bullion comes from somewhere reputable like the Perth Mint – http://www.perthmint.com.au/default.aspx

WHICH IS BEST – GOLD OR SILVER?

They are both very solid investments and when people argue about them, they are missing the point.

If there is a global financial meltdown you won’t care if gold goes up 10% more than silver or vice versa because they will both go up over 1000% so you will be happy either way. Except that the economy will be fucked so you might be bummed out.

Check out a full range of coins available to purchase with cryptocurrency at https://www.mygold.co.nz

The main advantage of gold is that it is very valuable so a small quantity of coins is worth a lot. But in a post apocalypse economy you won’t want to purchase your groceries with a gold coin because it would be worth a lot more than a months worth of groceries. So gold’s strength is also it’s weakness – it would be too valuable for daily trading.


https://www.thememo.com/2016/09/19/walmart-shopping-trolley-patent-driverless-the-next-big-supermarket-innovation-is-driverless-shopping-trolleys/

At this point 1oz silver coins seem more practical, but if the economy really does ever collapse silver coins could be worth more than a bag of groceries too. The catch with silver is that stashing monster boxes of 500 coins does take up a lot of space

Some people are only into crypto currencies and can’t imagine why anyone would want any boring old bullion.

I recently explained it like this:

Bullion is a crypto insurance policy that will leave you with something if the whole crypto market goes pop.

It takes discipline to take a percentage of your $ out of cryptos and put it into bullion, because you might miss out on “big gains”. But if you are really making big gains, what is 10%?

Having a store of bullion paid for out of your crypto profits can give you the confidence to trade on any upswing like you only have about three months to make big gains before the zionist banker overlords manipulate the next crash. Which they will.


https://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/03/nsa-and-jewish-bankers-two-zionist-monsters/

So which coins do I recommenced buying?

Gold in 1/4 oz and 1/10 oz demonstrations, and silver in 1 oz. All just plain coins from reputable mints rather than collectables – Eagles, Maples, Kangaroos, Kiwis – coins built by weights not flashy designs

Here in New Zealand we can buy bullion with cryptos from My Gold


https://www.mygold.co.nz/

Fools Gold

The title of this post comes from one of my favourite 80’s songs – “Fools Gold” by the Stone Roses.

If you want to groove about like a funky hipster this is the song.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSD11dnphg0 

“This is the track of my youth. This is epic beyond compare. I used to dance in my 22″ flares and basin haircut with john lennon sunglasses under the influence of many recreational pharmaceuticals. Happy Daze. They don’t make music like this no more – funk defined.”

Monday, 30 June 2025

ATOM BOMB GALLERY

For everyone who believes "Atom Bombs" are real - this gallery of nuclear bomb wallpaper may have the desktop image you are looking for


 (Click on the images to see them full size)







 
 See more here

Thursday, 19 June 2025

WOMAN'S BICYCLE RACING

Three things about women's bicycle racing I never knew:

1. There were women's bicycle races in 1900

 2. There were women's bicycle races at the Basin Reserve, Wellington, New Zealand in 1900.

3. In NZ women bicycle racers used to tie their shoe laces to the hems of their skirts, to avoid the danger of exposing any lower leg. 

Basin Reserve Wellington 1900

In Europe women's cycling was a bit more evolved and modest riding clothing was more functional.