Showing posts with label wapf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wapf. Show all posts

Wednesday, 3 June 2026

FEMINISING OF MEN

Eight Ways Society is Feminising Men Through Food And Products

A reoccurring theme in many of the food health concerns revolves around high estrogen levels. This can be harmful to men and women. It’s almost as if there is a conspiracy to reduce the population of humans on planet earth.

Perhaps Ori Hofmekler said it best:

“We’re on the fast track to extinction. In the past 50 years, sperm counts in men have dropped 50 percent, while the average man’s testosterone and sperm count has plummeted 20 percent in just the last 20 years.” 
 
There are dozens of chemicals found nearly everywhere that confuse sperm and destroy male health.

The conspiracy behind it seems rather obvious but debating the point is futile. What matters most is that we recognize that it is a problem and find ways to fix it.

According to Dr. Russell Blaylock, noted neurosurgeon and author of The Blaylock Report:

“Studies show that xenoestrogens from plastics appear to cause premature menses in young girls. Soy isoflavones appear to increase aggressiveness and heighten antisocial behavior in monkeys and appear to feminize male animals.”

Below is a list of high-estrogenic foods that should be avoided to live a life of abundant health that can be passed down to offspring.

 

1. Pesticides Used On Fruits and Vegetables

Pesticides that are sprayed on conventionally grown vegetables (often GMOs) act as estrogens once ingested.

The pesticides sprayed on conventionally grown (non-organic) vegetables act as estrogens once inside the body. (Source: PESTICIDES MAY BLOCK MALE HORMONES)

 

2. Soy Is Not Healthy


 Soy causes Gynecomastia aka Man Boobs (Moobs)

There are many reasons to avoid soy, one of the most heavily subsidized crops by the United States government. One of the best is the high estrogen-like effects on the human body. Soy leads to enlargement of breast tissue, water retention, female pattern fat deposition and mood swings. It can also decrease testosterone. (Source: 170 Scientific Reasons to Lose Soy in your Diet)

 

3. Hormones In Some Beef

To increase meat and milk products hormones are given to cows by some farmers. This meat, when ate by humans, is transferred to us. Once inside the body these compounds have strong estrogenic effects.

In addition cows are fed soy that has been soaked in pesticides. This is a triple whammy. This is why it is critical to eat grass-fed beef.

 

4. Beer
 

In his book The Natural Testosterone Plan, Stephen Harrod Buhner writes:

“Hops is best known for its use in beer. The majority of physicians and men overlook its potent chemicals and do not realize that beer itself can significantly alter the male androgen levels. German beer makers noticed long ago that the young women who picked hops in the fields commonly experienced early menstrual periods. Eventually, researchers discovered the reason – hops is perhaps one of the most powerfully estrogenic plants on Earth. Just 100 grams of hops (about 3.5 ounces) contains anywhere from thirty thousand to three hundred thousand IUs of estrogen, depending on the type of hops.

Most of it is the very potent estrogen estradiol. Estradiol, as it is taken into the male body, causes a direct lowering of testosterone levels in the testes and an increase in SHBG levels, which then binds up even more free testosterone in the bloodstream. The estradiol in hops has also been found to directly interfere with the ability of the testes Leydig cells to produce testosterone. The presence of this highly estrogenic substance in beer is not an accident.”

Commercials will have one that that drinking beer makes a man macho. Nothing can be further from the truth!

  

5. Television and the Feminization of Men

Male feminization on television has slowly be conditioned into the psyche of men. This has dramatically altered behavior patterns. To discuss this among some, it can be seen as homophobic. In reality, it’s recognizing that through diet and entertainment, a new male has risen and ‘he’ is more ‘she’ than ever.

 

6. Unsaturated Fats

Unsaturated fats from vegetable oils are mostly soy, which is an estrogenic plant byproduct, among the highest on the planet. These are covered in pesticides, which come with their own estrogenic properties.

Saturated fats from lard, butter, tallow, coconut oil, and so on help produce testosterone and are preferred alternatives.

 

7. BPA in Plastics

Xenoestrogen is a class of chemical that mimics estrogen in humans. Chemicals from plastics leak into cans, bottles, packaging of food, rivers, streams, lakes, oceans and everything else. Plastic is everywhere.

According to the national Institute of Health:

 “Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical produced in large quantities for use primarily in the production of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins.”

Over 93% of American’s have BPA in their bodies. This reduces sperm counts in males.

Environmentalist Bruce Lowry describes the side effects we’re seeing from exposure to BPA:

“Things like Attention Deficit Disorder, Childhood Obesity, Asthma, Autism, and then a whole range of Cancer’s that we’re seeing too – Brain Cancer, Liver Cancer, Prostate Cancer. ”

 

8. Pthalates in Scents

Studies in male animals exposed to pthalates have found reduced sperm production, undescended testes, hypospadias, and decreased testosterone production.

Sources of Pthalates to avoid:

Shampoos, Colognes/Perfume, Deodorant, Hair Spray, Body Lotion, Makeup, Glade Plug-ins and other Air Fresheners.

 

Thursday, 23 April 2026

VACCINATIONS & COT DEATHS


Although vaccination is undoubtedly the single biggest and most preventable cause of cot-death, it is not the only one. 

If we write too much about vaccination, we would inevitably create an impression that we think vaccines are the only cause of cot death. The key words in cot death are Non-Specific Stress Syndrome.

Related: Vaccine Court Is a Big Pharma Fraud

This is the underlying mechanism of all cot deaths and it explains all pathological and clinical observations.

[Note: This article was written in 1991. To say that given this information, that there remains nefarious intent behind the pro-vaccine propaganda that continues to exist - would be an abhorrent understatement.]

Cot Death is the single biggest cause of death in infants from about four weeks to six months of age, with another peak at about 9 months in industrially developed countries.

It gets a lot of media exposure and people are successfully asked to dip into their pockets and contribute to cot death research.

This has been going on for some fiftty years now and yet cot death remains a "mystery which may never be resolved".

Perhaps the time has come for the doctors and the public to start asking some relevant questions, such as why, with so much money poured into research, cot death is still officially presented as that famous 'mystery' and more and more money is 'needed' to resolve it in 'years to come'.

Some 30 years ago, my husband Leif Karlsson, a biomedical engineer specialising in patient monitoring Systems, and myself, a retired Principal Research Scientist, were looking for a paediatrician willing to undertake proper research with our Cotwatch Breathing Monitor.

The emphasis with this equipment is on 'breathing' because most, if not all of the machines used to monitor babies' breathing in their homes are not breathing monitors - they are "motion monitors" where any movement is taken as breathing.

After one particular meeting, where our demonstration of marked differences between the level of alarms in near miss and new born babies fell on the deaf ears of cot death 'researchers', we looked at each other and said with one breath: "Let's do a damn good job of this research ourselves".



Related: Vaccine Authoritarians Try To Censor Billboard That Dares Ask, “Do You Know What’s In A Vaccine?” & Australia Will Now Fine Parents Twice A Month If They Don’t Vaccinate Their Kids

Leif spent one and a half years developing a microprocessor-based Cotwatch. With this equipment you don't have to rely on records of alarms; you get computer printouts of the longitudinal record of a baby's breathing. You can't have more objective information than that.

Our records confirmed the existence of a Stress-Induced Breathing Pattern, which is a low-volume breathing (5-10% of the volume of normal unstressed breathing), occurring in clusters (3-6 shorter episodes within 10-15 minutes) when a child is incubating illness or teething or following "insults", such as exposure to cigarette smoke, fatigue, over handling by visitors, or vaccination needles.

Numerous causes, but the same reaction. Many years ago, a Canadian medical doctor, Dr Hans Selye, became particularly interested in the well-known fact that for a number of days before patients develop symptoms of specific illness, which can be diagnosed, they always show signs of a non-specific nature which are common to many or possibly all diseases.



Related: Dr. Brian Hooker debunks the myth that vaccines are “safe” for pregnant women

When he in-injected extracts of tissues, or a great variety of noxious substances into rats, he observed the following signs of organ damage: spot-like bleeding into lungs and thymus, shrunken thymus and all lymphatic structures, enlarged adrenal cortex, ulceration of the gastro-intestinal tract, derangements in body creased or control, viscosity of the blood, disappearance of eosinophils (white blood cells) from blood, etc.

He concluded that he was looking at a universal reaction of organisms to any noxious substance. He also connected the results of his experiments with his earlier observations of patients with non-specific symptoms of the initial stages of any illness.

Seyle also concluded that the Non-Specific Stress (or General Adaptation) Syndrome has three stages: the alarm stage when the body is under acute attack and mobilises all its defences; the stage of adaptation or resistance, when it seems to relax and seemingly accepts the intruding noxious substance; and the stage of exhaustion, when the body again tries to rid itself of the intruder. Death may occur in any of the three stages.



Related: Killing Babies - Vaccinations: Part 1: Medical Research on SIDS and Epidemics

 

 

The definition of Cot Death is: 

 
"The sudden death of any infant or a young child, which is unexpected by history, and in which a thorough port-mortem examination fails to demonstrate an adequate cause of death". 

 - Byard, 1991


What does all this have to do with cot death and breathing?

Similarly to what Dr Selye found with noxious substances, there are many interesting and consistent tell-tale signs that forewarn of impending cot death.

Cot death is a very well-defined pathological entity and all babies who succumb to it have the same post mortem findings.

These are: petechiated lungs, thymus and sometimes also pericardium (spot like haemorrhaging on surface); shrunken thymus and lymphatic structures; signs of increased adreno-cortical activity; signs of ulceration of the gastro-intestinal tract (reflux); many babies have low viscosity blood; up to 90% of babies who succumb to cot death have a number of non-specific symptoms for up to three weeks before death, such as runny nose, coated tongue, sticky eyes, otitis media, enlarged tonsils, spleen and liver, rash, a variety of upper respiratory tract infections, and loss of body weight to mention just a few.



Related: Harvard Immunologist: Unvaccinated Children Pose Zero Risk To Anyone And Here’s Why + New York Times Confirms Natural News Investigation: Mumps Now Spread Mostly By Vaccinated Children

These are all symptoms of the Non-Specific Stress Syndrome as defined by Dr Selye.. Those people involved in Cot Death management all over the world know about these symptoms, but they usually play them down as unimportant and insufficient to cause death in an infant.

None of them has connected these well-known symptoms associated with cot death, with the Non-Specific Stress syndrome. Perhaps for their sake this is just as well, because they would have been unable to prove the validity of this connection in the absence of adequate means to demonstrate it in the infant's breathing pattern.

So where does vaccination come into the problem of Cot Death?

Initially we did not know about the controversy surrounding vaccination.

We merely observed that vaccination was the single greatest cause of stress in small babies, as indicated by the standard Cotwatch equipment, and also the single greatest factor preceding cot death in a large number of cases.

We concluded that the timing of 80% of the cot deaths occurring between the second and sixth months is due to the cumulative effect of infections, timing of immunisations and some inherent specifics in the baby's early development.



Related: It IS the vaccines – Aluminum adjuvants in vaccines linked to autism

We started yet another search for more information. Soon we discovered a wealth of it in medical journals like The Lancet concerning not only the ineffectiveness of vaccines in preventing children from contracting infectious diseases, but also on adverse effects of various vaccines, including death.

Regarding the former aspect, we found numerous reports that vaccinated and non-vaccinated children contract the relevant infectious disease at approximately the same rate, or that vaccinated children are even more susceptible to the infectious diseases.

Inevitably, we began recording breathing patterns of babies after vaccination. The results of these recordings were presented to the 2nd Immunisation Conference, held in Canberra, 27~29th May 1991.

We demonstrated that microprocessor records of babies' breathing after DPT (Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus) injections reveal a pattern of flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing closely following the dynamics of adreno-cortical activity in an individual under stress and as observed by Dr Selye.

We also demonstrated that flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing in babies after administration of the DPT vaccine occur characteristically on certain days even though the amplitude of the flare-ups varies from child to child.



Related: Renowned Doctor Slams Medical Education & Says We Have “An Epidemic Of Misinformed Doctors”

For seventy babies who succumbed to cot death, although babies could die on any day after DPT injection, there were significantly more deaths on the days which closely correlated with flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing after DPT injections.

The data on the time interval between the DPT injection and cot death in most of the seventy babies was taken from the published reports which concluded that there was no connection between DPT and cot death. The authors of these papers had little idea what they were looking at or what to look for.

Most researchers arbitrarily accept that only deaths within 24 hours of administration of the vaccine can be attributed to the effect of the vaccine. Yet, babies may and do die for up to 25 or more days after vaccination, and still as a direct consequence of the toxic effects of the vaccines.

How do we know this? Because of the observed repetition of the pattern of flare-ups of Stress-Induced breathing in a number of babies over a long period of time.

What are the vaccines composed of?

Vaccines contain live or 'attenuated' (weakened) viruses and bacteria or parts of them (representing foreign genetic material), animal tissue, formaldehyde and/or aluminium phosphate or hydroxide.



Related: American Academy of Pediatrics Concerned About Unregulated Food Additives, but Not Vaccine Additives

The toxicity of vaccines varies widely and unpredictably, a DPT vaccine containing from 1 to 26.9 micrograms of endotoxin per millilitre. Geraghty and others in California tried unsuccessfully to make sure that the toxicity and composition of the vaccines is properly disclosed on the ampules.

Injecting any of these substances into the blood stream of another animal species, including humans, is absolutely biologically unacceptable.

H.L. Coulter in his book, Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality: the Medical Assault on the American Brain, mentions that repeated injections of sterile extracts of rabbit brain tissue into monkeys cause an 'experimental allergic encephalomyclitis' in the monkeys.

Regardless of the validity or otherwise of animal experiments for humans, Coulter points out that it is an observed fact that vaccine injections often cause the same syndrome in human babies.

It has been confirmed that a great number of babies, if not all, suffer a clinical or subclinical encephalitis shortly after being injected with a variety of vaccines. Coulter talks about a postencephalitic syndrome.

The great increase in a large array of brain-related conditions in the United States closely followed chronologically mandatory administration of vaccines en masse in that country.



Related: The Chilling Image Behind Every Vaccine

These conditions include autism, learning difficulties, cerebral palsy, dyslexia, hyperactivity, deafness and blindness, left-handedness (according to latest statistics, left-handed people live 9 years less than right-handed people) and permanent brain damage with serious and often life-long consequences.

Vaccines by virtue of their composition act as noxious substances and elicit a response equivalent to the Non-Specific Stress Syndrome.

Recently, we recorded the breathing of an infant injected with only DT (the P component was omitted because the baby had experienced a violent reaction to the two previous DPT injection).

The reaction, as reflected in its breathing, closely resembled the record of its breathing after DPT vaccination. This is not meant to justify the inclusion of the Pertussis (Whooping Cough) component, but to emonstrate that all vaccines are potentially harmful.

It should worry all of us that a large number of medical doctors are forcefully (by psychological pressure and publicity campaigns) without producing any evidence whatsoever of the benefits of vaccination and against all the evidence of the ineffectiveness and dangers of vaccines, injecting vaccines into our children.



Related: What Do Smart Meters And Vaccinations Have In Common? + Another Vaccine Dump

There are even noises indicating that soon the same forceful and unreasonable attitudes will be adopted towards adults.

This is especially bad since it is a public secret that many medical doctors do not vaccinate their own children. This extraordinary fact is reported in DPT-A Shot in The Dark, by H.C. Coulter & B.L. Fisher.

These authors also report that most gynaecologists in the USA refused to be injected with Rubella vaccine. Were they afraid of the side-effects, whilst routinely recommending the procedure for women of childbearing age?

Our conclusion is that if vaccination were to be suspended, the cot death rate would be halved!

What are the remainder of cot deaths attributed to?

The Non-Specific Stress Syndrome is the key to cot deaths. It is the consistent, general reaction of mammals, including humans, to any damage or injury or to substances perceived as noxious by the recipient's body.

There are a great many injuries or substances perceived as noxious which affect babies and produce the same response.



Related: Doctor Robert Scott Bell Explains The History Of Modern Medicine + Why Medical Researcher Calls Doctors 'The Most Brainwashed People On The Planet'

The indiscriminate and routine administration of pain killers during birth, and the substances used for inductions expose our babies to potent allopathic chemicals shortly before they are born. To say that these substances do not affect the babies is not only highly unscientific, it is against commonsense.

Before babies have a chance to fully recover from these potent chemicals, they may be given nasal drops and cough mixtures and, and worse still, antibiotics for those first common colds.

Most of these substances are immuno-suppressive and are not helping the child's immune system to be primed and challenged in a natural and beneficial way by the common cold.

Again, before a baby has a chance to fully recover from the effects of these potent chemicals, there is the first DPT injection. So the immature immune system of a baby is further suppressed, allowing micro-organisms to become especially virulent and life-threatening. This leads to further drug administration, a vicious circle, unfortunately too often resulting in cot death.



Related: The Eradication Of Natural Alternatives: Big Pharma Wants To Eliminate The Competition

The official figure of 2 cot deaths per 1,000 babies is fifty years old, and obsolete. The rate is more like 7-10 per 1,000, otherwise we would not even hear about cot death.

Our records demonstrate that there is a direct causal relationship between injections of DPT and cot deaths. The time has come to call for suspension of all vaccination programs.

 


This post was copied from:  Dr.VieraScheibner / TheVaccineReaction 

Thursday, 9 April 2026

REVERSE AGING

Aging is such a gradual process that we often barely notice the process of doing slightly less day by day until one day we suddenly realise what a decrepit old fart we have become.


Reverse aging is very subtle as well.

Since making a major dietary shift, mainly cutting out all fruit and vegetables, and eating a near carnivore diet for the past two months, I've had a bunch of improvements, some strikingly sudden, but some so subtle I only just realised.

It's not as if I was coming from a "Standard American Diet" (SAD) or anything. For the past 20+ years I've had no gluten, no sugar, no coffee, no alcohol, and no nightshades, as well as being mostly organic and low carb, with no artificial sweeteners or additives. I have also always taken care to drink good quality spring water and avoid fluoridated tap water like the plague.

But I still had some chronic aching, along with poor gut health, and low energy.

After just one day of no fruit I had a huge reduction in hip pain, and after a month of this semi-carnivore diet I was able to markedly increase my previously limited physical activity.
 
My own tendency is often to notice negative things while completely ignoring positives (yes, I know that is not optimum!)
 
 Here are the three biggest changes I've had over the past two months:


1. NO MORE SEIZURES 

The biggest improvement was that I stopped having grand mal seizures.
 
They go back nearly 20 years and for the past four years they had become an almost monthly set back. (That is another story in itself, but I won’t get into that any further here). So far those have now ceased for the longest time in over three years (fingers crossed that continues), and I have high hopes of never having another one.

2. ABLE TO DO MORE EXERCISE

At first I kept noticing how weak, unfit, and tired I was, but what I wasn't noticing that for the first time in over four years I was doing some physical activity every day, rather than only doing something about every three days and spending the rest of my time trying to recover from it.

Now when I do some exercise or physical work I do feel sore and tired afterwards, but the next day, I feel like I’m recovering and becoming stronger. Previously I was getting sorer and feeling weaker for at least two to three days each time.

3. MENTAL IMPROVEMENTS

The third thing that I didn't consciously notice for over a month was my gradual mental improvements. As with the physical stuff what I first noticed was that I was struggling to do things I could do 10 years ago. “I'm turning into an idiot” I thought.

Then I realised that I was attempting to do things at a level I was last at over 10 years ago, which was difficult because I hadn’t been doing them very well for a long time.

Every day now, I'm noticing more, making more connections, improving my skills, and just plain wanting to learn and develop. Previously that had almost stopped happening. Writing a positive summary like this is part of that process.

Yes I realise cutting out fruit and vegetables sounds extreme and sort of mad. We are constantly told they are good for us (notice a reoccurring pattern here?) but I have several friends who have also spectacularly transformed their health by doing just that, and I'm now cautiously giving it a try.
 
The carnivore diet is constantly bashed by the mainstream media as part of their relentless sickness industry mind programing - eg.  "The carnivore diet is a high-protein fad diet in which only animal products such as meat, dairy and eggs are consumed. The carnivore diet is associated with pseudo scientific health claims. The diet lacks dietary fiber, can lead to deficiencies of vitamins, and can increase the risk of chronic diseases". 

Until recently I've always thought that humans are omnivores, but I now seem to be gradually revising that deep seated belief. I'm not fully onboard though. No fruit is a sticking point.
 
While I could happily not eat any vegetables (I never really liked them anyway, apart from kumera), I do miss fruit and hope to be able to reintroduce some of that again, but probably in very limited amounts.

Most days I'm carefully reintroducing one new food and testing the results. Sometimes they seem to be fine so I'm then able to continue to eat something new. One of those foods which tested OK was several forms of dairy which I had been completely avoiding for the past few years. 
 
Several diary foods actually seem to be pretty good for me, such as cheese as long as it's made with animal rennet, but not if it's made with vegetarian rennet, which many cheeses now are. That stuff is like a poison to me, causing severe aching within a day.
 
Mainland Tasty is still made with animal rennet but many cheeses (including most other Mainland cheeses) are not, so check the ingredients carefully. 
 
Some foods that I expected would be OK have been major fails - all coconut products, even good quality pure coconut milk, cause me immediate problems. We used to sell coconut oil and coconut flour so that was an unpleasant surprise!

This is all still a work in progress, but big thanks to 

Joachim Bartoll - https://bartoll.se/nutrition-quickstart/

Max German (NZ) - https://www.youtube.com/@max.german/videos 

for posting so much helpful nutritional information.

Tuesday, 24 March 2026

IMAGINARY MENINGITIS

The next health pysop could be "Meningitis"

What gets me is that it took most people five years to even begin to grasp that convid was a hoax, but all the deep state have to do is change the name of the latest fake disease and they are literally lining up for injections again...

 

I used to think that vaxtards would eventually learn, but no, I no longer think they ever will!


Meningitis is listed as a "side effect" on ALL the covid jabs.  Side effects are big pharmas code words for: We've poisoned you. The polysorbate 80 inside them allows for all the nano-particles of heavy metals within them to cross the blood brain barrier so some can be deposited there.

What we are witnessing now is another problem reaction solution game.  And you can't "catch" meningitis. It develops from an issue already present inside the body as these toxins slowly spread to the brain over time from all the injections. 

They created the problem so they can offer you another poisonous solution in the form of a meningitis jab.

It is not a coincidence that critical thinking, and common sense was directly targeted by all the poisons in these jabs as they destroy all the healthy flora in your gut. Rendering discernment and intuition things of the past. By design.
 

The Meningitis Mystery - Dr. Sam Bailey

Meningitis is widely feared—but what if the story we’ve been told about its causes isn’t backed by solid evidence?

First published in May 2023, this video challenges the mainstream narrative, questions the role of bacteria like Neisseria meningitidis, and explores alternative explanations behind this serious condition. Is meningitis really an infection—or something else entirely?

Full show notes and references 👉 https://drsambailey.com/resources/vid...



Students of stupidity

 

There was a time when university students were regarded as being a more intelligent sector of society. This is clearly no longer the case, as a large number of them are complete morons.

This photo is widely assumed to be from Kent University in England, and it's being used by the English media, but it's still fairly cold in Kent so the photo is either not current or not from there at all.

There is also a Kent University in Ohio USA, where temperatures are cold as well, but photos of summer dressed ques of masked students from either university seem to be reported interchangeably with the location (UK or USA) not being mentioned.

 


I fully expect this bullshit to kick off in New Zealand soon too. 
But this time round I think it will be more confrontational than in 2021. Personally I won't be politely saying "I have an exemption" if any fuckers ask me to wear a mask! 😂

Monday, 2 March 2026

EATING LUBRICANT


How to make "vegetable" oil:

1. Collect seeds (soy, corn, canola, cottonseed)
2. Heat to 200°C to extract oil
3. Add hexane (petroleum solvent also used in glue and varnish) 
4. Boil off most of the hexane (most, not all)
5. Add sodium hydroxide (drain cleaner) to remove impurities
6. Bleach it because it's brown and smells like fish
7. Deodorize it at 250°C because it smells rancid
8. Add synthetic antioxidants to slow down (not prevent) oxidation

Congratulations. You've made a substance that:
- Didn't exist before 1900
- Requires industrial chemicals to produce
- Oxidizes in your body
- Integrates into cell membranes for 600+ days
- Creates inflammation for years

But at least it's from plants. So it must be healthy. Are we not foolish?
"Vegetable oil" is marketing fraud. There are no vegetables in it. It's made from seeds:

- Soybean oil (soybeans are legumes, not vegetables)
- Canola oil (rapeseed, not a vegetable)
- Corn oil (corn is a grain, not a vegetable)
- Sunflower oil (sunflower seeds, not vegetables)
- Safflower oil (safflower seeds, not vegetables)

If they called it "seed oil" or "industrial waste oil" you wouldn't buy it. So they call it "vegetable oil" and put vegetables on the label. It's not from vegetables. It's from seeds processed with industrial chemicals.
The name is designed to make you think you're consuming plants. You're consuming chemically-extracted, bleached, deodorized polyunsaturated fat that's been heat-damaged before you even open the bottle.
 
But "vegetable" sounds healthy. That's the entire con. Linguistic fraud to sell industrial waste as health food. Seed oils were invented as machine lubricants, and only later as cooking oil.

 Professor George Dr.




Now this machine lubricant makes up 30% of American's daily calories. Racks up oxidative stress even if "cold-pressed". Promotes inflammation, insulin resistance and fat storage. Breaks down into carcinogenic byproducts even at body temperature. And has zero nutritional value. Yet, it's somehow the healthy alternative to animal fats . What a joke!

How to read ingredient labels:
See: Soybean oil -> Put it back
See: Canola oil -> Put it back
See: Sunflower oil -> Put it back
See: Heart healthy-> Put it back
See: Corn oil -> Put it back
See: Cottonseed oil -> Put it back
See: "Vegetable oil" - > Put it back
See: "Vegetable oil blend" -> Run away
See: Butter, tallow, lard -> Buy immediately

 
 

Tuesday, 17 February 2026

MIND CONTROLLED DOCTORS

Renowned Doctor Slams Medical Education & Says We Have “An Epidemic Of Misinformed Doctors”

Dr. Asseem Malhotra is known as one of the most influential cardiologists in Britain and a world-leading expert in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of heart disease. 



Currently, he is leading a huge campaign against excess sugar consumption. What also makes him unique is something he recently admitted took him decades to figure out: that our entire medical system, one of the main ‘protectors’ of the human race, is completely corrupt.

Related: After Working ‘Every Single Day For 30 Years’ This Couple Gets Screwed By American Healthcare System At The End

He now believes that medical education is a state of “complete system failure,” causing “an epidemic of misinformed doctors.” 

He also stated that honest doctors can no longer practice honest medicine, and that there is also a growing epidemic of patients who are being harmed.

There is no denying that to some extent, medicine and doctors have done a lot of good and saved a lot of lives. However, an over-reliance on doctors for our health and well-being has spawned a serious problem, one that should be in the spotlight and immediately fixed.


The Need To Think For Ourselves

We all have to realize that society has been manufactured in a way where we simply give up our own mind to someone else, who has been given theirs by someone else. We lack the ability to think for ourselves because, from birth, we are programmed to think a certain way by somebody else.

This is something important for us to change, and by ‘us’ I not only mean patients; it should be a priority for all who practice medicine. And there are signs that it has started changing.



Related: The Corruption Of Evidence Based Medicine - Killing For Profit

Why? Because there is a shift in consciousness taking place.

People within all societal systems (health, financial, education, government, etc.) are waking up, and starting to investigate what they have been taught.

Rather than simply believing the promotional literature, more are pursuing self-education (which Dr. Malhotra stressed was the only real form of education).

Malhotra pointed out seven ‘sins’ that contribute to the lack of knowledge that not just doctors but everyone has, including patients, regarding modern day ‘medicine.’ 

He made these comments at a recent European Parliament meeting:



Related: Fluoridation Is Mass Medication, New Zealand Supreme Court Rules


Other Prominent Doctors Speak Out

He’s not the only one to speak up about this issue. In fact, it seems that those who represent doctors have been speaking out about this for a long time. 

Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), considered one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, has said that;


"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

- Source

Then there is Dr. Richard Horton, the current Editor-in-Chief of another prestigious peer-reviewed medical journal, The Lancet, who says,“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”


What is Medicine’s 5 Sigma? [Full Article]

“A lot of what is published is incorrect.” I’m not allowed to say who made this remark because we were asked
to observe Chatham House rules.

We were also asked not to take photographs of slides. Those who worked for government agencies pleaded that their comments especially remain unquoted, since the forthcoming UK election meant they were living in “purdah” - a chilling state where severe restrictions on freedom of speech are placed on anyone on the government’s payroll.

Why the paranoid concern for secrecy and non-attribution?

Related: Is Psychiatry Bullshit? Some Psychiatrists View The Chemical-Imbalance Theory As A Well-Meaning Lie + Psychotropic Drugs, Are They Safe? Fourteen Lies That Our Psychiatry Professors Taught Us In Medical School

Because this symposium - on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research, held at the Wellcome Trust in London last week - touched on one of the most sensitive issues in science today: the idea that something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations.

The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.

Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant confl icts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.

As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices.

The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data.



Related: The Flawed Germ Theory; Unfortunately The Basis Of Modern Medicine

Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale. We reject important confirmations.

Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent, endpoints that foster reductive metrics, such as high-impact publication.

National assessment procedures, such as the Research Excellence Framework, incentivise bad practices. And individual scientists, including their most senior leaders, do little to alter a research culture that occasionally veers close to misconduct.


Can Bad Scientific Practices be Fixed?

Part of the problem is that no-one is incentivised to be right. Instead, scientists are incentivised to be productive and innovative. Would a Hippocratic Oath for science help?

Certainly don’t add more layers of research red-tape. Instead of changing incentives, perhaps one could remove incentives altogether. Or insist on replicability statements in grant applications and research papers.

Or emphasise collaboration, not competition. Or insist on preregistration of protocols. Or reward better pre and post publication peer review.



Related: Why Does Modern Medicine Have A Big Problem With Natural Health?

Or improve research training and mentorship. Or implement the recommendations from our Series on increasing research value, published last year.

One of the most convincing proposals came from outside the biomedical community. Tony Weidberg is a Professor of Particle Physics at Oxford. Following several high-profi le errors, the particle physics community now invests great eff ort into intensive checking and re-checking of data prior to publication.

By filtering results through independent working groups, physicists are encouraged to criticise. Good criticism is rewarded. The goal is a reliable result, and the incentives for scientists are aligned around this goal. Weidberg worried we set the bar for results in biomedicine far too low.

In particle physics, signifi cance is set at 5 sigma - a p value of 3 × 10 to the power of 7 or 1 in 3·5 million (if the result is not true, this is the probability that the data would have been as extreme as they are).



Related: Here’s How Industry-Funded “Research” Is Making Us Sick And Fat + Like Tobacco And Big Pharma, The Sugar Industry Has Manipulated Research For 50 Years

The conclusion of the symposium was that something must be done. Indeed, all seemed to agree that it was within our power to do that something.

But as to precisely what to do or how to do it, there were no firm answers. Those who have the power to act seem to think somebody else should act fi rst. And every positive action (eg, funding well-powered replications) has a counterargument (science will become less creative).

The good news is that science is beginning to take some of its worst failings very seriously. The bad news is that nobody is ready to take the first step to clean up the system.


Related Articles:

Top 10 Food And Medicine Myths You Probably Fell For At Some Point + How The Mind Treats “Impossible Things That Couldn’t Be Happening”

Modern Life Is Killing Our Children: UK Cancer Rate In Young People Up 40% In 16 Years + 12 Things A Cancer Doctor Should Never Say

The Tide Is Turning: Big Pharma Billionaire Arrested, Charged With Conspiracy And Bribery Of Doctors

Peer Reviewed 'Science' Losing Credibility Due To Fraudulent Research & Manufacturing Consent In Science: The Diabolical Twist


This is a lightly edited copy & paste of a post by SGT REPORT That was originally posted here:  https://www.sgtreport.com/2018/09/renowned-doctor-slams-medical-education-says-we-have-an-epidemic-of-misinformed-doctors/

 

SIFT TOP 10 MOST POPULAR BLOG POSTS THIS WEEK