SIFT TOP 5 MOST POPULAR BLOG POSTS THIS WEEK - Scroll down to see the latest posts

Showing posts with label misinformation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misinformation. Show all posts

Saturday, 17 January 2026

DDT IS GOOD FOR ME

In our deranged post covidhoax world, there is often an attitude of "things were better in the good old days", but in actual fact the programing and misinformation has long been just as full on as it is now.

These 10 old adverts are mind boggling examples:

 “Sugar might just be the willpower you need to curb your appetite”

1. Junk Food, Now Fortified with Vitamins and Minerals

Disguising empty calories with healthful nutritional values has been a trope of the processed food world ever since vitamins were first discovered in the 1910s. 

This 1942 poster for “Vitamin Donuts” may be a little hard to swallow today, but Ovaltine’s reputation as a health drink is still being disputed, a powerful testament to simple brand positioning. But let’s be real, we’re talking about powdered chocolate milk made by Nestlé, the company who brought us such healthy foods as Butterfinger candy bars and Häagen-Dazs ice cream.

The Ovaltine ad from 1947 still boggles the mind with its display of so many nutritional perks packed into two glasses of powdered milk, and seems eerily similar to the many supposed benefits contained in drinks like Vitamin Water or Gatorade. In reality, even the benefits of ordinary vitamin supplements are now being questioned, despite the fact that around half of American adults take them regularly.

2. Let Them Eat Lead

The painful part of this ad is its emphasis on kid's enjoyment of a lead paint party; part of the reason children ingested the dangerous product was it's sweet flavor (see above).

The most heartbreaking part of this 1923 brochure is its emphasis on kids having fun with the whole “Lead Family” of products, whose presence in everything from their nursery walls to their windup toys made young children particularly susceptible to its dangers. Combined with lead paint’s seductively sweet flavor, putting kids in environments literally covered with the stuff was a recipe for disaster.

In fact, the effects of lead poisoning (brain damage, seizures, hypertension, etc.) were known long before the Consumer Product Safety Commission finally banned them in 1977; the industry had simply refused to acknowledge them.  

An article by Jack Lewis published in the EPA Journal in 1985 covers lead’s history as an additive and poison, and how we’ve consistently downplayed its adverse effects. Lewis writes:

“The Romans were aware that lead could cause serious health problems, even madness and death. However, they were so fond of its diverse uses that they minimized the hazards it posed. Romans of yesteryear, like Americans of today, equated limited exposure to lead with limited risk.”

3. 7-Up is good for Babies

Not only were sugary soft-drinks great for adults, but sodas like 7-Up used to help babies grow up strong and fit, or so these ads from 1955 and 1953 would have you believe. That’s pretty disturbing, considering that childhood obesity, linked arm-in-arm with massive soda intake, is shortening our youngest generation’s lifespan. The high amount of refined sugar in soda has also been shown to be particularly harmful for children.

Today it seems crazy to show a baby drinking a soda, as the tide finally turns against the sugary drinks: School districts across the nation have removed soda machines from their schools and New York City’s Board of Health has proposed a ban on over-sized sodas. However, many adults today opt to serve kids “healthy” fruit juice, which may be just as bad, despite its deceptive nutritional marketing.

4. Cigarettes: Just What the Doctor Ordered

Camel’s campaign featuring doctor endorsements is probably the most familiar instance of false advertising, seen here in an ad from 1948. Yet almost every cigarette company twisted science to support its products, including Chesterfield’s 1953 ads, which rephrased expert findings to show that smoking had “no adverse effect.” Long after 1950, when Morton Levin published his definitive study linking smoking to lung cancer, experts continued to imply that there were other factors causing cancer and lung disease.

Though the industry has been seriously weakened over the past 20 years, primarily by government regulation, Big Tobacco is still issuing misleading health information in an attempt to reap a profit.

5. Feminine Hygiene: The Original Home Wrecker

Long before Lysol was reinvented as the caustic household cleaner we know today, the same substance was basically promoted for use as a feminine hygiene product. These Lysol ads from 1948 tout the internal use of poisonous Lysol as a marriage saver. To sum up the message: if you weren’t so dirty down there, he would love you more.

In a time when speaking about sex was even more frowned upon than today, a whole spectrum of sexual products, including vibrators and contraceptives, was marketed with campaigns focusing on their dubious health benefits for women.

6. Plastics, Plastics, Everywhere

Suffocating babies in Cellophane! A bunch of infants tied up in clear cellophane packaging is pretty frightening to modern viewers, but at the time, these ads were just plain cute. When these Du Pont Cellophane ads came out in 1954, things like plastic grocery bags weren’t a ubiquitous part of American culture. 

Only after plastic bags became widespread during the 1970s did their strangulating qualities become frighteningly clear.

7. You're right in liking meat 

At least this one was good advice, but it wasn't very fashionable in 2012 when the appalling low fat high carb diet craze was all the rage

In post-World War II America, eating more red meat seemed like a great way to keep yourself “in trim,” at least according to these two ads, from 1956 and 1946. Like other food fads, this campaign was orchestrated by the American Meat Institute, a lobbying group that is still working to improve public and political opinion toward its products. 

Maybe that’s why almost nobody in America knows that nutritionists generally recommend only 2-3 servings of red meat per week. And don’t get the experts started on sodium nitrite in processed meat.

We now know that eating too much meat increases the risk of heart disease and cancer. Yet industry trade groups are still creating food trends to spur sales or combat negative public stereotypes: Think of modern wonder-foods like agave nectar or chia seeds that seemed to appear from the heavens, as well as the bitterly argued corn syrup campaign.

8. Dieting? Try Sugar

In a time before the current widespread obesity epidemic, sugar companies wanted shoppers to believe that a sweet treat would somehow inspire you to eat less. These ads from 1969 coach readers to “have a soft drink before your main meal” or “snack on some candy an hour before lunch.” 

Their strange logic isn’t even backed by a company name, though the campaign does include a helpful mailing address for “Sugar Information.” Talk about creepy.

Now refined sugar is presented as the dieter’s enemy, and is thought to make you want to eat more rather than less.

9. Shock Your Way to Physical Perfection

In 1922, “Violet Rays” were said to cure pretty much anything that ailed you. This Vi-Rex device plugged into a light socket so users could give themselves home shock-treatments, which would supposedly make you “vital, compelling, and magnetic.” Various recalls and lawsuits erupted throughout the U.S., forcing the FDA to finally prohibit their manufacture. The last batch of Violet Ray products was seized in 1951.


10. DDT is good for you and me

This ad for “Penn Salt Chemicals” from 1947 shows a range of dangerous applications for now-illegal DDT, from agricultural sprays to household pesticides. Particularly disturbing is the image of a mother and infant, above the caption stating that DDT “helps make healthier, more comfortable homes.” Not quite.

While effective in eliminating dangerous mosquitoes that carry malaria, DDT also has a variety of hazardous effects: Especially among young children, the chemical has been shown to damage the nervous, immune, endocrine, and neurological systems, not to mention its devastating influence on the natural environment. 

The spread of DDT across mid-century America is mirrored today by the success of Monsanto (one of the companies that originally manufactured DDT) in placing its genetically modified products on store shelves before researchers have a full understanding of their larger ecological impacts.

 

 This content is an updated copy of a post from 2012: the-top-10-most-dangerous-ads

Thursday, 11 December 2025

FEAR THE TRUTH

In Wellington today the high court locked the public out of the Barry Young hearing that would expose the truth about the death jabs because they fear the truth...

"Barry Young, who leaked anonymized New Zealand health data showing the COVID vaccines were killing people, goes on trial on Dec 11, 2025 in the Wellington District Court at 9am. Please come there and support him!!! This is a pre-trial hearing (judge alone).

Barry Young faces charges under section 249 of the Crimes Act 1961 for dishonestly accessing or using a computer system (specifically, for leaking COVID-19 vaccination data). He faces a maximum sentence of 7 years in prison for his “crime” of warning the public about the serious dangers of the COVID vaccine.

He basically made public health data public without violating anyone’s privacy. For that, they want to imprison him for 7 years, even though no one was harmed.

This is because making public health data public can only lead to better health outcomes because if you don’t do that, nobody can analyze the data to learn the truth.

It’s criminal to actually expose public health data to the public. It has to remain secret to protect the vaccine makers and no analysis should ever be done by the public health officials. We are all expected to trust the science and it is forbidden to actually verify that the science was done right."

 https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/barry-youngs-criminal-trial-continues-on-thursday-dec-11-wellington-district-court-in-new-zealand-at-9am/


Under endlessly geoengineered skies a crowd of supporters stood outside today, but the hearing was closed to the public. This whistleblower case is being watched from all around the world.


 

Tuesday, 25 November 2025

SUBSCRIBE TO FORBES

Forbes do really in depth crypto research, and charge a premium for their deep insights 😂 

"Following the latest rally, bitcoin may have bottomed out, according to the YouTuber who goes by Wendy O" 

Yeah, that "person" looks fully legit...

Trust Forbes, they can tell the difference between Elon Musk & Mark Zuckerberg...

Wednesday, 1 October 2025

HAPPY NEW MONTH

Today is the first day of a new month. At least it is here in New Zealand, but we lead the world in that sort of thing and a lot of you may have to wait another day to catch up. 

That dawning sense of anticipation used to feel like a monthly treat, but this year everything seems to have sped up and new months are almost a weekly event.

  
One of my hobbies is digging into rabbit holes, and there have been no shortage of those to look at lately. Usually I'm all keen to do blog posts about all the fake stories I uncover, but I'm holding back a bit at the moment.

Last month there were some spectacularly obvious psyops like the Charlie Kirk fake shooting which rivaled last year's Donald Trumps ear shooting for being one of the all time stupidest looking psyops ever to come out of America, land of the bad psyop.

I usually sort of enjoy pointing out what a bunch of gullible retards other people are, but I'm not so keen on the sinking feeling of a slow dawning realisation of having believed a story hook line and sinker that is increasingly looking to be at least partially fake.

As of today I'm not even going to mention the two narratives I'm currently looking into, partly because I still need to do more research, and partly because discussing them publicly could well be quite unproductive.

And yes, it's also because I just don't really want to admit I may have been suckered. I'm not yet sure of the full extent of the deceptions, these are both fairly complex, and to me at least, they always seemed pretty convincing. 

Both stories go back more than a decade, I have long been engaged with them myself, and until this year I mostly believed them hook line and sinker.

As usual there is big money involved, and with one of them that includes some of my own. So I'm going to shut my face for now and just say this: very few things are as they seem, and it is highly unlikely that any of us are not being played to some extent.

So we really can't base our happiness on the illusion that we are too smart to be conned, can we?

 

Monday, 29 September 2025

ZOOM IN

 Just about everything we are being shown in the "media" is fake - that is nothing new, but the extent of the fakeness is becoming a running joke. And by "media" I don't just mean the "mainstream media" - the "alternative media" is mostly utter crap as well.

This is just the first crowd picture that came up in a quick search - Mexico in 2023 - all these pictures of crowds look impressive at a glance, but try having a closer look and they could be anything... 

We are being bombarded with stories of massive protests at the moment. But many of the protests that we are being shown at the moment are fake - they are using CGI for most of those huge crowd shots. 

Like AI, the use of CGI is constant now, but hardly anyone ever checks. Photos of huge crowds, fires, wars, bombings, & just about everything else that is being reported are constantly being faked using CGI. And it's not even good CGI, most of it is rubbish, try zooming in!

 


 

Thursday, 25 September 2025

SNAKE EYES

The Charlie Kirk psyop is so obvious the question is not so much "was it a psyop?" (yes of course it was), but why did they go to so much trouble to make it blindingly obvious? 

 

I don't think this is an absolutely appalling fake shooting, so much as some very cunning social engineering, with the story rapidly being exposed, and completely falling apart, being an integral part of that.

In the 1998 movie Snake Eyes (1998=666×3), a politician named Charles Kirkland gets assassinated by a shot in neck on the September 10th (same day Charlie Kirk was "shot"). 

In the movie, Lincoln Tyler (whose nickname is "The Executioner") was in a boxing match filmed at Trump's Taj Mahal Hotel during the shooting. In the Charlie Kirk "shooting," the alleged executioner is named Tyler Robinson.

 This is predictive programing dating back 27 years. It's like The Simpsons or something! They love to do this. Why?






 
The Snake Eyes movie plot:

"Rick suspects a conspiracy. He deduces that the sniper, a known Palestinian terrorist named Tarik Ben Rabat, assassinated Kirkland over the Pentagon's large-scale defense cooperation with and weapons systems transfers to Israel. 🥹
 


Tuesday, 16 September 2025

IT'S ALL FAKE

 Looking at my Facebook feed this week, I'm not going to say anything more than this: I have never seen so much bullshit in one go. I'll just share this meme from "The Truman Show" which was in itself a psyop, as most Hollywood movies are, but yes, if you believe the crap you are being told, then you are going to be very misled...🥹

 











 


Thursday, 11 September 2025

IT'S 911 TODAY

Pretty much all "news" is fake so this is not a particularly bold claim.

The latest American "news" story will soon be proven to be just as fake as they all are. But for the record I just want to get in early and call bullshit on the latest moronic American psyop.

Charlie Kirk was supposedly shot in the neck today. And it's 911 today by the way.  

Do normies really believe this crap? 


Yes, they probably do, after all they fell for the unbelievably fake attempted Trump assassination last year hook line and sinker, so they will probably lap this story up as well. Trump's background hosting World Wrestling Federation (WWF) is proving really handy!
 
 
 
But the story must be true because Snopes has "fact checked" it 😂