The Charlie Kirk psyop is so obvious the question is not so much "was it a psyop?" (yes of course it was), but why did they go to so much trouble to make it blindingly obvious?
I don't think this is an absolutely appalling fake shooting, so much as some very cunning social engineering, with the story rapidly being exposed, and completely falling apart, being an integral part of that.
In the 1998 movie Snake Eyes (1998=666×3), a politician named Charles Kirkland gets assassinated by a shot in neck on the September 10th (same day Charlie Kirk was "shot").
In the movie, Lincoln Tyler (whose nickname is "The Executioner") was in a boxing match filmed at Trump's Taj Mahal Hotel during the shooting. In the Charlie Kirk "shooting," the alleged executioner is named Tyler Robinson.
This is predictive programing dating back 27 years. It's like The Simpsons or something! They love to do this. Why?
"Rick suspects a conspiracy. He deduces that the sniper, a known Palestinian terrorist named Tarik Ben Rabat, assassinated Kirkland over the Pentagon's large-scale defense cooperation with and weapons systems transfers to Israel. 🥹
