FUNNY BUT SERIOUS

 It's Sunday today, so it must be time for a dozen LOLPICS. These are sort of serious as well, but I'm trying to kill two birds with one stone here!

 

TOTALLY INSANE

The almost constant use of the word "INSANE", particularly by Americans is getting insane...

On sites like YouTube every second video seems to have the word insane in the title.

This is how social programming often works. What is the effect on an already unhinged population of constantly referring to everything as INSANE?

It is highly unlikely to make people more calm, rational, thoughtful, calculating, logical, balanced, intelligent or well researched is it?

But make them more susceptible to submitting to globalist control? Yeah, that could work... 

BRAVE SEARCH

The brave search engine was recommended to me so I gave it a quick test - is it any good? - no, it's utter crap like all the others - they are all providing only selected approved content, it just depends who's AI is doing the approving. 

I do use the Brave browser as my default internet browser, and it's pretty good. I'd actually rather have Floorp, the Japanese Firefox privacy fork as my default, but sometimes I find a Chromium based browser works better, so I tend to swap back and forth between Brave and Floorp, leaving both browsers open all day.

 

But honestly, I gave the Brave search engine a few tries, thought it was hopeless, and soon went back to swapping between Yandex and DuckDuckGo. They are both far from perfect, but I've come to think that there is no such thing a one size fits all search engine, just avoid Google like the plague!.

Here is an example - trying out DuckDuckGo, vs Brave, vs Yandax, by asking if "Michelle Obama" is a transvestite. Obviously he is, because Michael Robinson is a man, so search censorship doesn't get much more blatant than this example.

 

 DuckDuckGo is my basic go to search engine in most browsers - it's there ready to go, it's better than the appalling Google, and it sort of works. But showing it here displaying propaganda from "Snopes" as it's first answer reveals what utter crap DuckDuckGo actually is.

 

Next, how did Brave compare? It's even more useless, just coming up with a moronic AI approved narrative response and showing itself to a complete waste of space.

 

As expected Yandex was far more helpful, it included lots of pictures of Michael Robinson's cock sticking out the front of his dress, and didn't try to brush this huge white elephant under the carpet. 

Yandex is generally a far better search engine for finding any non approved content, as long as it doesn't involve secrets about Russia! 

 

BAFFLING

 If the people who pushed "vaccinations" during the covidhoax were now regularly dropping dead from heart attacks, or dying slowly from cancer, would anyone notice or make the connection?

Nigel Latta died of cancer two days ago, aged 58. Throughout the covidhoax he was pushing the death jabs heavily on TV. "Doctors" will undoubtedly be baffled as to why injecting poisons into anyone would lead to cancer, so won't make any connections here... 

 
"Psychologist Nigel Latta has weighed in on the psychology behind the anti-vaccination campaign as a measles outbreak takes hold in Christchurch. Parents of unvaccinated children are being urged to keep them out of school, so they don't spread the disease.
 
TVNZ1's Seven Sharp asked Latta why do people jump on board the anti-vax hysteria?
"If it was just about facts everyone would vaccinate their children, because if your child catches measles they have a one in 1000 chance of dying from it.
"However, if they have a vaccine there is a one in one million chance of having a serious reaction to the vaccine and dying," Mr Latta said.

He then went on to say the anti-vaxers are good at creating "fear" on social media and normally rationale people buy into the idea. 

 

"Our brains have an emotional reaction to stuff first, and people will say it either feels right or I don't have a good feeling about vaccinations. 

 

"It shouldn't be about feelings it should be about the numbers, the numbers overwhelmingly say that you should vaccinate your children," Mr Latta said. 

 

On the situation in Christchurch, Latta says there are people putting their own children and others at risk by not getting their kids vaccinated and letting them go to school.

He likened anti-vax campaigners to being as legitimate as those at the Flat Earth Society.

Fourteen thousand does of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine are now being distributed to Christchurch general practices as the number of confirmed cases of measles has risen to 28 nearly three weeks after the outbreak began."

HAPPY NEW MONTH

Today is the first day of a new month. At least it is here in New Zealand, but we lead the world in that sort of thing and a lot of you may have to wait another day to catch up. 

That dawning sense of anticipation used to feel like a monthly treat, but this year everything seems to have sped up and new months are almost a weekly event.

  
One of my hobbies is digging into rabbit holes, and there have been no shortage of those to look at lately. Usually I'm all keen to do blog posts about all the fake stories I uncover, but I'm holding back a bit at the moment.

Last month there were some spectacularly obvious psyops like the Charlie Kirk fake shooting which rivaled last year's Donald Trumps ear shooting for being one of the all time stupidest looking psyops ever to come out of America, land of the bad psyop.

I usually sort of enjoy pointing out what a bunch of gullible retards other people are, but I'm not so keen on the sinking feeling of a slow dawning realisation of having believed a story hook line and sinker that is increasingly looking to be at least partially fake.

As of today I'm not even going to mention the two narratives I'm currently looking into, partly because I still need to do more research, and partly because discussing them publicly could well be quite unproductive.

And yes, it's also because I just don't really want to admit I may have been suckered. I'm not yet sure of the full extent of the deceptions, these are both fairly complex, and to me at least, they always seemed pretty convincing. 

Both stories go back more than a decade, I have long been engaged with them myself, and until this year I mostly believed them hook line and sinker.

As usual there is big money involved, and with one of them that includes some of my own. So I'm going to shut my face for now and just say this: very few things are as they seem, and it is highly unlikely that any of us are not being played to some extent.

So we really can't base our happiness on the illusion that we are too smart to be conned, can we?