
What nature of scam is this? The official story is that Mt. Gox was a bitcoin exchange based in Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan, that was launched in 2010.
It claimed that hundreds of thousands of bitcoin—back then worth around $400 million, now worth $45 billion had been stolen in an elaborate heist. It had practically no remaining funds with which to process withdrawals.
Moving on 10 years and the story is that the Mt. Gox estate is now sitting on 200,000 bitcoin that has been recovered from a “forgotten” wallet, previously assumed by the exchange to be empty, but that had not been drained by the hackers.
Like most official stories, it's unlikely that any of this is true, so I won't even get into any of that side of things. What is interesting is the effect that this upcoming mass dumping of Bitcoin is having on the market right now in July 2024.
Not surprisingly the entire crypto market has had a big drop. I have long suspected that crypto markets are being constantly manipulated up and down by big investors like Blackrock with the goal of enabling them to buy low and sell high.
Or, given that they know in advance when each rise or fall will be, they don't even need to do that, because they can profit on the drops as well. As they are manipulating all the rises and falls, they always know what is coming.
This entire story sounds to me about as legitimate as the moon landing, or 911, or covid. But it makes no difference, the crypto markets are getting spanked right now.
Fluoride is also absorbed through the skin so unless you have full household filtration you are absorbing it every time you shower...
Yesterday I posted a link to a Joy Division playing their song "Transmission" on a friends Facebook timeline - I described it as "The tightest performance of all time"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dBt3mJtgJc
Sodium fluoride, a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of aluminum, is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics, hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, and military nerve gas. It’s historically been quite expensive to properly dispose of, until some aluminum industries with an overabundance of the stuff sold the public on the insane but highly profitable idea of selling it at a 20,000% markup, injecting it into our water supplies, and then forcing the public to DRINK it.
Question
for today - Would you wear these sunglasses if they could guarantee to
make you 0.000000001% more aerodynamic in the Tour de France, or would
you be fearful that they may cause people to laugh uncontrollably and
call you a numpty?
Most toothpastes contain fluoride, supposedly to prevent tooth decay. Sadly, the majority of consumers fall for this con and poison themselves even further by applying it to their teeth.
Any amount of fluoride in water exceeding 2 ppm (parts per million) would be considered unsafe. But fluoridated toothpastes have been found to contain levels of up to 7000 ppm. Even the U.S. FDA now regards fluoride in toothpaste as a potential toxic drug.
One of the most common symptoms of excess fluoride is “dental fluorosis”. You will see chalky white patches on the teeth making teeth “spotty”. Enamels can also become more porous with use of fluoridated toothpaste leading to discoloration of the teeth and pitting of the enamel.
Young children tend to apply lots toothpaste to their toothbrush, and then swallow plenty of it. (Swallowing half a tube of fluoride toothpaste in one go can be fatal)
Fluoride in the mouth is absorbed through our mucous lining and accumulates in our bodies just like fluoride that has been swallowed. The accumulated fluoride is carcinogenic and harmful to our metabolic systems. It leads to increased hip fractures, osteoporosis, arthritis and lowered brain function.
Another harmful ingredient in toothpaste is sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) – a foam building substance known to be cancer causing.
And in addition, virtually all toothpastes contain glycerine. Glycerine coats the teeth, so that they can’t remineralise to heal tooth decay
The basic requirements for remineralising teeth are:
A nutrient dense, whole food, Weston A Price type diet, including:
Bone broths & marrow
Cod liver oil
Butter oil, or lots of good quality butter
Good quality animal foods
Fermented foods
Fluoride free water
A fluoride free, glycerine free tooth cleaner
Tap water in NZ is toxic because it contains fluoride, chlorine, aluminium (alum), and in some cases (where there are old water pipes) asbestos as well
It’s not just drinking the tap water that’s a problem – bathing and showering in it leads to fluoride and chlorine absorption too.
A good household carbon filter will take out chlorine, asbestos, and aluminium, but it will not take out fluoride. This can be done, but it requires a much more expensive filtration system (around NZ$2000-4000) to sort out your water for bathing and showering.
Reverse osmosis filters and distillers will get most of the fluoride out for drinking, but they remove the good minerals too, and this may cause other problems.
If you are unable to obtain water free from a good source, and have to buy bottled water, keep in mind that some bottled water is just tap water that’s been filtered to get rid of the chlorine taste, while some bottled spring water is good quality.
In Wellington, clean drinking water is freely available directly from the Petone Aquifer
And there is another aquifer at the Dowse Art Museum taps in Lower Hutt
For smaller amounts, and they ask customers not to take more than 2L at a time so it's not the spot for filling up a few hundred liters of bottles, there is also an artesian fountain at the Moore Wilson's store corner of Tory & College Streets Wellington.
A major US government study on fluoride damage to the brain should have ended fluoridation in New Zealand.
Reducing tooth decay is the excuse the globalist governments use when poisoning the water supply. That lie falls apart as soon as any real research is done.
Fluorides and dental fluorosis are actually associated with increased tooth decay. The most comprehensive US review was carried out by the National Institute of Dental Research on 39,000 school children aged 5-17 years. It showed no significant differences in terms of DMF (decayed, missing and filled teeth).
What it did show was that high decay cities (66.5-87.5 percent) have 9.34 percent more decay in the children who drink fluoridated water. Furthermore, a 5.4 percent increase in students with decay was observed when 1 ppm fluoride was added to the water supply. Nine fluoridated cities with high decay had 10 percent more decay than nine equivalent non-fluoridated cities.
The world’s largest study on dental caries, which looked at 400,000 students, revealed that decay increased 27 percent with a 1ppm fluoride increase in drinking water. In Japan, fluoridation caused decay increases of 7 percent in 22,000 students,while in the US a decay increase of 43 percent occurred in 29,000 students when 1ppm fluoride was added to drinking water.
https://www.westonaprice.org/fluoride-worse-than-we-thought
The European Court of Justice ruled in 2009 that fluoridated water must be treated as a medicine, and cannot be used to prepare foods, so Europe could technically block foods imported from Australia, NZ, USA and Ireland at any time.
After
decades of pro-fluoride propaganda in the New Zealand media, there are a
lot of people here who still think that fluoridation is widespread. But
outside of America, the practice is rare. In most countries it is
illegal.
Fluoride Free Awareness Month |
For the first time, FLUORIDE FREE NZ are embarking on a Fluoride Free Awareness Month.
We hope to enlist as many people as possible to commit to posting one item about fluoride on any social media outlet every day for the whole month. By having a concerted effort to spread the evidence about water fluoridation, more people will become informed and concerned about it. It turns out that Dr Diana Sarfati's (Director-General of Health) threats to enforce huge fines on councils who don't comply to her unlawful demand to add fluoridation chemicals to local water supplies may have been nothing more than HOT AIR.
In a court hearing on Wednesday, the lawyer for the DG advised the judge that there was no indication the DG was intending to enforce any fines on non-compliant councils. We believe this is a tacit commitment from Sarfati not to embark on enforcement, at least not until the Bill of Rights analysis has been completed. Even after that we do not believe that she would be able to enforce any fines until the legal case by New Health New Zealand has been completed.
See the FFNZ press release for more detail. |
Today
is is the first of July and as well as the Tour de France having just
started, July is Fluoride Free Awareness Month, so let's see if we can
use social media to wake up a few sheeple to the fact that it's not only
chemtrails that are being used to poison us - https://fluoridefree.org.nz/fluoride-free-awareness.../