THE JET FUEL HOAX

THE WHEELS ARE FALLING OFF MANY STORIES, and as more of us are realising that pretty much everything we have been told is part of an ever accelerating false official narrative that goes back hundreds, if not thousands of years, more and more new topics are becoming sucked into the vortex of subjects now open for discussion. 

Having been looking into into "conspiracy theories" for many years I sometimes forget what a buzz it is watching a brand new pile of bollocks imploding. I had never really given much thought to how much jet fuel commercial airliners actually use. But then some greentards started going on about Boeing 747's using 300000 liters of fuel per flight, and I thought "hang on a minute, how much would that weigh, and where on earth would they put it?"

It was no problem to find some figures online (although these do all seem to vary a bit depending on which website they are from):

A Boeing 747-400 (a popular large passenger plane for 30 years from 1990 to 2020) has an empty weight of 181,000 kg and a maximum takeoff weight of 397,000 kg. (an Airbus A380 is even bigger)

Jet fuel weighs 0.8kg per liter.

A 747-400's fuel capacity is 216,840 liters (so not really 300,000) which would weigh  216,840 x 0.8 = 173,472 kg

The combined empty weight plus fuel would come to 181,000 + 173,472 = 354,472 kg

But that is without any passengers, crew, or cargo. A 747-400 holds between 416 to 524 passengers, and typically has around 20 crew members (this varies by airline, many have more)

A typical average passenger weight including carry-on luggage is 84 kg, so with 416 passengers that would come to 416 x 84 = 34944 kg

So with no crew, and no cargo, just the weight of the bare plane plus fuel and passengers, weighs 389,416 kg - THAT IS ALREADY CLOSE TO THE MAXIMUM TAKE OFF WEIGHT OF 397,000 kg

Now let's estimate the crew members are slightly lighter than the passengers, averaging 75 kg each including their carry on bags, and with no heavy extra luggage, so they would only add another 20 x 75 = 1500 kg

But then we get to cargo - each of those 416 passengers has luggage which averages (depending on who is weighing it) around 15 - 20 kg per passenger, so it's at least 416 x 15 = 6240 kg

Now we are up to Plane 181,000 kg + Fuel 173,472 kg + Passengers 34944 kg + Crew 1500 kg + Luggage 6240 kg = 397,156 kg

NOW WE HAVE ALREADY EXCEEDED THE MAXIMUM TAKE OFF WEIGHT, JUST USING CONSERVATIVE MINIMUMS & NO EXTRAS INCLUDED

What is going on here?

These short videos are entertaining intros to the rabbit hole of how jet engines really work 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXRmcumPL3k&t=3s 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFlAutyo-Q8

I have no idea what is "true" here, but there are a bunch of suspicious red flags about fuel usage, including the way the engines are mounted forward of the wings, and the fact that the wings on crashed airliners are often intact.

eg. This is a picture of the wreckage of Nigeria Airways Flight 2120, which crashed July, 1991 on its way from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to Sokoto, Nigeria. 

Is something strange going on?

 

NO DOUBT

THERE IS NO DOUBT GWEN STEFANI LOOKS LIKE A TRANNY

Gwen Stefani is an American singer and songwriter who came to fame in the 1990s as the lead singer for the band No Doubt, before starting a solo career.

 

Was she a MTF invert deceiving the masses and in particular young women, promoting body image and identity issues? Stefani sometimes seemed sad and tortured in her lyrics, which possibly alluded to her struggles with being an invert in disguise.

This is a hard call, and I'm on the fence about this. She was no Taylor Swift (an obvious MTF) but something does not look right here.

 

 

When "I'm Just a Girl" came out in 1995 I thought it was great, but the messages in the video went totally over my head. Watching it now, the lyrics, Gwen Stafani's mannish looks, and all those images of urinals and public toilets, are not lost on me! Still a good song though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHzOOQfhPFg

 

“Cause I'm just a girl I'd rather not be

'Cause they won't let me drive late at night

Oh I'm just a girl, guess I'm some kind of freak

'Cause they all sit and stare with their eyes”

(excerpt from“Just a girl”)

 

 

“Can you tell I'm faking it?

But I want to be myself

A counterfeit disposition

Can't be good for my health

So many different faces

Depending on the different phases”

(excerpt from “Magic’s in the makeup”) 

 

 

Notable Details:

-large clavicle and shoulder skeletal structure

-angular mandible and large male skull

-large trachea and visible adam’s apple

-devil horn’s hand symbols to give allegiance to her god

-straight torso with no female hips

-666 hand sign showing who she worships

-adonis belt visible in various images

 And more recently, seen here on the right in 2023:

MICROSOFT IS SPYWARE

As of 2024, over 95% of Microsoft users were using spyware crap 

These are some recent figures for Microsoft operating system usage - it blows me away that over 95% of Microsoft users are using Windows 10 or 11!

Microsoft ended for me at Win 7 (I refuse to use any newer Microsoft operating systems) and I'm mainly using Linux Mint now. Linux is far from perfect, and I suspect that the big players are doing their best to infiltrate Linux at every level and sabotage it's development from the inside. 

But with Windows 11, Microsoft has gone next level spyware, and I hope that more normies start to wake up this year. Windows 10 is spyware, but Windows 11 is deep state fist up sphincter data control. 2025 is a good time to wake up, it's only a decade too late...

 

LINUX NEEDS MORE FILE BROWSERS

Don't panic, I'm just kidding. Linux doesn't really need any more file browsers, it already has at least 32. What it needs are some more that are as good as the ones that come standard on Windows.

 This seems to be an issue that Linux developers have been refusing to address for decades. As a Windows user switching to Linux, I think it's one of the big issues that send so many Microsoft refugees straight back to Windows. Most Linux file browsers suck...

This is the process I went through looking for a good file browser when I was trying out some different Linux distros. Articles like this one proudly proclaim "there are 32 options for Linux file browsers" but I actually tried out about half of them (the others were mainly total geek stuff such as command line based ones, so clearly not what I was looking for), and there was only one I liked that did everything I wanted - NEMO (Which is the default file browser on both Linux Mint & Linux Zorin). 

 

 

There was actually only one other file browser I liked (Dolphin, the default file browser on KDE distros), but even that had an issue I would need to sort out before I could use it (it didn't display my PCloud drive), and I thought most of the others were completely hopeless. 

 

 

In fact there were less than half a dozen that I even thought were almost as good as the default file browser on Windows XP (Yes, XP from 2001!) but as with many things, this elephant in the Linux room seems to go unnoticed by most geeks.

 

The fact that it was Linux Mint that developed the Nemo file browser, thereby fixing the glaring hole that has made Linux all but unusable for non geeks for decades, was another aspect of what convinced me Mint is the best Linux distro.

 

 

I have over a 1/4 million files and the Nemo file browser is the main program that enabled me to switch to using Linux. Without a decent file browser I would be completely lost on Linux.

 

CENSORED BY GOOGLE

Because Blogger is owned by Google, I have long been expecting my posts to be censored, so I have them all backed up. But in all of 2024, only one of my posts was deleted. A post about Jason Christoff. 

 

Strangely my old blog seemed to develop more formatting bugs that started on the same day that post was censored. One of those problems is that no matter what I do in the advanced theme settings, I'm no longer able to change the colours of the links, which are stuck on unreadable dark blue and bright red. 

I can't help wondering if after a year of working well, Google wanted me to stop using their platform? It may just be a coincidence, or possibly the 15 year old theme is on it's last legs, but it seems odd...

The reposted version hasn't been censored yet, but just in case that new version still triggers Google's AI, I won't post it here on this new blog for now because I don't want to get off on the wrong foot. But you can still read it here. 

It's an interesting example of censorship, and ironically, in censoring that particular post, Google helped rekindle my interest in posting online. Why do they care so much? Which part of this information do these globalist data collecting scum fear the most?