DOES MONERO EVEN STILL WORK?

With all things relating to computer privacy we are in an awkward position that if something is widely used it won't be private, and if something is really private it will be prevented from becoming widely used. 

The crypto Monero is a good example - it was the only properly private cryptocurrency, but this year it has been made near to unusable - no exchanges will trade it, and no wallets will store it - it is still spoken of like it is the best privacy crypto, which it would be if it was usable, but it isn't.

I still have US$45 of Monero that I missed when I was selling my Monero at the start of the year. If I wanted to use it, that would not be easy, so I've written it off - It would require setting up an old wallet to even be able to see it, and any person I might send it to would need to do the same. 

No exchanges will accept Monero now so it can't easily be sold or traded. So the coin is essentially unusable, but nobody is talking about that, and it's still currently trading at US$400 seemingly unaffected by the fact that it's now a completely useless privacy coin. 

The fact that this coin is still supposedly happily trading like it's still usable and nobody is talking about this situation was the final straw that made me lose any remaining faith I had in cryptos. 

The elephant in the room is, who is trading it? and how are they trading it? If I can't trade my $45 of Monero, how are people trading millions of $ of it? Are all these trades of Monero even really happening? Why would anyone pay $400 for a privacy coin that is nearly unusable?

And that is why privacy is a really complex subject - nothing is what it seems! 

USE CASH

  I've been using cash as much as possible for the past 30 years, so it boggles my mind to see how many people are willingly lining up for digital slavery by using electronic payment systems as their main method of payment. 

 WAKE UP!!!!!

 The Threat of Financial Transaction Control by Catherine Austin Fitts

EXISTENTIAL CRISIS

It probably sounds a bit fruit-loops to even seriously be considering the optimum number of blog posts to do each day, but after doing a couple of posts mentioning my 27 year history of blogging, I started contemplating that life defining question again.

For most of the past 27 years I have simply done a blog post whenever I had an urge to say something, and over time on www.frot.co.nz, that generally worked out to an average of around 10 posts each month.

But with this new www.sift.co.nz blog, I set out at the start of 2024 with a definite aim of doing one post every day, even if those posts were only shorties. I liked the idea of forcing myself to post something daily, and wondered how I’d cope with that sort of intense pressure!

 

It has actually worked out fine, because on days when I couldn't be arsed writing much, I have just re-posted something from my old www.frot.co.nz blog, or shared a meme or something else fairly quick and basic. 

 

For the first year (2024) the hits on my new SIFT blog were fairly disappointing, generally numbering only around 100-200 total hits each day, and I thought my 1000+ hits a day times (2017-2019) were well and truly over. But throughout 2025 the hits have actually been slowly increasing, they are now averaging 500+ a day, and are continuing to gradually climb.

 

The only promotion I do these days are a few odd links on my Facebook account, apart from that I can't be bothered striving to get hits, but I must admit to having a look at the hit counter from time to time out of curiosity.

 

In the grand scheme of things I realise 1000 hits a day is bugger all, but it does add up to over a third of a million hits a year (365,000), and I used to manage to convince myself that I was a big-time influencer back in my 1000+ hits glory days.

 

If I'm honest about it, one way or another, I'd like to get back up over half a million hits a year. That was my peak hit-count on www.frot.co.nz back in 2018. Then I'd be a mover and shaker again. 

 

 

Presently the hits vary quite a bit each day, from lows of around 300, to highs of over 1500, and I have no idea why that is. Those quite big daily variations don't seem to be caused by my new posts of the day, there just seem to be inexplicable ebbs and flows in the overall traffic to the entire site.

In 27 years of blogging, the most posts I’ve ever done in one day is four (SIFT yesterday), and the longest I’ve gone without doing a post is 30 days (SIFT July 2025, but I've since filled that month back in). Clearly those are both maniacal and possibly unhealthy extremes which I'm not planning to attempt again.

My current plan, starting December 2025, is to continue aiming to do a post every day, but at the same time to randomly add any extra posts that I feel inclined to. So I might end up doing more than one post each day, or then again I might not, but either way I’m going to be taking an unconstrained walk on the wild side...

GLOBAL WARMING PAGE

 I have just added this old page from my www.frot.co.nz blog - It's a fairly long page, too big to be a post really, so this is only the intro

Bollocks On A Massive Scale - there are people all over the place who still to this day believe the global warming hoax hook line and sinker… Is there no cure for stupidity?

I originally compiled this page in 2015 and now a decade on, with all the geoengineering in full swing and the sheeple being primed for 15 min cities to “save the planet” it is clearly the next big psyop coming hot on the heels of the covidhoax.

Global warming has always looked to me like an apocalyptic religious cult. Although unimpressed with the “facts” used to justify the cult of global warming, I used to keep out of this discussion for three main reasons.

Firstly because disagreeing with global warming is like being seen as a “holocaust denier” – logic goes out the arse, people go into rabid attack dog mode, and what the hell, if they want to freak out about global warming, that’s their problem.

Secondly, one blog post can’t really cover this huge subject – for that I recommend going to a more in depth site

And thirdly, the last thing I want to look like is a defender of the American right to drive “SUV’s” – cutting down on pollution is a good thing, it just has bugger all to do with global warming.

When I originally researched this site, it was a bit of a shock to trawl through right wing US websites, reading articles by people who thought that Gore was wrong, so Bush must have been right. For the record I thought Bush (or at least the people who used to operate his strings) was evil too, but that doesn’t mean Gore wasn’t a lying con man.

So I’ll just attempt to keep this very simple, and maybe it will encourage someone somewhere to think this stuff through for themselves.

---

The Time Span is the Key

More than anything else, time is the key factor in understanding global warming. The earth doesn’t run on human time frames – like most planets it runs on much longer cycles. If we look at the past 2000 years, it’s true that the temperature is at the upper end of it’s range right now. But 2000 years is insignificant to a planet – the sort of time span we need to be looking at is half a million years

The patterns of warming and cooling become clearer the longer the time span we look at – in fact over 500,000 years the temperature chart looks almost like a heartbeat. Yes, it’s been hotter, and it’s been colder, and it’s managed to do both without any help from humans…

Over this time frame the key factor in temperature change appears to be variations in the shape of earth’s elliptical orbit – when we orbit closer to the sun the earth gets hotter.

Approximately every 100,000 years Earth’s climate warms up temporarily. These warm periods, called interglacial periods, appear to last approximately 15,000 to 20,000 years before regressing back to a cold ice age climate. At year 18,000 and counting our current interglacial vacation from the Ice Age is much nearer its end than its beginning.

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/ice_ages.html

 

See the rest here: https://sift666.blogspot.com/p/global-warming.html

SUMMER DELUSIONS

You wouldn't know it from looking at the internet, or from visiting flat earther forums, but half the planet celebrates Christmas at the height of summer, so all that stuff about snow, and sleds, and reindeer, is totally inappropriate.

Today is the first day of December (at least it is in New Zealand, the rest of you will probably get there quite soon), and I know I went on about the accelerating passage of time yesterday, but this alone is solid proof.

In less than a day it has become a different month. Some would argue that conclusion is completely retarded, but I had a quick look at my Facebook feed yesterday, and saw so many retarded posts about all sorts of deranged crap, that I started to wonder if many of my carefully selected 1500 intelligent and well informed Facebook friends have been replaced by AI.

I even had one claiming that "the moon landings" all took place as reported, and that I'm a delusional conspiracy theorist. WTF? I don't expect to see retarded drivel like that on my Facebook feed of all places. 

If they don't even grasp the most basic of all the past centuries psyops, who knows what other utterly moronic stories they might fall for hook line and sinker... 

 

 

There is even a popular story about a fictional "virus" called "COVID" (Certificate Of Vaccination ID). "Viruses" are all fictional but this particular one is even more impossible to actually prove the existence of than the others, and that is really saying something. 

 

I can be fairly easy going and open minded online (sometimes), but I do have limits. While I must admit that I generally turn a blind eye to "flat earthers" and "trump supporters" as long as they have other redeeming opinions, anyone who is "pro-vax" gets instant binning.

 

Just to make this totally clear, I am 100% opposed to all so called "vaccines" and I deliberately make a point of referring to them as death jabs. I don't think some of them are OK (or not as bad as the MRNA ones), I think they are all based on lies and designed for profit and eugenics purposes.

 

Anyone who promotes death jabs is engaging in mass murder. I just want to start the new month by making that clear, it's very unlikely, but I'd really hate to ever be accused of not stating my position.