There is a great deal of
controversy over the treatment of cancer using supplements containing
Vitamin B17 (laetrile). Most commonly this is taken in the form of
apricot kernels. Doctors, particularly in the US, say that apricot
kernels and other foods containing B17 are full of cyanide,
and will prove fatal if eaten. Meanwhile, there is a 40 year history of
the successful treatment of cancer using laetrile. These B17 containing
foods do contain substances called Cyanogenic Glycosides, but how
dangerous are they?
Looking
through the literally hundreds of personal stories posted on the
internet of people taking B17 and recovering from cancer, it is a common
thread that they all say their doctor told them apricot kernels were
toxic. And then couldn’t believe it when they got better.
For typical examples see – http://credence.org/testimon.html
Cyanogenic
Glycosides are also known as dietary cyanide, so it is technically true
that an apricot kernel or apple pips have “cyanide” in them. Or at
least they will produce a type of cyanide once ingested. But this is a
different form of cyanide to the industrial cyanides typically thought
of as cyanide (see an article on Cyanide Toxicity
). And despite having a billion dollar cancer industry to protect,
medical research showing actual cases of toxicity caused by eating
Cyanogenic Glycosides in foodstuffs are in fact thin on the ground.
While it’s a very widely espoused theory that people are dying like
flies from eating this stuff, there is a glaringly obvious lack of case
studies to back these claims up.
Cyanogenic
Glycosides occur in a surprising number of foods known for their
healing properties. These include flax seeds, apricot kernels, apple
pips, almonds, peach kernels, some types of beans, and in fact over 2500
plant species.
This is only one of a number of “alternative”cancer treatments that have shown good results. This article from DietNet covers a range of other non-toxic approaches to healing cancer.
On
the 14th of January 2016, the New Zealand government
rushed through legislation banning the sale of apricot kernels, under
the pretence of them being toxic. The real reason they did so was
to protect the cancer industry.
Where can I get apricot kernels?
As
long as you don’t live in a country where apricot kernels are repressed,
they are fairly easily obtained, as anywhere that grows apricots has
kernels. Up until 2016 that included Australia and New Zealand, but our
corrupt governments have now done everything they can to prevent this.
NZ grown kernels were on sale in shops up until 2016. But now,
apricot kernels are an underground black market item like cannabis oil,
which is also a cancer cure, and is also “illegal” because it poses a
threat to the cancer industry.
Dietary Cyanide is therapeutic
Foods containing “dietary
cyanides” may well be a valuable therapeutic tool, and the “cyanide” is
an essential part of the treatment value
Glycosides
are sugar derivatives. An overwhelming number of glycosides occur in
nature, mainly in plants. Recently these compounds have received much
attention because they possess a variety of biological activities and
have found importance in therapeutic, nutritional and clinical use.
Cyanide is not an
undesirable side effect. A high cyanogenic glycoside component releases
toxic hydrogen cyanide via auto-hydrolysis in the presence of water in
the gut.
Some researchers believe this is associated with an additional anti-cancer effect similar to that of the laetrile itself.
Some
other commonly consumed plants that contain dietary cyanides include:
almonds, tapioca, lima beans, flax seeds, and spinach.
Naturally Occurring Glycosides
The book “NATURALLY OCCURRING GLYCOSIDES was published in 1999 and it covers the positive uses of Cyanogenic Glycosides.
Naturally
Occurring Glycosides summarises significant contemporary information on
chemical, nutritional, biological and pharmacological aspects of
naturally occurring glycosides. Though mainly found in plants, there are
an overwhelming number of glycosides which occur in nature.
Currently
at the forefront of scientific investigation, these compounds have a
variety of uses including the treatment of congestive heart failure,
lowering cholesterol, flavourings, antibiotics and sweeteners.
Naturally
Occurring Glycosides presents 12 chapters dealing with chemical
structure, occurrence, biosynthetic and biological activity of the
following: Aminoglycosidic antibiotics; Anthocyanin glycosides; Cardiac
glycosides; Carotenoid glycosides; Cyanogenic glycosides;
Glycosinolates; Glycosidic bound volatiles in plants; Limonoid
glycosides; Saponins; Steroidal glycoalkaloids; Steroidal
oligosaccarides from marine sources; Terpenoid glycoside sweeteners.
By
reading Naturally Occurring Glycosides, researchers working in
chemistry, biochemistry, biology, toxicology, physiology and
pharmacology will gain a fascinating insight into the field of
glycosides.
Website – http://www.wiley.ca/cda/product/0,,047198602X,00.html
World Without Cancer
In 1974 G. Edward
Griffin wrote WORLD WITHOUT CANCER. This book explores the revolutionary
concept that cancer is a deficiency disease, like scurvy or pellagra,
aggravated by the lack of an essential food compound in modern man’s
diet. That substance is vitamin B17. But in its concentrated and
purified form developed specifically for cancer therapy, it is known as
Laetrile, the controversial chemical that currently is banned in the
United States.
The story
presented in this book does not carry the approval of orthodox medicine.
The Food and Drug Administration, The American Cancer Society, and The
American Medical Association have labeled it fraud and quackery. Yet the
evidence is overwhelming that here, at last, is the final answer to the
cancer riddle. Why has orthodox medicine waged war against this
non-drug approach?
The author
contends that the answer is strictly political and is based upon the
economic and power goals of those who control the medical establishment.
WORLD WITHOUT CANCER blazes the trail into previously unexplored
territory and reveals a shocking picture of how science has been
subverted to protect entrenched commercial and political interests. It
contains the kind of explosive impact that could topple an empire. And
perhaps it will.
The book is freely available for download here: https://archive.org/details/World_Without_Cancer
Check out the excellent reviews for this book on Amazon http://www.amazon.com/World-Without-Cancer-Story-Vitamin/dp/0912986190
A documentary by G. Edward Griffin is on Youtube along with a lot of other good info about B17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGsSEqsGLWM
Iowa State University
Iowa State
University on the other hand knows better… I have reprinted their
research in full, because it’s a valuable contribution to greater
understanding of the subject. It’s certainly hard to argue with their
reasoning:
“Amygdalin
or laetrile is a cyanide compound found in apricot kernels. It is a
phoney, ineffective cancer treatment that is illegal in the U.S. because
it is harmful and fraudulent”
This summary was originally
copied from the Iowa State University Extension website, but they have
since removed the page (possibly fearing that it made them look like
idiots)
The Right Dose
It is important to
get the right dose. Like many things apricot kernels are dangerous in
excess. The generally recommended dose is 1 kernel per 10lbs bodyweight,
per day, in split doses, eaten whole.
“The dose makes
the poison.” There’s hardly a more important toxic principle than that.
You can get a lot of things to show positive for mutagenicity if you’re
willing to load up on them.
Beyond that key point, Ames himself has made the argument that synthetic
compounds and naturally-occurring ones have the same hit rate in these
assays. Plants have evolved a variety of pesticides and antifeedant
compounds, many of which are reactive and toxic at some level –
therefore, most (as in 99.99%, according to his estimate) of the
pesticides in the human diet are those found in the plants themselves.
The cruciferous vegetables (broccoli, cabbage, mustard and so on) are
particularly rich in compounds that will light up an Ames test. A fine
article of his from 1990 states that “. . . it is probably true that
almost every plant product in the supermarket contains natural
carcinogens.”
The Ames Test And the Real World – http://dlowe.blogspot.com/2002_07_01_dlowe_archive.html
Another bogus example of poisoning
This quote originally came from another American university site – Cornell University New York.
They started out discussing examples of cyanogenic glycosides actually
killing people. Yet this is the worst example they had. Details were
vague – just how much did they eat? Raw cassava root is a potent source.
The webpage has since been taken down.
Although the media
is frequently reporting that people are having severe toxic reactions
to foods containing dietary cyanides, the reoccurring pattern is that
they provide no evidence.
Doctors are
constantly claiming that apricot kernels are a lethal toxin, yet a
typical example of a toxic reaction is an unsubstantiated allegation of a
malnourished African eating cassava roots. There are many thousands of
people eating cassava roots, but there seems to be a real shortage of
dead ones.
“Most events tend to occur at times of drought, hunger or simple inexperience.
Children in Venezuela became poisoned from eating Cassava
roots. The 8 children had consumed raw Cassava roots effectively
bypassing any of the standard detoxification steps. Some children fell
critically ill. Respiratory failure and circulatory collapse were the
serious consequences. However, the children did recover when quickly
treated”
In complete
contrast to the idea that Africans were poisoned by eating cassava,
there is a long and documented history of Africans living on cassava
diet having no cancer.
“In the
British Medical Journal of June 1923, was a letter from a British doctor
who had been practicing medicine in Nigeria for 23 years and found no
cancer among his patients. Following this letter there were several
letters of concurrence from other long serving doctors in Africa. Then
in 1931, Albert Schweizer, who had founded his hospital in Gabon in
1913, reported that he had found no cancer among the natives there.Their
staple diet was cassava and millet”
“Your Health at Risk” by Dr Toni Jeffreys (1998)
How many people have died from eating apricot kernals?
In the past 10
years, in NZ and Australia combined, there have been 137 adult and 32
child enquiries to poison centres, giving a rough average of 14 adult
and 3 child enquiries per year for the whole of Australasia.
Some of these were just general enquiries, and in many instances no symptoms were reported.
There were only
two instances where medical intervention was required. Although these
people were hospitalised, there was no report of death or long term
problems.
The most recent
Canadian poisoning incident occurred in May 2009, when a woman was
hospitalised following the consumption of approximately 40 apricot
kernels in a short period of time.
The FSANZ have
only managed to dig up four deaths globally from consumption of apricot
Kernels, and these appear to be the only confirmed deaths in the last 57
years. Sayre and Kaymakcalavu (1964) report that between 1957 and 1962,
two children died of cyanide poisoning in a hospital in Central Turkey
after eating apricot kernels. No information was provided on how many
kernels were consumed.
Lasch and Shawa
(1981) report two more deaths of children in Gaza. Once again, there was
no information on how much was consumed. Compare these comparatively
small numbers with the numbers of deaths and illnesses from other causes
such as food poisoning from widely purchased foods.
Or compare it with
the literally millions of deaths from prescribed pharmaceutical drugs
over the same time period. It is clear from the numbers above that we
are talking about an extremely minor risk that does not need to be
outlawed. It is nowhere near the “unacceptable acute risk to public
health and safety for consumers due to HCN poisoning” that the FSANZ are
claiming
Laetrile has a specific cancer preventive and controlling effect
Laetrile is an
amygdalin, a simple chemical compound consisting of two molecules of
sugar, one molecule of benzaldehyde,and one molecule of cyanide.
Nitrilosides are known as “laetrile” when used in medical dosage form.
Laetrile is a
natural substance made from apricot pits and is claimed by its
developers to have a specific cancer preventive and controlling effect.
Dr. Ernest Krebs, Sr., who was the first to use laetrile therapeutically
in this country, considered laetrile to be an essential vitamin and
named it B17.
Laetrile has been
legalized in several states in the United States; however, many doctors
in the medical community reject its use in human cancer patients on the
grounds that it is ineffective and may be poisonous because of its
cyanide content. This view is not held by Dr. Dean Burk, chief
cytologist of the National Cancer Institute, who has conducted extensive
tests including the use of laetrile and states that “Laetrile is
remarkably non-toxic … compared with virtually all cancer
chemotherapeutic agents currently studied.” (“Laetrile – An Answer to Cancer?” Prevention, December 1971, p. 162.) Other scientists claim that cyanide occurring naturally in food is not dangerous.
Laetrile is
manufactured and used legally in over 17 countries throughout the world,
including Mexico, Germany, Italy, Belgium, and the Philippines.
Natural cyanide is
locked in a sugar molecule. It is normally found in over 2,000 known
unrefined foods and grasses. A concentration of about 2 or 3 percent
laetrile is found in the whole kernels of most fruits, including
apricots, apples, cherries, peaches, plums, and nectarines, and in some
70 plants commonly fed to animals for fodder. A sprouting seed produces
from 10 to 30 times as much laetrile as does the mature plant. Few
citrus fruits contain laetrile. Shelled and unshelled apricot kernels
contain 2 to 3 percent amygdalin and are also excellent sources of
protein, unsaturated fatty acids, and minerals.
According to its
advocates, laetrile is a highly selective substance that attacks only
the cancerous cells. When laetrile is eaten and absorbed by normal
cells, an enzyme called rhodanese detoxifies the cyanide, which is then
excreted through the urine. But because cancer cells are completely
deficient in rhodanese and are instead surrounded by another enzyme,
beta-glucosidase, which releases the bound cyanide from the laetrile at
the site of malignancy, laetrile is believed to attack only the
malignant areas.
Absorption and Storage
Oral doses of
laetrile are not affected by the action of the acid medium of the
stomach but pass directly into the intestine, where the substance is
acted upon by bacterial enzymes. The bacterial enzymes in the intestine
decompose the amygdalin into four components, which are then absorbed
into the lymph and portal systems and circulated throughout the body.
A Loyola University biologist has
conducted laboratory tests on mice indicating that laetrile in
conjunction with various vitamins and enzymes is more effective in
causing a remission of cancer than laetrile administered alone. (Los Angeles Times, Sept. 7, 1977.)
Dosage and Toxicity
Although much
research on laetrile is still needed, the usual dosage is 0.25 to 1.0
gram taken with meals. Cumulative amounts of more than 3.0 grams are
sometimes taken, but more than 1.0 gram is never taken at any one time.
Dosages as high as 20 grams daily of combined oral and intravenous
administration have been used on patients whose detoxification and
elimination levels of laetrile were adequate.
Five to thirty
apricot kernels eaten through the day may be a sufficient preventive
amount, but they should never be taken all at one time. It is not
considered desirable to prepare a slurry of ground up kernels (as in a
solution of water, milk, or orange juice) and then let it stand for long
periods of time before consumption.
Toxicity levels have not been established, and one should exercise
extreme caution in order to avoid ingesting excessive amounts all at one
time.
Deficiency Effects and Symptoms
Prolonged deficiency may lead to diminished resistance to malignancies.
Beneficial Effect on Ailments
Amygdalin may
reduce the size of cancer tumors, ease accompanying pain, and inhibit
the growth of cancer cells. In addition, it favorably regulates blood
pressure and may have an anti-rheumatic and esthesizing effect.
Cancer cells were dying like flies
In his UK Observer
article entitled Quacks on the Rack, John Diamond (a strongly anti
“alternative” treatment English journalist who died of cancer) summarily
dismissed what is arguably the most famous of the natural and proven
anti-cancer treatments known to man, the natural extract of the apricot
kernel, otherwise known as Vitamin B17.
“Supporters of
Laetrile (vitamin B17) and Essiac, in particular, made so much noise
about their miracle cures that both have been through the research mill
on numerous occasions and found to be useless.”
Interestingly, Dr.
Dean Burk, the former head of the Cytochemistry Department of the
National Cancer Institute, and one of the co-founders of this famous
American medical institution, had worked on Vitamin B17 personally. He
described this substance in very different terms: “When we add laetrile
to a cancer culture under the microscope,” said Burk, “providing the
enzyme glucosidase also is present, we can see the cancer cells dying
off like flies.” (glucosidase being the enzyme heavily present in
cancerous cells which triggers the unique cancer-destroying mechanism
found in Vitamin B17.
An excellent
clinical analysis of this mechanism is found in ‘B17 Metabolic Therapy –
In The Prevention And Control Of Cancer – a concise history of the
research into this vitamin, including many clinical assessments. Dr Burk
also stated that evidence for Laetrile’s efficacy had been noted in at
least five independent institutions in three widely separated countries
of the world.
So who do we trust
in this matter? Diamond or Burk? Now we can ask ourselves whether it
was perhaps the fault of some kindly but misguided soul who posted John
Diamond an essay on the benefits of Vitamin B17 mixed with walnut water
that caused him to dismiss B17 so emphatically. Or it could be that John
actually trusted the conventional research reports he had accrued on
this vitamin. By examining the sources from where John Diamond might
have got his B17 research ‘information’, the ugly features of
conventional cancer research move more sharply into focus.
Because of the money
Cancer is big
business and knowledge claims on any treatments that earn money and,
conversely, on any treatments that do not earn money for the drug
companies, are never neutral. Dr Ralph Moss
served as the Assistant Director of Public Affairs at America’s most
famous cancer research institution, Memorial Sloan Kettering, in
Manhattan. He knows the cancer industry inside out. Hear what he has to
say and judge for yourself the quality of the evidence against the
effectiveness of Vitamin B17: Moss: “Shortly after I went to work [at
the Sloan Kettering Cancer Institute], I visited the elderly Japanese
scientist, Kanematsu Sugiura, who astonished me when he told me he was
working on Laetrile (B17)”
At the time it was
the most controversial thing in cancer, reputed to be a cure for
cancer. “We in Public Affairs were giving out statements that laetrile
was worthless, it was quackery, and that people should not abandon
proven therapies. I was astonished that our most distinguished scientist
would be bothering with something like this, and I said, Why are you
doing this if it doesn’t work? – He took down his lab books and showed
me that in fact Laetrile was dramatically effective in stopping the
spread of cancer. We were finding this and yet we in Public Affairs were
told to issue statements to the exact opposite of what we were finding
scientifically.”
Unable to sit on
this information, Moss later called a press conference of his own and,
before a battery of reporters and cameramen, charged that
Sloan-Kettering officials had engineered a massive cover-up. He provided
all the supporting documents and named all the names necessary to
validate his case. The following day he was fired for ‘failing to carry
out his most basic job responsibilities’.
Similarly, in his
book ‘World Without Cancer’, cancer industry researcher Edward Griffin
noted : “Every Laetrile study had been tarnished with the same kind of
scientific ineptitude, bias and outright deception… Some of these
studies openly admitted evidence of anti-cancer effect but hastened to
attribute this effect to other causes. Some were toxicity studies only,
which means that they weren’t trying to see if Laetrile was effective,
but merely to determine how much of it was required to kill the
patient.” The ‘evidence’ supporting John Diamond’s claim that Vitamin
B17 is useless and even dangerous is available in abundance in all of
the major cancer institutions today. Well of course it is! We’re in the
merchant’s house, don’t forget.
As Pat Rattigan,
author of ‘The Cancer Business’ reports: “The threat to the cancer
business from effective therapies was taken very seriously from the
beginning. By the 1940’s the Syndicate had 300,000 names on its ‘quack’
files. Vitamin B17, being a unique threat due to its simplicity,
attracted more concentrated attacks than all the other treatments put
together: fraudulent test reports; hired, banner-carrying pickets
outside clinics; rigged juries; newspaper character assassinations;
dismissal of heretic employees, etc. The FDA, orchestrating the
onslaught, sent out 10,000 posters and hundreds of thousands of leaflets
warning about the dangers of the toxicity of the non-toxic substance.
Earlier, a Congressional Accounting Office had found that 350 FDA
employees had shares in, or had refused to declare an interest in, the
pharmaceutical industry.”
The American Food
and Drug Administration issued one such story about the death of an
eleven month old girl, supposedly from cyanide poisoning due to her
apparently swallowing her father’s Vitamin B17 tablets. Cancer
specialist and B17 advocate Dr Harold Manner takes up the story: ‘…I was
lecturing in Buffalo, New York and…after I had made some strong
statements – a man stood up and said “Dr. Manner, how in the world can
you make statements like that when the FDA is making these other
statements?” I reiterated that the FDA statements were lies. ‘He said,
“Look at this little girl in upstate New York, she took her father’s
Laetrile tablets and died of cyanide poisoning.” Just then a little lady
stood up: “Dr. Manner let me answer that question. I think I am
entitled to because I am that little baby’s mother. That baby never
touched her father’s Laetrile tablets. The doctor, knowing the father
was on Laetrile, marked down “possible cyanide poisoning”. At the
hospital they used a cyanide antidote and it was the antidote that
killed the child. And yet that statement will continue to appear even
though they know it is a lie.”
The scare stories
always focus on the minute amounts of naturally occurring cyanide found
in VitaminB17. But no mention is made in any of these stories of the
wondrous mechanism governing the release of this cyanide. No harm is
done to the person eating this vitamin (if that were the case, we have
consumed enough apricots, apples, peaches and cherries etc containing
B17 to have finished us off long ago.) The cyanide is released only when
cancerous cells are recognised by their high glucosidase content. B17
cyanide attacks cancer cells specifically. No large amounts of
glucosidase detected means no cyanide release. Rest assured, there is no
evidence that vitamin B17 can kill, unless of course, one is
accidentally crushed under a pallet of the stuff!
A further
embarrassment for the cancer orthodoxy must surely be the research being
carried out at the Imperial College in London, where researchers are
looking at ways of using naturally-occurring plant cyanide to
specifically attack human bowel tumours. The idea came about after
studying the pattern of specific cyanide release in the almond and
cassava fruit which protects them from insect attack. Another one of
those natural wonders just crying out to be heard is at last being
listened to by the orthodoxy perhaps? Very sadly, in assessing the
deservedness of the ‘shady’ reputation bestowed upon Vitamin B17
metabolic therapy, we realise it is entirely unwarranted and that
instead, there has been a sustained attack by the conventional cancer
industry on this treatment, an attack that has carried on in one form or
another for the last forty years.
As mentioned
earlier, with global spending on conventional cancer running into the
hundreds of billions annually, a naturally-occurring cancer cure of any
description is an unwanted intruder. Dr Moss again, on the money
involved in conventional cancer: Moss: “About 630,000 people die every
year of cancer in the US, and it really is an epidemic disease. We have
got a tremendous industry. Every one of those people who is getting
cancer and dying of it is going to be treated, and these treatments are
extremely expensive. Chemo is tens of thousands, sometimes hundreds of
thousands of dollars. A bone marrow transplant, which is basically
another way of giving chemotherapy, or radiation, can run to about
$150,000 per person, and is almost never effective. It kills about 25%
of the patients.” Lee: “Why carry on doing it?” Moss: “Because of the
money, which is tremendous.” When we understand the amounts of money
involved, we can begin to understand the in-house desire to sustain a
‘fact-creating’ process in support of conventional treatment.
Conventional cancer treatment and research is a licence to print money.
Most definitely,
conventional interested parties and institutions have colluded in a
shameful anti-Vitamin B17 ‘fact-creating’ process, which in turn has
surely led to the early and even unnecessary deaths of thousands upon
thousands of people. As for John Diamond’s dismissal of Vitamin B17, he
didn’t write his comments on B17 as an intentional slur. He wasn’t the
forked tongue in this chain of events. He desperately wanted to live.
His single paragraph read by thousands was just another example of the
damaging knock-on effect of merchant-speak. Merchant-speak on Vitamin
B17 metabolic therapy has exacted a grave injustice upon this treatment
and subsequently, upon all who have been persuaded to think likewise. It
is interesting to note that there are cultures today who remain almost
entirely cancer-free.
The Abkhasians,
the Azerbaijanis, the Hunzas, the Eskimaux and the Karakorum all live on
foodstuffs rich in nitriloside or vitamin B17. Their food consists
variously of buckwheat, peas, broad beans, lucerne, turnips, lettuce,
sprouting pulse or gram, apricots with their seeds and berries of
various kinds. Their diet can provide them with as much as 250-3,000mg
of nitriloside a day.
The founding
father of Vitamin B17 research, Ernst T Krebs Jr., studied the dietary
habits of these tribes. Krebs stated: “Upon investigating the diet of
these people, we found that the seed of the apricot was prized as a
delicacy and that every part of the apricot was utilized.” The average
western diet with its refined, fibreless foods offers less than 2mg of
nitriloside a day. It has also been noted that natives from these
tribes, who move into ‘civilised’ areas and change their diets
accordingly, are prone to cancers at the regular western incidence. An
important point to note with B17 content in the apricot fruit is that
the more bitter the taste of the apricot kernal, the richer is the
content of B17. If the kernel does not taste bitter, the B17 content
will be quite low.
L I N K S
http://www.whale.to/m/binzel.html –
ALIVE AND WELL – One Doctor’s Experience with Nutrition in the
Treatment of Cancer Patients – a book by Philip E. Binzel, Jr., M.D.
http://www.amazon.com/World-Without-Cancer-Story-Vitamin/dp/0912986190 – World Without Cancer book on Amazon (includes many excellent reviews for this book)
https://archive.org/details/World_Without_Cancer – Free download of World Without Cancer ebook
http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/vitamin-b-17-laetrile.htm – Excellent summary of B17
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/08/03/natural-cancer-treatment.aspx – Why Medicine Won’t Allow Cancer to Be Cured
http://www.naturalnews.com/027088_cancer_laetrile_cure.html – Apricot Seeds Kill Cancer Cells without Side Effects
http://www.naturalnews.com/044850_Laetrile_cancer_hospital_cover-up.html – Laetrile cover-up exposed at major cancer hospital
http://pipeline.corante.com/– Blog about drugs and the pharma industry
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/cancer_business.htm – The Cancer Business
http://together.net/~cauldron/vitamin%20B17.html – article by Ernest Krebs
http://users.navi.net/~rsc/nitrilo1.htm – The Nitrolosides in plants and animals
http://www.vitaminb17.org/ – Summary of “World Without Cancer – the B17 story”
http://www.whale.to/a/ransom.html – Death by Doctoring
http://worldwithoutcancer.org.uk/studies-research-more-documented-evidence/amygdalin-laetrile-b-17/ – documented research on B17 therapy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF84nu9wEvc – Burzynski – Cancer Big Business
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGsSEqsGLWM – About B17 – a documentary by G. Edward Griffin on Youtube
https://www.frot.co.nz/design/health/apricot-kernels/
Here are some more of my pics in no particular order:
.png)
