Transitioning from normie to conspiracy theorist
When asked what started me off down the conspiracy rabbit hole I struggle to know where to begin. Like most people who were aware that most of what we are being told is a giant work of fiction well before the covidhoax, it wasn't one specific event, but a gradual series of penny dropping moments that took me to the point I'm at now of believing that pretty much everything in both the mainstream and it's supposed antithesis, the truther movement, is at least half fake.
Even that may be overlooking the fact that to some extent I seem to have always been a a bit of conspiracy theorist and was possibly born that way. I certainly had issues with school and authority figures from a very young age, and was fairly up to speed with vaccines being a scam by the time I was 14 and refused to have one. Unfortunately I had already received about five jabs in total up until the age of 10 that I wish I could also have avoided.
It's a mystery to me why some people are so resistant to learning that everything they have been told is a lie. I'm drawn to finding out that sort of stuff like a duck to water, and while my initial reaction to anything new tends to be skeptical, I can usually be found online trying to to dig up more information about it within hours.
In the 90's I was co-owner of a cycle shop, which was the perfect business for an ex cycle courier and bike mechanic who was obsessed with bike racing. My first trip into a rabbit hole was finding out just how much drug use there was in cycle racing.
I only tried using ephedrine once and felt superhuman for a few hours before having a physical meltdown and feeling ill for weeks. It certainly wasn't for me, but I learned a couple of things from that experiment.
My next step down the rabbit hole was getting an internet connection and a decent computer in 1997. But by then I was completely burned out from all the cycling and overworking I'd done and by 1998 I was having increasingly frequent headaches and dizzy spells, as well as being constantly exhausted.
So I ended up spending more and more time on the computer researching things on the internet. Although that was over 25 years ago, back then there was already a lot of really interesting stuff online and in some ways the underground information was easier to find then than it is now.
There is even a theory that the entire internet is being gradually replaced by AI and while I wouldn't go as far as to say that process is complete just yet, certainly a look at the hits or the comments on YouTube, or the history of traffic on my old www.frot.co.nz blog, indicates that since around 2016 the entire internet has become increasingly fake.
These days a lot of good underground information does still remain, and some of the old sites I was reading in the 90's are still online, with some even looking exactly the same. Whale is a good example. But while it's hard to remove information from the internet, it's easy to bury it, especially using AI, and now a lot of the most revealing information has been buried under 20 years of globalist misinformation.
Oddly the other thing that really caught my attention back then was reading an article in 1999 about the Oklahoma bombing which had taken place in 1995. That was the first time I'd seen a false flag event exposed, and the penny really dropped. It was like a scene from "They Live" and from that point on I had a pair of the special sunglasses.
And that's what I mean about things coming together - when the Oklahoma bombing had taken place just four years earlier I had accepted the official story like nearly everyone else. In 1995 I was a "normie", but by 1999 I was a "conspiracy theorist". And it was learning about that particular deep state false flag that enabled me to later see the 911 false flag for what it was within a day of it happening.
The follow up Matrix movies seemed to try and undermine many of the insights from the original movie, and the Wachowski "brothers" later both transitioned and also went on to reveal many of their their true colours with the deviant TV series Sense8.
But to me all of this stuff was only like watching a movie and it didn't really get personal until 2002. At that point I finally had an MRI scan done and found why I had headaches and was going deaf in one ear, starting to lose the sight in one eye, and had no balance at all if I closed my eyes. It turned out I had a 3.4cm benign brain tumour.
After seeing the scans, the specialist doctors then told me if I didn't have brain surgery immediately I'd be dead within six months. But it all worked out for the best really because by that stage I not only had no faith in the medical system, I had come to actively mistrust it, so I told those doctors where to stick their treatment options without hesitation, which probably saved my life.
It also led to learning more about natural therapies and supplements, and when many of these things were hard to obtain in New Zealand, to setting up a supplement business called Nature Foods, and also starting a local WAPF chapter.
Two years after finding out I had a brain tumour I met a woman who had been diagnosed with a very similar tumour around the same time as me. She did what she was told and had the surgery, and to be honest she was so messed up from the surgery that I was horrified. At what point would you rather be dead than another medical victim in the clutches of the sickness industry?
They always use fear as a psychological weapon, as they later did with the covid hoax, and when you are at your weakest they circle like vultures. That realisation around 20 years ago was probably the point when I first understood that I was totally into the rabbit hole. Show no fear and the vultures will back off.
Some people certainly think he was, but I used to have a soft spot for his wonky looking art so was blinded to all this… This review on the other hand is no holds bared scathing about him:
“He was such a super asshole. It’s all about attitude – I guess if you just look at the art and don’t know anything about him then the art, in and of itself, could be considered beautiful – but then you find out about him, and it’s hard to still like his art – because then I can see the taunting fuck you message he is sending off – if he had had an attitude of care about the images instead of being a total vampire – he basically sucked the life out of things and then spat them back out as a Polaroid.
He funded a lot of very sick people getting hooked on dope for 15 min of fame in the factory – he fed on weak people’s weaknesses – he did not uplift them – but instead he added more sickness to sickness – and surely he didn’t know any better – but Andy Warhol is like the iconic human version of what Facebook is now – YUCK. He had no aspirations to uplift or grow or be better, instead he reveled in sickness and made more of it…
Yes, the art has a certain beauty but the multiple nature of it is what makes me cringe… I was taught in art school to see beauty in everything including common artifacts of society- like a toaster or a watering can or a fork knife spoon – even a Campbell’s soup can- but he took it that one step further and debased the image- and the did the same with humans-
What did he contribute to society? It’s like Madonna-who took the last vestiges of goodness and sexed it up- laying the groundwork for all that we have now… they both took the dregs and made them into fake diamonds…I just detest Andy Warhol so much that it’s impossible for me to really enjoy his work…”
I both agree and disagree at the same time which is optimal
Basically I think most popular culture is manipulated to some extent by agencies like the Tavistock institute or programs like MK Ultra.
But having said that, most of my favourite music, movies, and art, are part of that social programming. So I can’t dismiss it all because the intentions behind it may have been bad, because it’s my inspiration. I think the internet was set up by the Ddep state for evil intent but I use it every day..
Andy Warhol seems to me to have been a very original thinker with some fairly severe personality disorders.
I think he was an “Asset” (a creator manipulated and used by agencies) rather than another talentless puppet put in place by the agencies and lifted to popularity (like all modern pop stars) or a shill (like Alex Jones)
So I see his art as being original and it resonates with me – sometimes I do a picture and only afterwards realise his influence – like this one: