BEATING AROUND THE BUSHES

Why do so many people constantly beat around the bush, or sitting on both side of the fence, too afraid to say what they actually think?  

 I've really had enough of seeing a bunch of spineless twats desperately trying not to cause offense, in the hope of gaining some sort of reward for being popular. 

They call themselves "influencers" because they have masses of imaginary AI "followers".  Except that in reality they don't, because an AI follower is no more a real follower than a man in a dress is a real woman.

When you get down to it an AI follower is just as fucked up as a man in a dress. They are both just delusional fantasies. 

I've done a page summarising a bunch of things that most normies seem to believe - it's called "CONSPIRACY 101" and it includes all sorts of psyops from 911 to "vaccines" 

 

But right now there are some new things that a lot of people are beating around bushes on. Here are three that are very current right now:

1.AI  

AI is complete bullshit. It's not "a bubble", it's an all out scam. Right now, companies like Microslop (Windows 11) and Apple (Now paying billions to Google to rent a second rate version of their AI) are totally losing the plot. 

I wouldn't invest a cent in any company that was chasing an AI delusion. I fully expect the AI crash to make the EV crash look like a seniors beginner Yoga lesson.

2. MICROSLOP

Windows 11 is like a trillion dollar Linux marketing campaign. They may have gotten away with selling a lot of really shit sloperating systems over the past 30 years, but I fully expect Win 11 to take Microslop down. 

Their credit has run out, and even if they released Windows 12 next month and it was reasonably good, I think the damage is done now. Once people leave Microslop they never go back. 

3. FICTIONAL "GLOBAL WARMING" 

This is clearly the next big psyop planned to follow on the heels of the covidhoax. 

Greentards and normies will fall for it hook line and sinker, as they always do. But all the chemtrails and geoengineering in the world can't hide the fact the the earth is cooling, glaciers and areas of ice are growing, and sea levels are dropping.

https://www.climatedepot.com

 

CHARLES DARWIN WAS A FICTIONAL CHARACTER

 The Charles Darwin scam is really entertaining - I was up to speed with him having plagiarized all his works, but didn't realise his entire trip was a work of fiction. The same pattern repeats yet again - all our history is fictional.

 

  Now don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting that Miles Mathis is a trusted source or anything. In fact I suspect he's a Tavistock shill, but what these five essays do show very clearly, is that Charles Darwin was a wealthy aristocratic con man who plagiarized all his research and never even went on any expeditions.

 
http://mileswmathis.com/darwin.pdf

 
http://mileswmathis.com/darw2.pdf

 
http://mileswmathis.com/wallace.pdf

 
http://mileswmathis.com/huxley.pdf

 

 http://mileswmathis.com/darw5.pdf

 

MY PHILOSOPHY

 What to do with submission muzzles and death jabs.

This was always my philosophy during the covid hoax - so many people who wore the muzzles and got the jabs seem to be chronically ill now, with weak immune systems, and every day I hear of more jabbed up people with "covid" (whatever that bullshit really is...)

RANDOMS 2026 #4

 More random images!

 

DIGITAL PRIVACY PAGE

I've decided to start a new page about digital privacy, because we are now under serious attack and need to find ways to defend ourselves. Here is the first post:

 https://sift666.blogspot.com/p/digital-privacy.html
 

Digital ID's have been a threat on the horizon for years, but recently they have gone from just being a threat to being an actual hard out attack on our freedoms. 

As with the death jabs during the covid hoax, where I said right from the outset, "I will never submit to any death jabs", I will also never submit to any form of digital ID, but clearly that is rapidly going to cause issues, as "they" ramp up the pressure to submit.

Submission is not an option, so we need work arounds. 

 

 

WAYS TO HAVE SOME DIGITAL PRIVACY

 

The subject of digital privacy is huge but we have to start somewhere, even if we have no idea where this is going to lead, or even where is the best place to start.

 

 

1. AVOID USING CELL PHONES 

 

Back in the 90's, cell phones were the hot new fashion, and my friends all got them, so I got one too, but I can honestly say I never liked them, and I refused right from the outset to pay for any sort of monthly account.

 

I've stuck to using pre-pay only for nearly 30 years now, and most years I forget to even do a $10 top up, so my balance gets wiped nearly every year. I very seldom make any calls, and never use data, so I generally spend less than $20 on pre-pay per year.

 

In this day and age, I may well be one of the most clueless people in the world when it comes to cell phones, and for me of all people to start off here talking about phones is completely fruit-loops.

 

But if I had to start with one practical suggestion for achieving some degree of digital privacy, it would be to avoid using cell phones as much as possible.

 

I do have a Samsung phone running Android, not because I think it has any degree of privacy at all, but because I had nearly a full decade of reliability out of my first one, so got another one when it finally met with nasty accident (admittedly I seldom use them). 

 

So I'm not saying to not have a phone at all, because from time to time there is no easy work around, and occasionally a phone is fairly essential. But I am recommending to avoid using phones as much as possible.

 

Eventually I will need to replace my Samsung phone, and then I will look at privacy options like a Brax phone, or some sort of Linux phone if there is a suitable option for me by then, but in the meantime I'll keep on not using my Samsung phone for as long as it still runs.

 

When it comes to phones I'm clueless because I've always done my upmost to avoid using them, but I'm putting them here in first place because I think they are arguably the technology that presents the biggest danger to our privacy and freedom.

 

 

DEL BIGSHILL

 Del Bigtree is just another gatekeeper shill. One of many. 

Unless they came out at least five years ago and publicly said GERM THEORY IS BULLSHIT, VIRUSES ARE FICTIONAL, and ALL "VACCINES" ARE DESIGNED TO KILL, they are are controlled gatekeepers spinning bullshit for their globalist masters...
 

THERE IS NO DOUBT GWEN STEFANI LOOKS DODGY

Gwen Stefani is an American singer and songwriter who came to fame in the 1990s as the lead singer for the band No Doubt before starting a solo career.

 

Was she a MTF invert deceiving the masses and in particular young women, promoting body image and identity issues? Stefani sometimes seemed sad and tortured in her lyrics, which possibly alluded to her struggles with being an invert in disguise.

This is a hard call, and I've long sat on the fence about this. She was no Taylor Swift (an obvious MTF) but something certainly does not look right here.
 

 

When "I'm Just a Girl" came out in 1995 I thought it was great, but the messages in this video went totally over my head. Watching it now, the lyrics, Gwen Stafani's mannish looks, and all those images of urinals and public toilets, are not lost on me! Still a great song though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHzOOQfhPFg

 

“Cause I'm just a girl I'd rather not be

'Cause they won't let me drive late at night

Oh I'm just a girl, guess I'm some kind of freak

'Cause they all sit and stare with their eyes”

(excerpt from“Just a girl”)

 

 

“Can you tell I'm faking it?

But I want to be myself

A counterfeit disposition

Can't be good for my health

So many different faces

Depending on the different phases”

(excerpt from “Magic’s in the makeup”) 

 

 

Notable Details:

-large clavicle and shoulder skeletal structure

-angular mandible and large male skull

-large trachea and visible adam’s apple

-devil horn’s hand symbols to give allegiance to her god

-straight torso with no female hips

-666 hand sign showing who she worships

-adonis belt visible in various images

 And more recently, seen here on the right in 2023:

MICROSLOP IN FULL BACKLASH MODE

There has been a big backlash from health care providers about Microsoft's data collection using Windows 11. Australian hospitals have just realised they are at risk of being sued for breaking patient confidentiality as Microsoft is harvesting all their patient records. 

 

So this week they have decided to move their computers from Windows to Linux, and about 100,000 Australian hospital PC's are just about to move off Microsoft, with more to follow. (These are approximate figures that I haven't checked)

Meanwhile in Korea companies like Samsung have apparently finally realised that Microsoft is potentially doing industrial espionage on them (what on earth did they think Microsoft were doing all along?) so Korea is now switching hundreds of thousands of computers to Linux.

Microsoft's share price has recently had around a 10% drop which has wiped billions off their valuation.

 

IT'S ALL FAKE

 I hope everyone realises none of this is actually real! 🥹 We are all being played...

If information is being presented to us, it is probably fake. Why would "they" tell us anything true? 

What does that include? EVERYTHING: Gender, Hollywood, social media, "news", politics, media, alternative media, history, medicine, education, religion, the internet, economics, AI, cryptos, money, technology, pretty much everything!
 

HITS ARE STRANGE

I know I keep going on about this, but hits these days are really strange...

On this blog the hit count for most of 2024 was only about 100 - 200 a day.

Then in 2025 it started climbing and by the end of the year it was up to about 1000 a day.

And here at the beginning of 2026 it took off like an imaginary moon rocket and was racking up over 2000 hits a day, sometimes over 3000. Holy cow, I'm an influencer again my ego screamed triumphantly!
 

Something I've noticed before is that when I do less posts I get more hits, and when I do more posts the hits drop. Odd...

It doesn't really matter, I only post this stuff for my own entertainment, I'm not trying to "monetize" anything, or even to expose any deep state agendas, because I've tried that already and it wasn't very effective.

This week my hits have suddenly dropped back again from over 2000 a day to less than 100. And a little voice in my head is asking "Is this proof that all my hits were either being made up by Google altogether, or are a result of AI bots crawling the web using algorithms?"

 

If the hits on this blog were a result of actual people visiting my blog, it's unlikely the hit-count would shoot up and down like that, as it's not like thousands of people are using Google to search for "strange little purple blogs posting all sorts of deranged crap".

If they were, Google could blacklist my blog and the hits would stop. That could certainly be done, but what were those 2000+ hits I was getting each day up until last week? If they were regular readers, or the result of traffic from links posted on other websites, then a Google blacklisting wouldn't affect them.

So I suspect that my 2000 hits a day were almost entirely imaginary, and what AI gives, AI can take away. Being a bit old school I sometimes struggle with this level of fakeness, but I need to remind myself of the following:

I write blog posts if and when I feel like, with no expectation of them making any difference to anything, or even being read by anyone.