Another
great new podcast from Mr E on Odysee - this one has a quick look at
some of the guys who competed as women at the Paris Olympics - it's
titled "Are There Any Women in Women's Sports?"
Wednesday 21 August 2024
Are There Any Women in Women's Sports?
Tuesday 20 August 2024
Bikini Atoll is a hot tourist destination
Bikini Atoll is now a popular tourist destination, but clueless "scientists" are pretending to be baffled as to why marine life is thriving there...
The realisation that "nuclear bombs" are entirely fictional is not an area they want to get into.
The photos of the "nuclear testing" are all spectacularly fake. And there were supposedly 23 bombs tested, LOL, why is it always 23?.
Scientists report corals as big as cars and say it is teeming with fish such as snapper, sharks and tuna.
Steve Palumbi, professor of marine sciences at Stanford University and his team have been studying the effects of radiation poisoning on marine life. He declared the flora and fauna “remarkably resilient” at the Micronesian island, located halfway between Hawaii and Australia.
The scientist reports plentiful schools of fish inhabiting the lagoon, using the living coral as a place to spawn. Profesor Palumbi says fish populations are thriving because they have been left alone - “in a strange way they are protected by the history of this place”.
The
abundant coral seem unharmed by high radiation levels. A research team
is investigating how the coral colonies are able to survive – and even
thrive - by sequencing their DNA as well as calculating mutation rates
and patterns.
Things to do on Bikini Atoll
Bikini Atoll, Namu Marshall Islands is a breathtakingly beautiful
destination with a rich cultural history and plenty of activities for
visitors to enjoy. Located in the westernmost part of the Marshall
Islands, Bikini Atoll is known for its stunning turquoise waters, lush
green vegetation, and diverse marine life. Whether you’re looking for a
relaxing beach holiday, an exciting adventure, or a chance to explore
the area’s unique culture, Bikini Atoll has something for everyone. Here
are 10 things to do in Bikini Atoll, Namu Marshall Islands.
1.
Dive or Snorkel in the Lagoon: Bikini Atoll has a stunning lagoon that
is perfect for diving and snorkeling. The lagoon is filled with vibrant
and colorful coral, as well as a wide variety of tropical fish. You can
also explore the many shipwrecks that are scattered throughout the area.
2.
Visit the Bikini Atoll Nuclear Test Site: During the 1940s and 1950s,
the United States conducted a number of nuclear tests at Bikini Atoll.
Today, the area is a popular destination for those interested in the
history of the nuclear tests. You can take a tour of the area and learn
more about the tests and their effects on the environment.
3.
Take a Boat Tour: Bikini Atoll is surrounded by a number of small
islands, and a boat tour is the perfect way to explore them. You can
take a tour of the area and explore the many shipwrecks that are
scattered throughout the area.
4. Visit the Local Villages:
Bikini Atoll is home to a number of small villages. Take a tour of the
villages to learn more about the area’s culture and history. You can
also purchase local handicrafts from the villagers.
5. Go
Fishing: Bikini Atoll is known for its excellent fishing. You can rent a
boat and explore the area’s many reefs and shipwrecks in search of the
perfect catch.
6. Explore the Local Wildlife: Bikini Atoll is
home to a variety of unique wildlife, including tropical birds, sea
turtles, and dolphins. Take a tour of the area to spot some of the
wildlife.
7. Take a Hike: Bikini Atoll is home to a number of
hiking trails. Take a hike through the lush green foliage and enjoy the
stunning views of the islands.
8. Visit the Local Museum: The
Bikini Atoll Museum is a great place to learn more about the history of
the area. The museum has a variety of artifacts and exhibits that tell
the story of Bikini Atoll.
9. Enjoy the Beach: Bikini Atoll is
home to some of the most stunning beaches in the Marshall Islands. Spend
the day soaking up the sun and relaxing on the beach.
10. Go
Kayaking: Bikini Atoll is surrounded by a number of small islands and
coves, making it the perfect place for kayaking. Take a tour of the area
and explore the many shipwrecks and reefs.
No matter what type
of activity you’re looking for, Bikini Atoll, Namu Marshall Islands has
something for everyone. From relaxing on the beach to exploring the
area’s unique culture and wildlife, Bikini Atoll is a must-visit
destination.
Monday 19 August 2024
WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED
Dr Tom Cowan has just done a great podcast that goes beyond his usual health related topics and exposes some of the other big scams.
https://odysee.com/@Dr.TomCowan:8/8.14.24:e
After discussing the myth of oil being a "fossil fuel" he exposes the lie of "nuclear bombs" including Bikini Atoll testing, and then gets in the massive scams of "government" and "disease" - Great stuff!
Sunday 18 August 2024
Saturday 17 August 2024
A HOT NEW MAKEOVER
Imane Khelif shows off dramatic new feminine makeover days after winning Olympic women's boxing gold.
Friday 16 August 2024
ANOTHER FAKE DEATH
Questions...is this a dude? Did he or she really die or is this a deep state agent ending it's mission and retiring?
This would be a great case of karma in action but I suspect it's death was faked and it's highly unlikely this deep state psychopath would have had any of the death jabs itself...
"Susan Wojcicki, the fully vaccinated former YouTube CEO who was responsible for banning so-called “vaccine conspiracy theories” on the platform, has died after a two-year battle with an aggressive form of cancer.
Wojcicki revealed last year that she was stepping down as CEO at YouTube after nine years leading the Google-owned company.
Her time in the executive role was most notable for the total censorship of any information about vaccines that contradicted the official narrative pushed by Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates during the pandemic"
Thursday 15 August 2024
The fake nuclear bombings
Hiroshima and Nagasaki as poison gas terror attacks
"Hiroshima revisited: the evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the atomic bombings"
"The fake nuclear bombings were not acts of warfare - for Japan had effectively surrendered when it caved and lent a hand with staging them - but rather acts of state terror. Then, what for? Shortly after the bombings, a wave of nuclear fear propaganda was unleashed upon the world. Nuclear war and annihilation were right around the corner - and the answer was world government...How much, or rather how little, real sovereignty is left is painfully obvious in the staged COVID-1984 crisis. "
The bombs dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not atomic.
An important and oft-cited expert witness, the Russian-American pilot and aeronautical engineer Alexander de Seversky, documented in September 1945 that the cities looked identical to others that had been destroyed with incendiaries and explosives.
However, a few things set the two cities apart from others. Foremost among them is "radiation sickness", - both acute and delayed, that is, cancer and leukemia. If there were no atomic bombs, how can radiation sickness be accounted for?
I explore this and other questions in my new, free ebook "Hiroshima revisited: the evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the atomic bombings"
Aside from the "workaday" destruction that does not match a proper nuclear detonation, decisive proof against atomic bombs comes from the radioactive fallout. While such fallout is indeed found at both cities, it, too, does not match a real bomb.
At Hiroshima, we merely find a tiny bit of what looks like a mixture of reactor waste and reactor fuel. At Nagasaki, we find plutonium in considerable amounts. It can be shown, however, that this plutonium was not dispersed in 1945, but only some two years later.
This finding fits with a prediction made by leading atom bomb scientist Arthur Compton in May 1945, namely, that it would be two years yet until plutonium would become available for building bombs from it.
MUSTARD GAS, NOT RADIATION
If we conclude that no atomic bombs exploded, then how could we explain the radiation sickness?
The answer is quite simple: with mustard gas. This is a battle gas that attacks the lungs, the skin, and the interior organs. Among the latter, the bone marrow is very severely affected, and in a manner very similar to radiation.
Long term effects like cancer and leukemia are known as well. Many eyewitnesses have reported the use of poison gas. For example, the book "Children of Hiroshima" contains 105 accounts from Hiroshima schoolchildren. Thirteen of these children explicitly mention poison gas.
One of them, Hisato Itoh, died shortly after writing his report, which contains this statement: "Both my mother and I had been through a great deal of strain during this time ... and then we also started to feel listless and began to lose our hair because we had breathed the gases when the atom bomb fell."
Hiroshima-aftermath.jpg
(Hiroshima aftermath-Did mustard gas do this? Michael: The destruction of the buildings was achieved with incendiaries and explosives, much like in the other bombed-out cities. The mustard gas accounts only for what sets Hiroshima and Nagasaki apart, namely, the "radiation" sickness.) )
Mustard gas, despite its name is an oily fluid, is known to linger. At Hiroshima, it still lingered when Australian journalist Wilfred Burchett, visited in early September, one month after the attack: "My nose detected a peculiar odor unlike anything I have ever smelled before ... they [the Japanese] believe it [the smell] is given off by the poisonous gas still issuing from the earth soaked with radioactivity released by the split uranium atom."
Blaming the poison gas on the atomic bomb seems to have been encouraged by the authorities; this aspect, too, is covered in the book. Because it lingered, mustard gas also inflicted "radiation sickness", sometimes fatal, on rescue workers who had not been in the city for the bombing but entered it only soon afterward. In contrast, a real atomic bomb should have released radiation intense enough to cause the disease only during the detonation itself.
Survivors among these early entrants were at very significantly increased risk to contract leukemia in subsequent years, not far behind those who had been in the city for the bombings. This is just one among many findings that clearly favour mustard gas over radiation as the cause of "radiation sickness." Additionally, why nuclear bombs were simply not available, the U.S. forces were well stocked with aerial bombs filled with mustard gas.
FABRICATED EVIDENCE OF NEUTRON AND GAMMA RADIATION
The orthodox story of the bombs is propped up with many studies which claim to show that strong neutron and gamma-radiation was released in the nuclear detonations. The book examines these, too, and shows that they are full of blatant contradictions and fishy data manipulations. For example, one sample which is adduced as proof of neutron radiation from the bomb was most likely exposed to neutrons in the laboratory only some three years after the bombings had occurred. The book presents many more instances of similar chicanery.
HOW WERE THE BOMBINGS CARRIED OUT?
Many witnesses in fact likened their impressions to a photographer's flash, and indeed the very large magnesium photoflash bomb may have been used to stage the "atomic flash". There was no single enormous "bang", but rather several smaller ones; most likely created with high explosives detonated in the air.
These "bangs" did not evenly affect the entire area of the cities; more witnesses report having seen the flash than heard a bang. Only very few witness reports mention bombs detonating on the ground.
On the other hand, one witness who observed the cloud above Nagasaki from a distance stated that "I thought it was a bomb raining red hot stuff down like a volcano"; this is echoed by several other onlookers.
Among those within the cities who had heard no "bang", several reported having heard "a sound like rain." This suggests that napalm bombs were detonated in the air, and that the "lava" observed from afar was the ignited napalm raining down. Mustard gas was likely dispersed in the same manner. Various firework items such as coloured smoke bombs were apparently used as well - several witnesses describe a display of multiple swirling colors in the cloud.
JAPANESE COLLUSION
It is widely known that during the bombings no air alarm was in effect; in fact, at Hiroshima, the alarm had been lifted just a few minutes earlier.
The failure to trigger an alarm is conventionally explained with the very small number of planes in the air, which the Japanese allegedly mistook as reconnaissance flights. However, a bombing with conventional explosives and incendiaries must have involved a much larger number of planes, which the Japanese could not disregard. They must therefore have colluded in staging the bombings.
While this conclusion may seem scandalous, there are more arguments to support it, for which we don't have space here. Japan colluded only out of desperation, having been reduced to utter helplessness before the American bomber fleets and the growing threat of a Russian attack.
THE BOMBINGS AS TERROR ATTACKS
Some writers have claimed that the "atomic" bombings were really directed at Russia - Stalin's growing ambitions needed to be checked. There are two big problems with this explanation: Firstly, Stalin was not impressed and did not yield an inch, and secondly, he could not have been deceived by the bombings any more than the Japanese.
In fact, no nation-state with a functioning secret service would have been taken in by this crude hoax. That leaves as the addressee only humanity at large. The fake nuclear bombings were not acts of warfare - for Japan had effectively surrendered when it caved and lent a hand with staging them - but rather acts of state terror.
Then, what for? Shortly after the bombings, a wave of nuclear fear propaganda was unleashed upon the world. Nuclear war and annihilation were right around the corner - and the answer was world government. Ironically, it was Comrade Stalin who preserved, for the time being, the national sovereignty not only of the Soviet Union but also that of other countries - at least in a formal sense. How much, or rather how little, real sovereignty is left is painfully obvious in the staged COVID-1984 crisis.
DO NUCLEAR BOMBS EXIST TODAY?
I suspect they don't, but I cannot make a solid case, and the book does not explore this question. If this is your main concern, you may be interested in the book "Death Object: exploding the nuclear weapons hoax" by Akio Nakatani, which can be found on amazon.
CONCLUSION
Check it out - again, the book is free at format as hyperlink: https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited.
--
RELATED - Brabantian- Nuclear Bombs Don't Exist
Anders Bjorkman - My Atomic Bomb Findings (looks at the recent Beirut explosion as well)
Note- I asked Michael, "to cause the damage you attribute to explosives, wouldn't there have needed to be hundreds of planes? We only hear of the Enola Gay,"
Reply: "Yes. That is a very important point. One of the implications is that the Japanese must have seen it coming! The Enola Gay and its one or two companion planes might indeed have been mistaken for reconnaissance missions, but the much larger number of planes that carried out the conventional attack would have been noticed.
It may be though that they were only noticed by the air defense, not by the people. The peoples' attention was focused on the small number of planes that overflew the city, and on the parachutes, they dropped. Meanwhile, the other planes approached from the sea at high altitude (both cities are by the sea). They could have dropped their cargo several km before the cities and then banked away.
Once the large clouds had been produced, and particularly after the fires were going and smoke was rising, they could have overflown the cities without being seen.
I discuss all of this in chapter 13 of the book, which is not excessively technical (some others are a little "hardcore".
First Comment from Tony B
Too many long convoluted stretches in this and without real purpose. This is written as though no one else has had the bomb.
The writer fails to notice that there were executions in the U.S. for those caught giving the bomb secrets to the soviet, which shortly did begin testing nuclear bombs, obviously using the information they were given. Russians are not the type of people to set off a long series of fake nuclear explosions just for "terrorizing" purposes.
Plus an assumption comparing the destruction of Japanese cities to European type cities amounts to apples and oranges as Japanese cities are, or were then anyway, almost totally constructed of wood. The shock wave of a nuclear bomb would simply make ignitable splinters of the whole place. It would not require a mass bombing to level and burn a whole city so why does he think there was such a thing that no one seemed to detect?
With some study, one could find many, many, questions in this strange fantasy. It's not of the same caliber of the easily proven phony moon landing.
A squadron of 66 bombers took off on August 6th (666) to bomb the city of Imabari, even though that city had already been bombed to oblivion in April and May of the same year. Imabari is on the island of Shikoku and is only 35 miles from Hiroshima. It's possible that the pilots and crew were following coordinates given to them for Hiroshima while believing they were bombing Imabari. This would help keep the psyop limited to as small a number of people as possible and prevent word from getting out that the nuke story was a fabrication.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg0faujaOow
More about it here - scroll down to "Hiroshima VIDEO". It includes a short excerpt taken from a book on the subject about the bombing of Imabari.
The first news out of Japan reported that Hiroshima was hit with incendiary bombs. An AP article in the LA Times, Aug 7, 1945, noted that ... "Hiroshima Southwestern Honshu army center, had been raided by a small number of American B-29's with incendiaries and explosives at 8.20 am Monday."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDP4-aH1EDA
If you look at pictures of the bombing aftermath it seems obvious that it wasn't a nuke that destroyed Hiroshima. Leafless tree trunks and wooden(?) utility poles can be seen standing, even right near ground zero (the dome). Photos taken from the air show roads have little or no debris on them and the Hiroshima streetcars that survived the bombing were up and running 3 days after the attack, as gizmodo.com reported. (No EMP to fry the trams' electrics?)
Then there are these guys...
Eight Jesuit priests were said to have "miraculously" survived the blast even though they were less than half a mile away (8 blocks) from ground zero. The official story says that the firestorm caused an area within 4.4 miles from ground zero to be incinerated and 80,000 ~ 140,000 people died instantly. Yet the priests survived because they believed they were living "the message of Fatima". They were examined by army doctors apparently suffered no serious injuries or ill effects from radiation poisoning.
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/10/palmer-nuclear-attacks-on-japan.html
An important and oft-cited expert witness, the Russian-American pilot and aeronautical engineer Alexander de Seversky, documented in September 1945 that the cities looked identical to others that had been destroyed with incendiaries and explosives.
However, a few things set the two cities apart from others. Foremost among them is "radiation sickness", - both acute and delayed, that is, cancer and leukemia. If there were no atomic bombs, how can radiation sickness be accounted for?
I explore this and other questions in my new, free ebook "Hiroshima revisited: the evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the atomic bombings"
Aside from the "workaday" destruction that does not match a proper nuclear detonation, decisive proof against atomic bombs comes from the radioactive fallout. While such fallout is indeed found at both cities, it, too, does not match a real bomb.
At Hiroshima, we merely find a tiny bit of what looks like a mixture of reactor waste and reactor fuel. At Nagasaki, we find plutonium in considerable amounts. It can be shown, however, that this plutonium was not dispersed in 1945, but only some two years later.
This finding fits with a prediction made by leading atom bomb scientist Arthur Compton in May 1945, namely, that it would be two years yet until plutonium would become available for building bombs from it.
MUSTARD GAS, NOT RADIATION
If we conclude that no atomic bombs exploded, then how could we explain the radiation sickness?
The answer is quite simple: with mustard gas. This is a battle gas that attacks the lungs, the skin, and the interior organs. Among the latter, the bone marrow is very severely affected, and in a manner very similar to radiation.
Long term effects like cancer and leukemia are known as well. Many eyewitnesses have reported the use of poison gas. For example, the book "Children of Hiroshima" contains 105 accounts from Hiroshima schoolchildren. Thirteen of these children explicitly mention poison gas.
One of them, Hisato Itoh, died shortly after writing his report, which contains this statement: "Both my mother and I had been through a great deal of strain during this time ... and then we also started to feel listless and began to lose our hair because we had breathed the gases when the atom bomb fell."
Hiroshima-aftermath.jpg
(Hiroshima aftermath-Did mustard gas do this? Michael: The destruction of the buildings was achieved with incendiaries and explosives, much like in the other bombed-out cities. The mustard gas accounts only for what sets Hiroshima and Nagasaki apart, namely, the "radiation" sickness.) )
Mustard gas, despite its name is an oily fluid, is known to linger. At Hiroshima, it still lingered when Australian journalist Wilfred Burchett, visited in early September, one month after the attack: "My nose detected a peculiar odor unlike anything I have ever smelled before ... they [the Japanese] believe it [the smell] is given off by the poisonous gas still issuing from the earth soaked with radioactivity released by the split uranium atom."
Blaming the poison gas on the atomic bomb seems to have been encouraged by the authorities; this aspect, too, is covered in the book. Because it lingered, mustard gas also inflicted "radiation sickness", sometimes fatal, on rescue workers who had not been in the city for the bombing but entered it only soon afterward. In contrast, a real atomic bomb should have released radiation intense enough to cause the disease only during the detonation itself.
Survivors among these early entrants were at very significantly increased risk to contract leukemia in subsequent years, not far behind those who had been in the city for the bombings. This is just one among many findings that clearly favour mustard gas over radiation as the cause of "radiation sickness." Additionally, why nuclear bombs were simply not available, the U.S. forces were well stocked with aerial bombs filled with mustard gas.
FABRICATED EVIDENCE OF NEUTRON AND GAMMA RADIATION
The orthodox story of the bombs is propped up with many studies which claim to show that strong neutron and gamma-radiation was released in the nuclear detonations. The book examines these, too, and shows that they are full of blatant contradictions and fishy data manipulations. For example, one sample which is adduced as proof of neutron radiation from the bomb was most likely exposed to neutrons in the laboratory only some three years after the bombings had occurred. The book presents many more instances of similar chicanery.
HOW WERE THE BOMBINGS CARRIED OUT?
Many witnesses in fact likened their impressions to a photographer's flash, and indeed the very large magnesium photoflash bomb may have been used to stage the "atomic flash". There was no single enormous "bang", but rather several smaller ones; most likely created with high explosives detonated in the air.
These "bangs" did not evenly affect the entire area of the cities; more witnesses report having seen the flash than heard a bang. Only very few witness reports mention bombs detonating on the ground.
On the other hand, one witness who observed the cloud above Nagasaki from a distance stated that "I thought it was a bomb raining red hot stuff down like a volcano"; this is echoed by several other onlookers.
Among those within the cities who had heard no "bang", several reported having heard "a sound like rain." This suggests that napalm bombs were detonated in the air, and that the "lava" observed from afar was the ignited napalm raining down. Mustard gas was likely dispersed in the same manner. Various firework items such as coloured smoke bombs were apparently used as well - several witnesses describe a display of multiple swirling colors in the cloud.
JAPANESE COLLUSION
It is widely known that during the bombings no air alarm was in effect; in fact, at Hiroshima, the alarm had been lifted just a few minutes earlier.
The failure to trigger an alarm is conventionally explained with the very small number of planes in the air, which the Japanese allegedly mistook as reconnaissance flights. However, a bombing with conventional explosives and incendiaries must have involved a much larger number of planes, which the Japanese could not disregard. They must therefore have colluded in staging the bombings.
While this conclusion may seem scandalous, there are more arguments to support it, for which we don't have space here. Japan colluded only out of desperation, having been reduced to utter helplessness before the American bomber fleets and the growing threat of a Russian attack.
THE BOMBINGS AS TERROR ATTACKS
Some writers have claimed that the "atomic" bombings were really directed at Russia - Stalin's growing ambitions needed to be checked. There are two big problems with this explanation: Firstly, Stalin was not impressed and did not yield an inch, and secondly, he could not have been deceived by the bombings any more than the Japanese.
In fact, no nation-state with a functioning secret service would have been taken in by this crude hoax. That leaves as the addressee only humanity at large. The fake nuclear bombings were not acts of warfare - for Japan had effectively surrendered when it caved and lent a hand with staging them - but rather acts of state terror.
Then, what for? Shortly after the bombings, a wave of nuclear fear propaganda was unleashed upon the world. Nuclear war and annihilation were right around the corner - and the answer was world government. Ironically, it was Comrade Stalin who preserved, for the time being, the national sovereignty not only of the Soviet Union but also that of other countries - at least in a formal sense. How much, or rather how little, real sovereignty is left is painfully obvious in the staged COVID-1984 crisis.
DO NUCLEAR BOMBS EXIST TODAY?
I suspect they don't, but I cannot make a solid case, and the book does not explore this question. If this is your main concern, you may be interested in the book "Death Object: exploding the nuclear weapons hoax" by Akio Nakatani, which can be found on amazon.
CONCLUSION
Check it out - again, the book is free at format as hyperlink: https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited.
--
RELATED - Brabantian- Nuclear Bombs Don't Exist
Anders Bjorkman - My Atomic Bomb Findings (looks at the recent Beirut explosion as well)
Note- I asked Michael, "to cause the damage you attribute to explosives, wouldn't there have needed to be hundreds of planes? We only hear of the Enola Gay,"
Reply: "Yes. That is a very important point. One of the implications is that the Japanese must have seen it coming! The Enola Gay and its one or two companion planes might indeed have been mistaken for reconnaissance missions, but the much larger number of planes that carried out the conventional attack would have been noticed.
It may be though that they were only noticed by the air defense, not by the people. The peoples' attention was focused on the small number of planes that overflew the city, and on the parachutes, they dropped. Meanwhile, the other planes approached from the sea at high altitude (both cities are by the sea). They could have dropped their cargo several km before the cities and then banked away.
Once the large clouds had been produced, and particularly after the fires were going and smoke was rising, they could have overflown the cities without being seen.
I discuss all of this in chapter 13 of the book, which is not excessively technical (some others are a little "hardcore".
First Comment from Tony B
Too many long convoluted stretches in this and without real purpose. This is written as though no one else has had the bomb.
The writer fails to notice that there were executions in the U.S. for those caught giving the bomb secrets to the soviet, which shortly did begin testing nuclear bombs, obviously using the information they were given. Russians are not the type of people to set off a long series of fake nuclear explosions just for "terrorizing" purposes.
Plus an assumption comparing the destruction of Japanese cities to European type cities amounts to apples and oranges as Japanese cities are, or were then anyway, almost totally constructed of wood. The shock wave of a nuclear bomb would simply make ignitable splinters of the whole place. It would not require a mass bombing to level and burn a whole city so why does he think there was such a thing that no one seemed to detect?
With some study, one could find many, many, questions in this strange fantasy. It's not of the same caliber of the easily proven phony moon landing.
A squadron of 66 bombers took off on August 6th (666) to bomb the city of Imabari, even though that city had already been bombed to oblivion in April and May of the same year. Imabari is on the island of Shikoku and is only 35 miles from Hiroshima. It's possible that the pilots and crew were following coordinates given to them for Hiroshima while believing they were bombing Imabari. This would help keep the psyop limited to as small a number of people as possible and prevent word from getting out that the nuke story was a fabrication.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg0faujaOow
More about it here - scroll down to "Hiroshima VIDEO". It includes a short excerpt taken from a book on the subject about the bombing of Imabari.
The first news out of Japan reported that Hiroshima was hit with incendiary bombs. An AP article in the LA Times, Aug 7, 1945, noted that ... "Hiroshima Southwestern Honshu army center, had been raided by a small number of American B-29's with incendiaries and explosives at 8.20 am Monday."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDP4-aH1EDA
If you look at pictures of the bombing aftermath it seems obvious that it wasn't a nuke that destroyed Hiroshima. Leafless tree trunks and wooden(?) utility poles can be seen standing, even right near ground zero (the dome). Photos taken from the air show roads have little or no debris on them and the Hiroshima streetcars that survived the bombing were up and running 3 days after the attack, as gizmodo.com reported. (No EMP to fry the trams' electrics?)
Then there are these guys...
Eight Jesuit priests were said to have "miraculously" survived the blast even though they were less than half a mile away (8 blocks) from ground zero. The official story says that the firestorm caused an area within 4.4 miles from ground zero to be incinerated and 80,000 ~ 140,000 people died instantly. Yet the priests survived because they believed they were living "the message of Fatima". They were examined by army doctors apparently suffered no serious injuries or ill effects from radiation poisoning.
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/10/palmer-nuclear-attacks-on-japan.html
Wednesday 14 August 2024
WHY I LIKE ODYSEE
Dear friends of Odysee,
Starting today, we're removing all ads.
We
don't need ads to make money as a platform and we are confident in the
development of our own new monetisation programs that will help creators
earn a living and at the same time keep Odysee alive.
Ultimately,
sacrificing the overall user experience to make a few bucks isn't worth
it to us and nor is it even sustainable for a platform that wishes to
make something truly open and creatively free.
As
we take this decision, one thing is certain to us, media platforms
(even ones that market themselves as 'free-speech') typically devolve
into advertising companies and end up becoming beholden to their
paymasters. It's been that way for centuries and is never going to
change.
As we see YouTube become
more aggressive with their ad deployment and 'Free Speech' platforms try
to build their own ad businesses it's apparent to us that we're
building a model for Odysee that will keep it sustainable not only
financially, but in its ability to provide an incorruptible user
experience.
Our approach may be
considered niche or unconventional, that's fine by us. Odysee will be
used by the world on terms that are agreeable to its users, and we know
our users don't like ads.
Best,
Founder & Creator, Chief Executive Officer.
Julian Chandra
Tuesday 13 August 2024
Juliet Lewis is evolving
Juliet Lewis is looking like an Olympic athlete these days🤩
"Queer as Folk" creator Stephen Dunn clearly knew what he was doing when choosing a name for the mother of non-binary teen-turned-drag queen Mingus (Fin Argus). Played by perennial gay icon Juliette Lewis, Judy is a fountain of unconditional love...
https://ew.com/tv/juliette-lewis-queer-as-folk-interview/
Monday 12 August 2024
Why I never use Google search
Doing the same search: "deaths due to covid vaccinations" - searching on Google search engine vs Yandex search engine gives very different results:
Google says the death jabs have possibly killed 147 people, Yandex says they have killed at least 17 million, probably more.
https://yandex.com/
While Russian based Yandex is probably a bit dodgy too, I would trust them over Google any day. It doesn't have a browser extension, and it's own browser is pretty hopeless unless you speak Russian, but pinning Yandex as a tab in your browser is a pretty good work around for not being able to make it the default search engine.
QWANT
Lately I've also been using the French based search engine Qwant quite a bit, and at the start of this year it seemed pretty good.
It works well in English language, and it can be added to any browser as the default search using an extension, making it easy to replace the increasingly controlled Duckduckgo which is the only even half decent search available by default on most browsers.
But with past connections to both Microsoft and the globalist French government, it is unlikely to be the bastion of privacy it presents itself as, and it now seems to be giving increasingly controlled globalist search results. So sadly, like DuckDuckGo, it seems to have turned to the dark side. So back to Yandex I go.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)