One of the most controversial topics online at the moment (apart from the covidhoax) is TRANNIES. I make a point of using the word “TRANNY” because it triggers LIBTARDS and WOKETARDS, and I also try to put some key words in CAPS because that seems to trigger them as well, which is always a bonus.
Now by the term “TRANNY” I’m referring to people who are playing the role of appearing to be the inverse of their biological gender. One of the more approved words for people with this MENTAL DISORDER is “TRANSVESTITE”. I’m not referring to the transmission systems in cars, which are also called trannies by some mechanics.
The subject has opened up over the past few years, and some TRANNIES are now widely accepted as being MEN IN DRAG, like Michelle Obama (AKA Michael Robinson) but, even that glaringly obvious example took nearly a decade before a lot of people finally saw it.
The next level of trannies are also reasonably obvious, but still a big stretch for most NORMIES. The more obvious ones include European royalty, Hollywood actresses, American “first ladies”, “female” pro athletes, and many “female” politicians. These are mostly Male To Female TRANNIES (MTF). There are also some Female to Male (FTM) TRANNIES but those are rarer and generally harder to spot.
Part of what makes all this more confusing, is that as part of the psyop a lot of “TRANSVESTIGATORS” are actually controlled opposition shills. One of their key tactics is to repeat the mantra “EVERYONE IS AN INVERT” so claiming that pretty much all celebs of any sort are trannies. This is utter bollocks, but it damages the credibility of real transvestigators.
For example, some of them are even claiming male body builders like Arnold Schwarzenegger are biological females. These sort of unlikely claims remain uncensored on mainstream platforms while more legitimate transvestigations are generally taken down hard.
Arnie in this old photo doesn’t appear to be packing much heat, but otherwise has no female features apart from lack of body hair, and that would be waxed or shaved
Transvestigations are another one of the key psyops designed to create uncertainty and confusion (Operation Chaos), and because many people have been reacting fairly badly to this new area of confusion I recently promised several friends I would try to do a blog post with a simple checklist to make this all a bit easier. Depending on what categories were included and how they were split up, the number could have ranged from as low as 10 right up to about 30. The choices of which measurements and characteristics to include is fairly arbitrary but the used ones are all fairly easy to spot and may be significant, particularly if a lot of them occur together
Just because a person has a few of these characteristics (Except for #1) it by no means proves they are a biological male. The typical sort of score of the suspicious looking “females” we are looking into, is at least 10, and usually more. So it is pretty high really. Recently I watched a Korean movie (Parasite, 2019) and all the female actresses would get a very low score as far as I could tell. That NEVER happens in recent Hollywood movies. Never…
OK, let’s rip into it:
SOME KEY MALE CHARACTERISTICS
# 1. Having a COCK
Yes, this is for real, let’s not beat around the bush here, it’s a major give away. Mostly they keep them well hidden, but not always, and it’s not only Michelle Obama who tends to let things out of the bag sometimes. “Lady Gaga” likes to wave his dick around onstage, and there are quite a few others who look damn strange in a swimsuit.
Michael Robinson scores very high on this checklist – hard to beat in fact!
Pamela Anderson used to pack her lunch much better back in Baywatch days!
#2. Having a brow ridge
Apart from #1, this list is in random order. But it is very rare for females to have a brow ridge. Brow ridge reduction is one of the key surgery procedures done in Facial Feminization Surgery (FFS), a set of surgical procedures that alter typically male facial features to make them closer in shape and size to typical female facial features. It includes various bone and/or soft tissue procedures such as foreheadplasty to change the shape of the forehead bone or move the frontal hairline, brow lift, rhinoplasty, cheek implantation, and lip augmentation as well as facial hair removal. – http://aaronstonemd-plasticsurgery
#3. Having an Adam’s apple
Some women do have visible Adam’s apples, but the shape is usually different to male ones, and they are seldom large angular bulges. One of the reasons Sandra Bullock is so often discussed in transvestigation circles is that she has a very masculine Adam’s apple, along with a wide range of other masculine features, along with an unusual name. (Names are frequently another area of interest)
Males tend to have a much more prominent Adam’s apple than females. The Adam’s apple can be reduced with a procedure called a “tracheal shave” or “Chondrolaryngoplasty”. This is best done via an incision in the natural neck skin crease above the Adam’s apple to give the least noticeable scar. It is not always possible to make a large Adam’s apple invisible with this procedure, rather the intent is to change it from the masculine 90 degree Adam’s apple angle to a more feminine 120 degree Adam’s apple angle – http://aaronstonemd-plasticsurgery
#4. Male Q-angle
This is one of the measurements that cannot be easily disguised, nor can it be changed by surgery. So it is a key factor to check out. Typically, for men, the angle is around 12° while, for women, the angle Q angle is 17°. Some of the controlled mainstream medical sites that tend to promote misinformation, are attempting to claim there is no real difference in Q-angle. But there is.
This picture of Cameron Diaz is very revealing. She racks up quite a few points here, including #1, Q-angle, and several others we’ll be getting to soon.
#5. Shoulders wider than hips
This is one of the most basic ratios, and often one of the easiest to spot so is frequently discussed. Yes there are all sorts of body shapes, and not all women have wide hips. But as with all of these measurements, shoulders wider than hips is just another point. Typically men have shoulders around 3x the width of their head, while women have a shoulder width around 2.5x their head width. And their heads are also usually smaller as well.
Sarena Williams is a good case study – “she” fails pretty much everything on this list, as do most pro women’s tennis players. Certainly she scores here on shoulders wider than hips!
#6.MALE FINGER RATIO
This one is of particular interest to me because I fail it quite markedly. Generally a male’s third finger (ring finger) is slightly longer than their first finger (index finger), while a female’s index finger is slightly longer. But in my own case, my index finger is 8mm longer than my third finger, and that’s why I drop a point on this checklist. Various commentators have drawn conclusions about the significance of these ratios, including homosexuality and prostrate cancer, but there is very little consensus, other than most females have a longer index finger.
This also sometimes been called 2D:4D ratio, and there have been claims of it being linked to verbal aggression, and risk taking, but these seem to be from studies that were getting funding to essentially prove that males tend to be more aggressive than females, so not exactly ground breaking research.
#7.LARGE HANDS AND FEET
Generally hands and feet are proportional to overall height, and certainly most tall women have fairly large feet. It’s easier to discuss foot size here rather than hand size because they have actual numbered sizes for feet, but hand and foot sizes generally match each other. I’m referring to US Men’s shoe sizes here (which are one size larger than UK/NZ/Aus sizes – eg. US12 = UK 11 ).
When looking at female celebs and models in particular a common point of note is that they seem to have unusually large hands and feet. Generally men have larger foot to height ratios than females, but this is not always consistent and should only be taken as another one of the measurements. For example, I have a male friend who is 6″1′ and has US9 feet, (overall his smallish feet are the only point he drops), while I also have a female friend who is 6″1″ as well but has US men’s size 12 feet (she scores two points overall, one for her large feet, and another one for her tall overall height).
Cindy Crawford scores another point for her US10 feet…
#8.ULTRA LOW BODY FAT
As western populations have become increasingly obese over the past 50 years, it has become fashionable to be “skinny”, particularly for women, But women naturally have a higher body fat ratio than men. This subject is very controversial and people will argue about it until the cows come home, but to keep things really simple here, and using round numbers, I’ll just say that while a very high portion of both males and females in western societies are overweight, for males it is generally not ideal to have less than 5% body fat, and for females sub 10% is potentially unhealthy. For example, women with sub 10% body fat are often infertile.
American actress Sarah Hyland is another one of many celebs who look unnaturally thin. This may all be a result of eating disorders, but on this list looking skeletal earns another point.
#9. FAKING PREGNANCY
As well has having ultra low body fat, so being unlikely to become pregnant anyway, many “female” celebs have been caught using MOON BUMPS which are a real give away. The two main balls ups that tend to occur when using moon bumps are that they slip down, in some cases very noticeably, or they briefly fold up in the middle when the expectant mother is sitting down. In some cases these incidences are captured on film and some end up going viral for a short while before being deleted from the internet.
Meghan Markle is the most legendary example of moon bump slippage, as hers was dropping out all over the place, while the mainstream desperately tried to cover the whole story up as a “conspiracy theory”.
These embarrassing moments were quickly deleted!
Along with moon bumps there are also cases of no backstory, a classic example being Michelle Obama/Michael Robinson who is supposedly birth mother to two daughters but that entire story falls to bits as soon as it is looked into. New Zealand ex “prime minister” Jacinda Ardern’s pregnancy story is another rabbit hole of epic proportions. She may have successfully worn the moon bump, but the rest of that story is full of holes.
#10. AN ADONIS BELT
The Adonis Belt, which is a visible V in the lower belly area, only occurs in (fit) male bodies, and would never usually be seen in a biological female, so having one of these is a real give away. Some celebs like Pink and Cameron Diaz like to show off their Adonis belts at the beach. While I’m tempted to give this measurement double points, everything here only scores one point.
Pink’s Adonis belt is really quite impressive. Most men would be very proud of that.
Having an Adonis belt is another point on the scoreboard for Cameron Diaz
#11. NO ARSE
Arses come in all sizes and shapes, but no arse at all screams schoolboy, rather than woman. While breasts can easily be boosted with silicon implants (and pretty much all “female” actresses of both sexes have breast implants), arses are harder to fake and implants are more likely to go horribly wrong. So an astonishing number of celeb “sex symbols” seem to have no back end.
Catherine Zeta Jones likes to shake her booty
Portia De Rossi really has the whole package
#12 EXCESSIVELY RAPID AGING AND MASCULINIZATION
Masculinization is when a female takes on male characteristics. I left this one to last because it often stirs up the most resistance and outrage. Some women will argue that transvestigators are picking on post menopausal women who have low estrogen, and their more masculine appearance is normal. But this characteristic applies to a wide range of “women” with ages ranging down to as low as early 30’s, and often includes some quite unusual aging.
Here the actresses Emma Watson and Bonnie Wright from the Harry Potter movies are both shown aged approx 20 and then again around 30. They are fairly typical examples, and anyone who researches the Harry Potter books or movies will find a rabbit hole of such epic proportions that this will barely even be surprising amongst all the other dark secrets. Again this characteristic is not being held to be “proof” of transgenderism, but is just one more point out of more than a dozen.
SOME OTHER BIOLOGICAL RED FLAGS
I decided to stop here at a dozen, or I’d be going on endlessly, but there are quite a few other features of note. Here are another half dozen I have left out:
NO BACK CURVE, VERY TALL OVERALL HEIGHT, A BIG SQUARE JAW, MALE COLLAR BONES (CLAVICLES), BIG EARS, BIG FACIAL FEATURES, AND WIDE SPACED EYES
AND SOME NON BIOLOGICAL POINTS OF INTEREST
These are also some non- biological markers that are commonly taken to be red flags, here are three of the most frequently observed ones:
REVEALING NAMES – Sometimes these come in the form of masculine surnames such as Katie PERRY or Katherine ROSS. Sometimes it’s first names like TAYLOR Swift or GLENN Close. And sometimes the names are just plain revealing, in a variety of ways, such as Sandra BULLOCK or Courtney COX.
GIVES OFF A MALE VIBE – Yeah, this one is very vague, and causes a lot of indignant outrage. I’m not talking here about the physically repulsive examples, often playing the role of politicians etc, but the supposedly “HOT” celebs. These “women” are heralded as sex symbols and ideal examples of the female form. So why is it that so many heterosexual man find them not just unattractive, but downright creepy. It could be just the overall fakeness, but I think there is an undefinable feminine vibe that men find attractive, and these “women” just don’t have it.
Angela Jolie gives off many different vibes, none of them feminine!
Jessica Simpson certainly scores very highly on this list, but there is something more than the biological markers, something that screams “I’M A MAN IN DRAG!”
Now, armed with this checklist, you will never see most Hollywood actresses or American first “ladies” in quite the same light again.