Fluoridation causes an average 5% drop in children's IQ

A major US government study on fluoride damage to the brain should have ended fluoridation in New Zealand.

To summarize the key finding: Children born to mothers drinking the standard levels of fluoride used in NZ would have on average a 5 POINT LOWER IQ than children not exposed to fluoride poisoning.

 

 

The study published by the US Government’s Environmental Health Perspectives found that children born to mothers exposed to fluoride while pregnant, had significantly lower IQ scores. This is particularly relevant to New Zealand where most of the population is currently subjected to fluoridation.

 

It measured fluoride in urine and found the average level of fluoride in urine was 0.9mg/L (mg/L = parts per million). To relate this to water fluoride concentration, a separate study found that pregnant women in an area with 0.4 to 0.8 ppm water fluoride only had slightly lower urine fluoride than the average participants in this study. The NZ Ministry of Health recommends fluoride chemicals be added to the water at 0.85ppm.

 

Pregnant women in New Zealand in fluoridated areas likely have similar levels of urine fluoride as those in the American study. Urine fluoride reflects total fluoride intake from all sources, not just fluoridated water. The paper also reports that in the USA, which is 70% fluoridated, urine fluoride ranges from about 0.5 to 1.5 mg/L.

 

The child of a mother who was drinking water with 0.85ppm fluoride would be predicted to have 5 lower IQ points than if the mother had drunk water with close to zero fluoride in it. This obviously has huge consequences for New Zealand children.

 

The Ministry of Health recommended 1ppm until the 1990s when it reduced to a range from 0.7ppm to 1ppm, with a target of 0.85ppm. The US Human and Health Services have directed a maximum of 0.7ppm for fluoridation.

 

This study was very carefully done by a group of researchers who have produced over 50 papers on the cognitive health of children in relationship to environmental exposures. It was funded by the US Government’s National Institute of Health and was a multi-million dollar study. This was the group’s first study of fluoride – their other studies mostly dealing with lead, mercury and other environmental neurotoxicants.

 

The study controlled for a wide range of potential factors that might have skewed the results and produced a false effect. It was able to largely rule out confounding effects by these other factors. The factors ruled out included lead, mercury, socio-economic status, smoking, alcohol use, and health problems during pregnancy.

 

This study offers confirmation of previous studies in Mexico, China and elsewhere. Some of those studies had higher fluoride exposures than are commonly found in fluoridating countries, but many did not. 

 

The sole study in a country with artificial water fluoridation was by Dunedin (NZ) dentist Jonathan Broadbent. That study found no association between water fluoridation and IQ and was trumpeted by fluoridation defenders. But that study was shown to have almost no difference in TOTAL fluoride intake between the children with fluoridated water and those with non-fluoridated water, since at least half of the children in the non-fluoridated area were given fluoride supplements. This left only a small proportion of the study children without substantial fluoride exposure. 

 

Nor did this study look at maternal fluoride exposure during pregnancy, which could be the most vulnerable time of exposure.

 

The study authors were cautious in their conclusions, but the implications of this study are enormous. There have been 58 other human studies looking at fluoride exposure and harm to the brain – 51 of them have found an association.

 

FLUORIDE CAUSES TOOTH DECAY

Reducing tooth decay is the excuse the globalist governments use when poisoning the water supply. That lie falls apart as soon as any real research is done.

 FLUORIDE CAUSES TOOTH DECAY

Fluorides and dental fluorosis are actually associated with increased tooth decay. The most comprehensive US review was carried out by the National Institute of Dental Research on 39,000 school children aged 5-17 years. It showed no significant differences in terms of DMF (decayed, missing and filled teeth).

What it did show was that high decay cities (66.5-87.5 percent) have 9.34 percent more decay in the children who drink fluoridated water. Furthermore, a 5.4 percent increase in students with decay was observed when 1 ppm fluoride was added to the water supply. Nine fluoridated cities with high decay had 10 percent more decay than nine equivalent non-fluoridated cities.

The world’s largest study on dental caries, which looked at 400,000 students, revealed that decay increased 27 percent with a 1ppm fluoride increase in drinking water. In Japan, fluoridation caused decay increases of 7 percent in 22,000 students,while in the US a decay increase of 43 percent occurred in 29,000 students when 1ppm fluoride was added to drinking water.

https://www.westonaprice.org/fluoride-worse-than-we-thought

 

 

 

NZ Foods are poisoned with fluoride

 The European Court of Justice ruled in 2009 that fluoridated water must be treated as a medicine, and cannot be used to prepare foods, so Europe could technically block foods imported from Australia, NZ, USA and Ireland at any time.

Which countries poison their citizens with Fluoride?

 After decades of pro-fluoride propaganda in the New Zealand media, there are a lot of people here who still think that fluoridation is widespread. But outside of America, the practice is rare. In most countries it is illegal.

· Approximately 4% of the world’s population are being poisoned with a fluoridated water supply.

 

· There are more people drinking fluoridated water in the USA than the rest of the world combined.

 

 

 

24 countries are still poisoning their citizens with water fluoridation, but most of these countries have a low percentage of their population consuming fluoridated water, although NZ's percentage has climbed significantly as our globalist governments have made it "mandatory":

Peru – 2%

Serbia – 3%

Vietnam – 4%

Papua New Guinea – 6%

South Korea – 6%

Spain – 11%

United Kingdom – 11%

Guatemala – 13%

Panama – 15%

Argentina – 19%

Libya – 21%

Fiji – 36%

Brazil – 41%

Canada – 45% *

New Zealand – 58%

Guyana – 62%

USA – 64%

Chile – 70%

Southern Ireland – 73%

Malaysia – 75%

Australia – 75% **

Brunei – 95%

Hong Kong – 100%

Singapore – 100%

 

THE FACE OF GLOBALIST OPPRESSION IN NZ

Dr Diana Sarfati is the globalist puppet who is forcing NZ councils to poison their residents.

 

 

Director General of Health, Dr Diana Sarfati, is forcing all NZ councils to fluoridate their residents or face a fine of $200,000 plus $10,000 per day, amounting to over $3,000,000 via their rates if they do not do what she says.

 

 

 

This is why we need to expose this mass poisoning.

 

Fluoride Free Awareness Month

For the first time, FLUORIDE FREE NZ are embarking on a Fluoride Free Awareness Month.   We hope to enlist as many people as possible to commit to posting one item about fluoride on any social media outlet every day for the whole month. By having a concerted effort to spread the evidence about water fluoridation, more people will become informed and concerned about it. It turns out that Dr Diana Sarfati's (Director-General of Health) threats to enforce huge fines on councils who don't comply to her unlawful demand to add fluoridation chemicals to local water supplies may have been nothing more than HOT AIR.   In a court hearing on Wednesday, the lawyer for the DG advised the judge that there was no indication the DG was intending to enforce any fines on non-compliant councils. We believe this is a tacit commitment from Sarfati not to embark on enforcement, at least not until the Bill of Rights analysis has been completed. Even after that we do not believe that she would be able to enforce any fines until the legal case by New Health New Zealand has been completed.   See the FFNZ press release for more detail.